Lens setting for copying slides
Tue 23-Feb-21 03:49 PM
Visit my Nikonians gallery.
|
-
-
#3. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 1
Wed 24-Feb-21 11:06 AMyes I had heard it was hard to get but I put in a backorder with B&H and had it in 10 days. They must have gotten a shipment after I placed the order that was big enough to clear all backorders. I really like the setup.Visit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#2. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 0
Strada_Facendo
Registered since 06th Jun 2017
Tue 23-Feb-21 10:41 PM
There are two things to keep in mind. One is optimal lens performance, and the other is optimal depth of field.
The focus distance is very short so the DoF is very shallow, especially at larger apertures. If the film is even a tiny bit curved, or the negative holder is even a tiny bit loose in the ES-2 so the negative is not perpendicular to the sensor, or your focus is even a tiny bit off, the DoF at f/5.6 may not be enough to keep the whole film, or even any of it, in acceptable focus.
My experience with the ES-2 using a D500 and the 40/2.8 DX is that f/8 gives more reliable results because of the DoF issue.
The focus distance is very short so the DoF is very shallow, especially at larger apertures. If the film is even a tiny bit curved, or the negative holder is even a tiny bit loose in the ES-2 so the negative is not perpendicular to the sensor, or your focus is even a tiny bit off, the DoF at f/5.6 may not be enough to keep the whole film, or even any of it, in acceptable focus.
My experience with the ES-2 using a D500 and the 40/2.8 DX is that f/8 gives more reliable results because of the DoF issue.
"I don't want to show things, but to give people the desire to see." Agnes Varda
-
#4. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 2
Wed 24-Feb-21 12:22 PM | edited Wed 24-Feb-21 12:34 PM by Jamed600I measured and have only 2" from the lens to film plane so your point is well taken. I will change to f8.0. Don't know what DoF will be but hopefully enough.
A lens used to come with a depth of field matrix- f stop vs distance. Are you aware of a Nikon resource that provides that for all of their lenses?
Thanks, JimBVisit my Nikonians gallery.
-
-
#6. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 5
Wed 24-Feb-21 02:51 PMCarl, Thanks
Interesting, Ill try it. My images done so far are pretty good but not as sharp as I would like. Not sure if it is 50 year old Film, camera or 25 year old operator (at that time)- Probably all the proceeding.
JimBVisit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#9. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 6
jarvicj Registered since 04th Jun 2004Thu 25-Feb-21 10:15 AMThe amazing part to me about copying old slides is the amount of information one can still pull out with overexposing shades and under exposing the blown out skies, followed by stacking later. While sharp images are desired I think of the equipment (cameras and lenses) I used 40-50 years ago and some “softness” is to be expected, but there are some sharp gems as well.
Carl
-
-
-
#7. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 4
Thu 25-Feb-21 06:42 AM
> I measured and have only 2" from the lens to film
>plane so your point is well taken. I will change to f8.0.
>Don't know what DoF will be but hopefully enough.
>
>A lens used to come with a depth of field matrix- f stop vs
>distance. Are you aware of a Nikon resource that provides
>that for all of their lenses?
>
>Thanks, JimB
If the lens was new, the info is in the book provided with the lens. It is on the last few pages.I
Otherwise try Nikon Downloads for the pdf version.
https://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/products/239/AF-S_Micro_NIKKOR_60mm_f_28G_ED.html
DG
>plane so your point is well taken. I will change to f8.0.
>Don't know what DoF will be but hopefully enough.
>
>A lens used to come with a depth of field matrix- f stop vs
>distance. Are you aware of a Nikon resource that provides
>that for all of their lenses?
>
>Thanks, JimB
If the lens was new, the info is in the book provided with the lens. It is on the last few pages.I
Otherwise try Nikon Downloads for the pdf version.
https://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/products/239/AF-S_Micro_NIKKOR_60mm_f_28G_ED.html
DG
Visit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#10. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 7
Thu 25-Feb-21 11:07 AMDave,
I bought the lens used so didn't get a manual. I was talking about my new S lenses (24-70,14-24) those manuals give close focus but not DoF matrix. I figured the 60 micro was the same.
Thanks for direction to the Nikon download site; that's great and will probably help me with the new lenses.
JimBVisit my Nikonians gallery.
#8. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 4
Thu 25-Feb-21 09:09 AM | edited Thu 25-Feb-21 09:09 AM by elec164
> I measured and have only 2" from the lens to film
>plane so your point is well taken. I will change to f8.0.
>Don't know what DoF will be but hopefully enough.
The working distance is not what you want, the focus distance is (film plane to sensor distance). According to the manual linked by Dave it's 7.29" at 1:1 reproduction ratio.
>A lens used to come with a depth of field matrix- f stop vs
>distance. Are you aware of a Nikon resource that provides
>that for all of their lenses?
According to the chart in the manual, at 1:1 even at f/32 you only have about 1/16" DOF. Hardly enough to matter much I would think but better then nothing I guess.
>plane so your point is well taken. I will change to f8.0.
>Don't know what DoF will be but hopefully enough.
The working distance is not what you want, the focus distance is (film plane to sensor distance). According to the manual linked by Dave it's 7.29" at 1:1 reproduction ratio.
>A lens used to come with a depth of field matrix- f stop vs
>distance. Are you aware of a Nikon resource that provides
>that for all of their lenses?
According to the chart in the manual, at 1:1 even at f/32 you only have about 1/16" DOF. Hardly enough to matter much I would think but better then nothing I guess.
Pete
Visit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#11. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 8
Thu 25-Feb-21 11:24 AM | edited Thu 25-Feb-21 12:14 PM by Jamed600Pete,
Thanks, I measured (as best I could) and it appears film plane to slide is about 7 5/16 so that's pretty close.
In terms of DoF even the slightest touch to the barrel and its out of focus. At f11 sure my DoF is less than 1/16. I'm rechecking focus at 100% for each slide.
Finally opened the online manual (I never think about an online resource, I come from a paper age) and at f11 my DoF range is from 7-5/16 to 7-5/16!!
JimBVisit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#12. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 11
Thu 25-Feb-21 12:36 PM | edited Thu 25-Feb-21 06:45 PM by elec164>Pete,
>
>Thanks, I measured (as best I could) and it appears film plane
>to slide is about 7 5/16 so that's pretty close.
>
>In terms of DoF even the slightest touch to the barrel and its
>out of focus. At f11 sure my DoF is less than 1/16. I'm
>rechecking focus at 100% for each slide.
From my understanding the ES-2 is designed to hold the slide/film at the minimum focus distance of the macro lens (adapters are needed depending on which 60mm you are using). So theoretically you would set the lens for minimum focus distance. But not having used one I have no practical experience on how that would actually work out. I know when I have shot at 1:1 I set the lens to minimum focus distance and use a focus rail.
>Finally opened the online manual (I never think about an
>online resource, I come from a paper age) and at f11 my DoF
>range is from 7-5/16 to 7-5/16!!
Yeah, when at 1:1 distance those online DOF tables are useless. You need to use a macro DOF calculator such as this one by PhotoPills (but unfortunately it doesn't allow you to set the actual 1:1 focus distance for that lens). Also don't forget that at macro distance the DOF is spilt 50/50. So if the DOF is 1/16" that is only 1/32" in front and back.
edited to add:
After watching a few how to video's I see my understanding was incorrect. It appears that the ES-2 probably holds the film/slides slightly further away then the minimum focus distance (perhaps to allow for tolerance errors?). So focusing is needed. Seems split between using autofocus and using live view.Pete
Visit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#13. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 0
Fri 26-Feb-21 10:07 AM
I am using my AF Micro Nikkor 60mm f2.8 D with the ES-2 adapter and I am getting great results with my D850, and lit with an LED panel. I went with f5.6. I mounted the lot on a desktop tripod, a monster by Induro, which is rock solid. I shoot with the WR-R10 wireless trigger, in manual exposure and and I am not concerned about shutter speed as the whole thing is rock steady.
Chief problem is dust on transparencies or on old negatives.
FYI I got the ES-2 on Amazon
Chief problem is dust on transparencies or on old negatives.
FYI I got the ES-2 on Amazon
GH
#14. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 0
Fri 26-Feb-21 11:49 AM
Jim,
Vincent Versace did a video on using the ES-2. He used f8 with the 60mm lens. Here is a link to it.
-6Zg_3lf&index=2
Gary
Vincent Versace did a video on using the ES-2. He used f8 with the 60mm lens. Here is a link to it.
-6Zg_3lf&index=2
Gary
Visit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#15. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 14
Fri 26-Feb-21 02:23 PMThank you, this is very helpful :hugging_face:
Christian,
www.flickr.com/photos/cfphotographs/
www.ChristianFritschi.com
Welcome to my Portfolio:
https://www.nikonians.org/portfolio/ChristianF -
#16. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 14
Sat 27-Feb-21 12:02 PM | edited Sat 27-Feb-21 12:05 PM by Jamed600Gary,
Versace video very helpful and a good compliment to Hudson Henry's. Between the two I feel Ive got a good understanding of the process. I hadn't thought of focus peaking. My two big areas of frustration have been slide cleaning and achieving focus with almost no DoF. His info on cleaning materials and process will help. Also focus peaking may reduce eye strain and give a better result.
Lastly, I think HH said to put the emulsion side toward the light. Couldn't understand why my images reversed in LR (no problem correcting but Id rather do it right the first time)
Thanks for the video, JimBVisit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#17. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 16
Sat 27-Feb-21 01:12 PMJim,
I noticed the difference about the the emulsion side direction between Versace and HH too. I'm still scanning photos from the 1930s, 40s & 50s. The slides will be next. What have you done for slide cleaning?
GaryVisit my Nikonians gallery.
-
#18. "RE: Lens setting for copying slides" | In response to Reply # 17
Sun 28-Feb-21 11:03 AMSo far just basic- wipe with soft brush then micro fibre and blow off with Rocket blower. I haven't gotten to negatives yet but am ordering the items Versace recommends. Dust and "schmutz" (love it) a problem with my early 60s slides but not so much with 80s on- those are coming out quite clean.
As recommended by HH I tried to download Negative Lab Pro but LR wouldn't accept it. Not sure why but I'll pursue that next week.
We did 20s-50s pics last year making books of family history for our kids/grandkids. I wasn't satisfied with my scanning equipment/skill so had those done commercially (not cheap).
With the 60 micro at 1;1 there is no DoF and i've found it hard to focus exactly. Ive moved the slide holder out on its barrel about 1/2" and gone to f11. I am now able to do a much better job on focus. This puts me at about 1:125. I can see the outline of the slide holder. I am setting exposure according to the histogram so may be underexposing. Will check after i finish the first tray of slides.
JimBVisit my Nikonians gallery.
-
-
G
Upload images
6
Uploading and including images in forums available to members on Silver membership level or higher. Please upgrade to take full advantage.
I have never used a 60 micro; bought it used from KEH so not sure what the sweet spot is but thought f5.6 should be close.
JimB