Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
ericbowles

Atlanta, US
10552 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Quality of glass"

ericbowles Moderator Awarded for his in-depth knowledge and high level skills in various areas, especially Landscape and Wildlife Photoghraphy Writer Ribbon awarded for for his article contributions to the community Donor Ribbon awarded for his very generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Nikonian since 25th Nov 2005
Wed 19-Dec-12 11:22 AM

Looking at the 80-200 f/2.8 vs. the new 70-200 f/4, I would expect the new design and coatings to be better in terms of image quality, but the loss of a stop is another thing.

The area where some older lenses may still outperform new lenses would be some top of the line primes. Some of the older prime lenses are known for fabulous image quality. Where they may fall down is the lack of coatings to manage reflections and chromatic aberration.

While there are some very good DX lenses - and some real bargains - most are designed for a specific price point with compromises as needed to keep cost down. It would be great to see some new high quality DX lenses.

Eric Bowles
Nikonians Team
My Gallery
Workshops

Nikonians membership — my most important photographic investment, after the camera

A general, generic topic Quality of glass [View all] , danshep Gold Member , Wed 19-Dec-12 04:30 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Quality of glass
1
Reply message RE: Quality of glass
2
Reply message RE: Quality of glass
3
Reply message RE: Quality of glass
4
Reply message RE: Quality of glass
5