Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.
Already have an account? Login
"RE: The new 70-200 f4"
I own the 2.8 and had a 4.0 at home for 48 hours a couple of weeks back.IMO it is really simple. If you have a quantifiable NEED for 2.8 to stop the motion or best use with teleconverters then great.For walking around or anyone else the 4.0 makes MUCH more sense, not because of the savings, but because it is so much more compact and light without a compromise on IQ.If I didn't already have the 2.8 I'd buy the 4.0 without question (I have the other two 4.0 zooms). Any maybe when the launch price reduces I'll sell the 2.8 and make the swap.I have 1.8 primes for the low light needs that I have, others have different needs.If you need 2.8 you'll know it, otherwise it's just gear envy
Regards, RayVisit: My Nikonians Gallery
Visit my Nikonians gallery.