Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar

rutherfordphoto

Vancouver, CA
5099 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar"

rutherfordphoto Awarded for his article contributions to the Resources Registered since 27th Aug 2002
Wed 02-Nov-05 01:44 AM

I use Lexar exclusively, they have never failed in the line of duty. When one did fail, they replaced it instantly with the fast write speed card.

The lifetime guarantee is nice, and good piece of mind. I have put them through the laundry, and there was still images

I don't get hung up on all the speed issues, 80x is fast enough, especially with Nikon's buffers

Sandisk are good, and not sure about Kingston, I know of a couple that have failed.

Allan, A Comox Valley Nikonian
Find out more about me on the Nikonians Team Page

~Cheers, Allan~
www.allanschroeder.com

A general, generic topic Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar [View all] , jrhone , Tue 01-Nov-05 04:27 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
1
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
2
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
3
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
5
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
6
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
4
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
7
Reply message RE: Kingston vs. Sandisk vs. Lexar
8