Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

WA image quality comparison

jadiniz

Estoril, PT
350 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: WA image quality comparison"

jadiniz Registered since 25th Dec 2010
Sun 09-Sep-12 08:05 PM

I once compared an 18-105 to a 20 f2.8 prime. Aperture by aperture... the zoom won the sharpness test all over the frame. Plus, f3.5 with VR against f2.8... in my book the zoom won again. Plus, being paid for, as opposed to buying, guess what: I kept the zoom and went happy about it.

http://egozarolho.blogspot.com
1. Good content, good aesthetics and good tecnique. On that order.
2. Light is more important than glass and pixels.
3. In the digital photography process, software is as important as gear.

A topic tagged as having a question WA image quality comparison [View all] , JohnPlev , Sat 08-Sep-12 09:56 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
1
Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
2
     Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
3
          Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
4
               Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
5
                    Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
6
                         Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
7