#1. "RE: D7000 Dynamic range..." In response to Reply # 0
Indeed, TWO thumbs up, I find nothing lousy about this image, except for some distorsion (and those damn wires). BTW, which lens did you use, if I may ask?
http://egozarolho.blogspot.com 1. Good content, good aesthetics and good tecnique. On that order. 2. Light is more important than glass and pixels. 3. In the digital photography process, software is as important as gear.
#2. "RE: D7000 Dynamic range..." In response to Reply # 0
I think the shot is initially a bit freaky looking because the subject combined with wide angle perspective distortion looks a lot like a Google StreetView capture. Then all the fine details begin to appear along with a completely natural looking sky and a complete absence of blowouts. The D7000 combined with an optically clean lens exceeds, by far, many of the technical capabilities of pro Nikon bodies of just a few years ago.
Somebody send this shot to the Google StreetView people. I guarantee they'll be buying D7000 bodies and Nikkor 16-85 VR lenses immediately thereafter.
#6. "RE: D7000 Dynamic range..." In response to Reply # 0
Gold Coast, AU
Here's something that confuses me. I didn't think active D Lighting made any difference to RAW files. Did you convert to JPEG using Nikon software and would that make any difference? I use RAW and Lightroom/Camera Raw and never set active D lighting. I did have a go at a few test shots with and without ADL but couldn't notice any difference.