Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D

jbloom

Wethersfield, US
7735 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D"

jbloom Gold Member Awarded for the continuous and generous sharing of his high level expertise and his always encouraging comments in several forums. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Nikonian since 15th Jul 2004
Tue 15-Jan-13 11:38 PM

Ah, that explains it. I've wondered why the AF 28/2.8 had such terrible reputation in some circles since I never thought mine was THAT bad. But I have the D version. (That said, mine doesn't get mounted much because when I want to mount a small, wide prime it's generally the AF 24/2.8D.)

-- Jon
Wethersfield, CT, USA
Connecticut High School Sports Photos

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D [View all] , kshapero Gold Member , Tue 15-Jan-13 07:31 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
1
Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
2
Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
3
     Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
4
     Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
5
Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
6
Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
7
Reply message RE: 28/2.8 AF-D vs. 24/2.8 AF-D
8