Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D800 topic #17543
View in linear mode

Subject: "Is the amount of USM in PS sufficient still?" Previous topic | Next topic
ZoneV Silver Member Nikonian since 08th Jan 2005Mon 01-Oct-12 06:26 PM
3251 posts Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
"Poll question: Is the amount of USM in PS sufficient still?"


US
          

Another real-world question for D800 users, but this one is about post processing.

Now that you have a D800, how do you feel about the amount slider in Photoshop for the unsharp mask tool? Is 500% still enough, or would you like to see the limit increased in a future version of Adobe PS?

Poll result (0 votes)
Yes, 500% has been enough in every case. (0 votes)Vote
No. I've had instances with D800 files where I've needed more than 500%. (0 votes)Vote

  

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic

klrbee25 Silver Member Nikonian since 03rd Jun 2006Mon 01-Oct-12 09:20 PM
1380 posts Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#1. "RE: Is the amount of USM in PS sufficient still?"
In response to Reply # 0
Mon 01-Oct-12 09:23 PM by klrbee25

Chicago, US
          

First, the threshold value doesn't even make sense to me. 500% of what? Stupid measure if you ask me.

Second, the radius adjustment can very quickly increase the amount of perceived sharpening. If your radius is set to a tiny number (say 0.3), then 500% may not be enough on any image from any camera. Bump the radius up to 3 and then 500% is hideous looking. I recall reading somewhere long ago that a radius of ~1.8 was a good starting point for a 12MP image. But it's not a linear response, so 5.4 doesn't look to good on the D800 images if I recall.

I'd argue that if you find 500% to be insufficient, you're not using an appropriate radius value. Or you just need to rerun the sharpening algorithm a second or third time since the results cumulative. Some photographers have very elaborate sharpening approaches that use multiple passes with differing settings rather than a one-stop-shop approach that most people apply.


-Alex Rosen
www.flickr.com/photos/klrbee25/

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

emi_fiend Gold Member Nikonian since 28th Jan 2006Mon 01-Oct-12 10:56 PM
223 posts Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#2. "RE: Is the amount of USM in PS sufficient still?"
In response to Reply # 0


Poway, US
          

Consider using a 2-step sharpening process to get the maximum resolution (first do modest sharpening followed by sharpening the sharpened image). On the web you can find people recommending this. Jason Odell uses Capture NX2 and recommends a 2-step process, the first one using High-Pass sharpening, the second one using USM.

http://www.luminescentphoto.com/blog/2012/06/29/get-sharp-with-the-nikon-d800/#more-2399

Jim

a San Diego Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D800 topic #17543 Previous topic | Next topic


Take the Nikonians Tour and learn more about being a Nikonian Wiki /FAQ /Help Listen to our MP3 photography radio channels Find anything on Nikon and imaging technology - fast!

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2013
All Rights Reserved

Nikonians®, NikoScope® and NikoniansAcademy™ are trademarks owned by Nikonians.org.
Nikon®, Nikonos® and Nikkor® are registered trademarks of Nikon Corporation.