Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
sabbey51

Saddle River, US
649 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: 18-105 vs 16-85"

sabbey51 Gold Member Nikonian since 10th Jan 2010
Wed 19-Sep-12 12:43 AM

I have the 11-16 along with the 16-85, with the latter spending the most time on my camera. With the 18-200 which preceded the 16-85, I found myself switching to the 11-16 more often (or not, and not getting the shot I really wanted due to my laziness). But it all depends on your vision and whether you see wide or long ...

I never have shot with the 18-105, but I found the 16-85 noticeably sharper than the 18-200 at the same FL in good light.

A general, generic topic 18-105 vs 16-85 [View all] , SabreFlyr Gold Member , Thu 13-Sep-12 11:18 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
1
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
2
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
3
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
4
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
6
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
7
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
5
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
8
          Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
9