Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

WA image quality comparison

JohnPlev

US
4 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: WA image quality comparison"

JohnPlev Registered since 08th Aug 2012
Sun 09-Sep-12 03:41 AM

I was in Vegas when my 18-200 stopped working, so I started using my 50 1.8 AF D.
It was great shooting a fast lens. The photos were sharp with excellent contrast. The only inconvenience was that the 50 mm wasn't wide enough.

I tried a Sigma 15-30 but found the lens cumbersome and the images too soft for my liking. My preference is to purchase a wide prime that is light for travel, fast & sharp like the 50mm.

A topic tagged as having a question WA image quality comparison [View all] , JohnPlev , Sat 08-Sep-12 09:56 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
1
Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
2
     Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
3
          Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
4
               Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
5
                    Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
6
                         Reply message RE: WA image quality comparison
7