Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
SabreFlyr

Marion, IN, US
148 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: 18-105 vs 16-85"

SabreFlyr Gold Member Nikonian since 10th Jul 2009
Fri 14-Sep-12 12:39 AM

Thanks so much! Unfortunately, I missed the earlier thread because I scanned instead of truly searching (I tend to do a rather poor job of structuring my searches).

Thanks for pointing out the M/A focus which I would love to have on what would be my main lens. And, I hadn't given a thought to the lack of a distance scale. I don't do a lot of night photography but it's a consideration. The 16-85 would also dovetail better with my Tokina 11-16. I had also missed that the 16-85 is VRII whereas the 18-105 is not. Another plus.

I think my decision is made!

Ray

A general, generic topic 18-105 vs 16-85 [View all] , SabreFlyr Gold Member , Thu 13-Sep-12 11:18 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
1
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
2
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
3
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
4
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
6
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
7
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
5
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
8
          Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
9