Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
guyb

Orleans, US
923 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D100 or S2?"

guyb Registered since 11th Apr 2002
Wed 08-Jan-03 02:06 AM

Just my two cents about the "underexposure problem" that pops up on threads. I have not seen it at all on my D100. Maybe there is some difference not found in Nikon's quality control.

One thing I don't get about it. If it is underexposing, why not simply give more exposure, just like film? You can look at the LCD to tell. Maybe I am missing something. I wish there were more owners of S2s and D100s to compare the two in a more statistically correct manner.

l8r,
Guy


l8r,
Guy

A general, generic topic D100 or S2? [View all] , gtm Silver Member , Tue 07-Jan-03 07:35 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D100 or S2?
1
Reply message RE: D100 or S2?
2
Reply message RE: D100 or S2?
3
Reply message Look harder
4
Reply message RE: Look harder
5