>So, let me get this straight... > >The D600 is actually showing less noise at high ISO than the >D3s when files from *both* are viewed at their respective 100% >magnification ratios (e.g. at 100% actual pixels of each >file)? Because that's remarkable. That would mean the >per-pixel noise of the D600 would have to be lower than that >of the D3s (and when printed or viewed at the same size, the >advantage would likely be even greater).
Sorry no. I think the D3s is about equal in noise without any downsampling. But when delivering, the D600 I cleaner. The downsampling makes a huge difference.