Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
Bravozulu

Los Angeles, US
762 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: 18-105 vs 16-85"

Bravozulu Registered since 04th Jun 2012
Sun 23-Sep-12 12:25 AM

On a DX camera, the 16-85 gives you the FOV equivalent of a 24mm film lens. That wide angle is indispensable if you will be shooting indoor, especially while photographing a group of people. Of my six Nikon film lenses, the 24 saw the 2nd most use, after the 50mm 'normal' lens.

At the other end of the range, you would have to weigh your typical subject matter against the two options of maximum telephoto. There's not a compelling advantage to 105mm vs 85, in my experience. Both will do portraits at 60mm. That's a kind of benchmark focal length for portraits.

I've got the 16-85, and also a 60mm ED Micro and 12-24. Both the 16-85 and 12-24 are handy at parties and small events.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic 18-105 vs 16-85 [View all] , SabreFlyr Gold Member , Thu 13-Sep-12 11:18 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
1
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
2
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
3
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
4
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
6
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
7
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
5
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
8
          Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
9