Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
SabreFlyr

Marion, IN, US
148 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: 18-105 vs 16-85"

SabreFlyr Gold Member Nikonian since 10th Jul 2009
Thu 13-Sep-12 01:23 PM

I should add that I lean toward landscape and have dabbled in some shorebird photography (which I have very little opportunity for in my location). So, I've got the 11-16 for the former and the 70-300 for the latter. I am trying to lighten the travel bag as we'll be doing an Alaska cruise next summer.

Ray

A general, generic topic 18-105 vs 16-85 [View all] , SabreFlyr Gold Member , Thu 13-Sep-12 11:18 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
1
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
2
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
3
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
4
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
6
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
7
Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
5
     Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
8
          Reply message RE: 18-105 vs 16-85
9