Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

105mm MF vs. 105mm AF

briantilley

Paignton, UK
30235 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF"

briantilley Gold Member Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Donor Ribbon awarded for his support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003
Sun 09-Sep-12 07:55 AM

Dimitri may be right about that, but as I've not used any of the MF 105mm Nikkors I can't compare the lenses directly. All I will say is that I'm happy to use my AF-S 105mm f/2.8 VR on distant subjects as well as for macro work.

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

A general, generic topic 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF [View all] , pqtrths Silver Member Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 , Tue 28-Aug-12 01:06 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF
1
Reply message RE: 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF
2
Reply message RE: 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF
3
Reply message RE: 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF
4
Reply message RE: 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF
5
Reply message RE: 105mm MF vs. 105mm AF
6