Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
blw

Richmond, US
28573 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to send message via AOL IM

"RE: D2?"

blw Moderator Awarded for his high level of expertise in various areas Nikonian since 18th Jun 2004
Mon 05-Nov-12 07:08 PM

Having used the D2x and D2h together a lot, I'd say that the AF differences are as near to zero as I can account. The frame rates are drastically higher with the D2h - so if that's what your requirement is, there's a very clear choice. Other than that, I'd go with the D2x or D2xs. As noted above there's little operational difference between a 2x and a 2xs other than the LCD.

In theory the D2h goes higher in ISO, but in practice not so much. The noise is better controlled on the D2x, and by the time you end up with something headed to the printer, the nominal 2-stop difference has mostly disappeared. They're both pretty noisy by today's standards, unless they're near base ISO.

_____
Brian... a bicoastal Nikonian and Team Member

My gallery is online. Comments and critique welcomed any time!

A topic tagged as having a question D2? [View all] , Scotty Silver Member , Mon 05-Nov-12 12:02 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D2?
1
Reply message RE: D2?
2
Reply message RE: D2?
3
     Reply message RE: D2?
4
          Reply message RE: D2?
5
          Reply message RE: D2?
6
               Reply message RE: D2?
7
               Reply message RE: D2?
8
Reply message RE: D2? Update
9
Reply message RE: D2? Update
10
Reply message RE: D2? Update
11
Reply message RE: D2? Update
12
Reply message RE: D2? Update
13
Reply message RE: D2? Update
14