Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Conflicted on the D400

PerroneFord

Tallahassee, US
2807 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"Conflicted on the D400"

PerroneFord Silver Member Nikonian since 07th Apr 2011
Mon 08-Oct-12 03:45 PM

Yesterday was an odd day. I shot my D600 for the very first time. I had purchased it on Thursday, but had other shoots planned for the weekend that I needed a "sure thing" for. Sunday I was free to experiment a bit.

Frankly, I was shocked at what I got back. I was shooting college volleyball in our notoriously bad gym. Proper exposure is ISO 3200, F2.8, 1/500. I typically shoot 1/640 or 1/800, so I am down a little on exposure. I chose to run the D600 and the D3s and only use the 300/2.8 and the 70-200/2.8

As I looked at both images in post, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Well, I could, but didn't want to. The D600 was cleaner than the D3s. Twice the megapixels, and cleaner. Oh my.

The grip is not you available for the D600. And even if it was, the camera comes up short in a lot of the same ways the D7000 does. At least for me. It's too small. The pro bodies still snap focus better. The FPS of the pro bodies IS an advantage for shooting some thing. I still prefer to time my shots, but 3 shot bursts are still very helpful at times.

And this leads me to my D400 dilemma. For so long, I have wanted another professional DX camera. I want it in a pro body. I know that probably won't happen. So I thought to myself that it's ok. I'd compromise on the D400 with a DX 24MP sensor. After shooting the D600 this weekend, I am no longer sure. Yes, the crop factor would be VERY helpful. Especially outdoors for field sports. But the trade off is the noise performance indoors. And I am at what I suspect is the same crossroads Nikon found themselves at with the D2x > D3. Whether to push ahead with DX technology, or capitulate and go to FX. And for the first time, I am saying out loud, that I'd be ok with the D400 having the FX sensor in the D600. I'd still buy it. BUT I would only buy it if it brought the rest of the package to the game. Faster focusing, better sized body, etc.

Comments and thoughts welcome as always.

------
Webpage: http://www.ptfphoto.com

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic Conflicted on the D400 [View all] , PerroneFord Silver Member , Mon 08-Oct-12 01:45 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
1
Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
2
     Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
6
Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
3
Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
4
     Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
5
          Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
7
          Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
14
               Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
15
Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
8
Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
9
     Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
10
          Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
11
          Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
12
               Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
13
          Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
16
          Reply message RE: Conflicted on the D400
17