Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

16-35mm vs wide-angle prime

nrothschild

US
10916 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime"

nrothschild Neil is an expert in several areas, including camera support Registered since 25th Jul 2004
Mon 18-Feb-13 10:45 PM

If you step up to the rim of the Grand Canyon your eye sees a grand scene. An unbelievable scene.

Shoot it at 16mm FX without carefully thinking about the forground, and you can easily end up with a very mundane scene that your eyes saw very differently. All the grand detail is so tiny (because it is very distant) that it is very difficult to make a coherent and attention riveting scene.

If you could find a very interesting rock with unusual erosion lines, in just the right light, at the rim of the canyon, and get very close to that foreground subjectthen you can start to make a nice image out of it.

That "rule" can be broken, and when I see it done with the Grand Canyon I always study the image to try to figure out how it was done.
I use the Grand Canyon because it is the stereotypical example of the ultra-wide angle problem, and oft quoted. But it is true with most or all subjects.

This has nothing to do with sharpness or distortion, or other "lens quality" issues. It is purely a matter of perspective.

Some people find ultra-wide shooting relatively easy and adjust rapidly. Others have to think hard about it and many struggle for years with it.

_________________________________
Neil


my Nikonians gallery.

This is a hot, active topic! 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime [View all] , bluerose , Sun 17-Feb-13 04:55 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
1
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
2
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
3
     Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
4
     Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
6
     Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
8
     Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
30
          Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
35
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
5
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
7
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
9
     Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
10
          Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
11
               Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
12
                    Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
13
                    Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
16
                         Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
19
                         Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
34
                    Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
14
                         Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
15
                         Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
17
                              Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
18
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
20
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
21
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
22
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
24
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
25
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
26
     Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
27
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
33
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
36
     Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
37
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
28
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
29
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
31
Reply message RE: 16-35mm vs wide-angle prime
32