Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

WA image quality comparison

Captain Rich

Savannah, US
1277 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: WA image quality comparison"

Captain Rich Silver Member Nikonian since 25th May 2006
Sun 09-Sep-12 12:52 PM

I'm afraid you have just identified the one weakness of DX. There just aren't any really wide, fast primes. I used a Nikon 12-24 when I shot DX and I think it was really good. But not terribly fast at f/4. Fast enough with the newer sensors, but not exceptional like what you can get in the FX world where both really wide and very fast are achievable (you can use the same lenses on DX, but they aren't wide - just sort of wide). It's what finally drove me to FX. But I do miss the lighter weight and smaller size that DX offers.

Rich

A topic tagged as having a question WA image quality comparison [View all] , JohnPlev , Sat 08-Sep-12 09:56 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
1
Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
2
     Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
3
          Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
4
               Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
5
                    Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
6
                         Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
7