>D3s/x are too expensive, >and D600 isn't too attractive personally speaking, due to a >few key missing features/specs. Nor are the D2H/x attractive >anymore as far as I'm concerned (low light/high ISO being the >reason).
Not to veer TOO far off the subject, but this statement intrigues me. What is it you feel is missing in the D600 for it to be useful for sports? We can take this private if the mods feel it dilutes the thread too much.