Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
ZoneV

US
3564 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D200 vs d300s"

ZoneV Silver Member Nikonian since 08th Jan 2005
Tue 16-Oct-12 02:05 AM

>When the D300 was introduced, I decided its specs did not
>warrant an upgrade from the D200. I upgraded instead to a D700
>when it became available, since this camera represents a very
>significant improvement versus the D200/D300. Similarly, I
>also will not upgrade to a D600/D800, since they don't meet my
>criteria for a worthwhile upgrade from the D700. My advice to
>you is to get a good used D700 and apply the money you save to
>an FX zoom or prime lens. The bodies of the D200 and D700 are
>quite similar.


A few of us indeed didn't like the D300 because it didn't drastically improve image quality...the D100 to D200 was a much bigger leap than D200 to D300, imho. But for others, the D300 was a huge upgrade from D200, D2-series, or other bodies.

Nikon user since 2000

A general, generic topic D200 vs d300s [View all] , lgasaway Silver Member , Mon 08-Oct-12 01:05 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
1
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
2
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
3
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
4
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
5
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
6
     Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
7
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
8
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
9
Reply message RE: D200 vs d300s
10