Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife

cho10

portsmouth, nh, US
79 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife"

cho10 Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd Jul 2010
Mon 14-Jan-13 04:02 PM

Thanks a million!!

I had thought along those lines but was curious to see whether anybody had tried this lens for wildlife. I posted my original request to see what a current user of that lens might have to say.

My idea is that even at 15 meters (45 feet) a 135 F/2.0 should be of use when the available light is very very low. Any image then seen at 100% in Lightroom should allow for cropping a decent sized usable portion. When I eventually decide to move to a D800 the huge 36MB images should be usable even moreso that with the ones I get from the D700.

For wildlife I always have a sturdy mono-pod with me too. As I said the 80-200 F/2.8D did not satisfy me and while I do think that the 70-200 VRII F/2.8 is probably better in rapidly diminishing light at the Equator, I am hoping that the 135 will be more useful for my specific need.

When I photographed polar bears from a tundra buggy in northern Manitoba I had a 300 F/2.8 and a Sigma 150-500mm that I had on loan (which I hardly used for a number of reasons). When I needed greater reach the 1.4 and 2.0 TC's with the 300mm were very useful. I have the TC2.0 III that has never let me down and which I assume will work with the 135.

On some occasions I have had to lug around over 20 kg (44lbs) of gear but there are instances in which all you want is - say - 3 or 4 kg (no more than 10lbs). The mono-pod can also be an excellent walking aid. Even a Lowepro waterproof camera bag can be too heavy at times.

Claude


CHO10
Claude H. Ostfeld
Visit my Nikonians gallery.

This is a hot, active topic! Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife [View all] , cho10 Silver Member , Mon 14-Jan-13 09:58 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
1
Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
2
Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
3
     Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
4
          Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
6
               Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
7
Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
5
Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
8
     Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
9
     Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
10
          Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
11
               Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
12
                    Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
14
                         Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
16
                         Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
19
                         Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
20
                              Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
21
                                   Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
22
                                        Reply message -offRE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
23
Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
13
Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
15
Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
17
Reply message RE: Nikon 135 F/2.0 for wildlife
18