Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D7100, D7000 (Public) topic #25274
View in linear mode

Subject: "D7100 vs D600 - high ISO" Previous topic | Next topic
Toby01 Silver Member Nikonian since 19th Nov 2012Sun 17-Mar-13 01:09 AM
229 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
"D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"


El Sobrante, US
          

I know it is very early days just now, but if anyone has both a D7100 and a D600, I would be very interested in a few shots of the same subjects at the same ISO's (3200 and 6400 would be nice) with high_ISO NR turned off. I had planned to get the D600, but opted for the D7100 because of its more widely spread autofocus detector layout. Even if the D7100 is up to 2 stops worse than the D600, I'll be a happy camper. I have played with a friend's D600 and was very impressed with it at 6400, but its AF detector layout was just too centered for my taste. Thanks to anyone who can provide samples from both cameras.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
jonmcguffin
17th Mar 2013
1
Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
PaintedRays Silver Member
17th Mar 2013
3
Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
PaintedRays Silver Member
17th Mar 2013
4
Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
dm1dave Administrator
17th Mar 2013
5
     Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
Toby01 Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
18
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
Ronald_D7100
18th Mar 2013
19
Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
PaintedRays Silver Member
17th Mar 2013
6
     Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
jonmcguffin
17th Mar 2013
7
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
dm1dave Administrator
17th Mar 2013
8
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
billD80 Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
10
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
jonmcguffin
18th Mar 2013
11
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
dm1dave Administrator
18th Mar 2013
15
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
jonmcguffin
18th Mar 2013
16
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
PaintedRays Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
17
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
RRRoger Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
12
               Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
jonmcguffin
18th Mar 2013
13
               Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
RRRoger Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
14
                    Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
billD80 Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
20
               Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
ardoluc
24th Mar 2013
29
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
kuzzy Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
9
Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
VR8 Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
21
Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
JPJ Silver Member
18th Mar 2013
22
     Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
jonmcguffin
18th Mar 2013
23
          Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
torwood Silver Member
19th Mar 2013
24
               Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
RRRoger Silver Member
19th Mar 2013
25
                    Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
torwood Silver Member
19th Mar 2013
26
                         Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
RRRoger Silver Member
19th Mar 2013
27
                              Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
Pugzilla Gold Member
22nd Mar 2013
28
                                   Reply message RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO
KnightPhoto Gold Member
25th Mar 2013
30

jonmcguffin Registered since 16th Mar 2013Sun 17-Mar-13 02:12 AM
23 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#1. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 0


US
          

So here are a couple of links you may find useful for viewing some higher ISO images. No, they're not a direct comparison to a D600, but considering the D600's got a FF sensor, there just isn't any way possible the D7100 is going to match it.

http://www.photographyblog.com/previews/nikon_d7100_photos/

and

http://www.flickr.com/photos/31204622@N02/with/8554815568/#photo_8554815568

I own a D700 and a D7000, the D7100 is due to be here on Tuesday (looking to sell the 7000). I've been a bit concerned that the ISO performance would be worse than the D7000, but from what I can tell around the web, that doesn't appear to be the case at all.

Thom Hogan seems to think we'll see a 1-stop difference between the D600 & D7100 and I'd consider that pretty good. Translation, the D7100 might be as good as my D700 FF camera. That would be impressive.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

PaintedRays Silver Member Nikonian since 25th Oct 2011Sun 17-Mar-13 05:45 PM
81 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#3. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 0
Sun 17-Mar-13 05:47 PM by PaintedRays

Oregon, US
          

Okay Brian, I ran a test. These shots were framed similarly, both cameras using the 105mm VR Micro at f/11, auto ISO under mixed window light and incandescent lights. Aperture priority, NR off. You'll know the D600 by the dirty sensor (BTW, the D7100 sensor is very clean after the 1st 100 shots). Tripod used, spot focus. I had to drop the exposure on the D600 to get a similar level of blinkies flashing. The 1st shot will be the D600 each time.

Here is ISO6400...







...And here is ISO3200...







...And here is ISO1600







I'd have included a 100% crop, but I'm not sure how to know when I crop to 100% without it being a guess. I'll send you the jpg's if you want them.

www.paintedrays.com

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)
Attachment #3, (jpg file)
Attachment #4, (jpg file)
Attachment #5, (jpg file)
Attachment #6, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
PaintedRays Silver Member Nikonian since 25th Oct 2011Sun 17-Mar-13 05:53 PM
81 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#4. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 3


Oregon, US
          

Interestingly, I ran this test twice because in ViewNX2 it says the High ISO NR = ON(LOW). Both cameras were double checked the second time as HIGH ISO NR = OFF. There is a glitch from Nikon on the transfer of the file. Nikon Transfer was used.

www.paintedrays.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Sun 17-Mar-13 07:10 PM
11281 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#5. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 4


Lowden, US
          

High ISO Noise Reduction is automatically applied to any image over ISO-1250. This is common on all Nikon bodies for example - the D800 automatically applies High ISO NR starting at ISO-1600.

Page 228 states...

OFF = noise reduction is only preformed at ISO 1250 and higher ... the amount is less than the low setting.

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Toby01 Silver Member Nikonian since 19th Nov 2012Mon 18-Mar-13 03:41 AM
229 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#18. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 5


El Sobrante, US
          

Thanks for the ISO 6400 crops. I can see that the D7100 exhibits more and 'coarser' noise than the D600, but not by as much as I expected. On the other hand, I 'think' I see sharper edge definition on the leaves in the D7100 shot. These are very interesting examples. My D7100 is supposed to arrive on Tuesday, so I can't wait to try it out. It will be fun to see how shots from the D7100 at ISO 6400 look with a bit of judicious NR in PP. This ought to be fun!

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Ronald_D7100 Registered since 24th Feb 2013Mon 18-Mar-13 08:47 AM
3 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#19. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 18


NL
          

Interesting to compare, whilst I'm awaiting my copy of the D7100 is reassuring to see that with these kind of camera's you never can blame the camera for a bad shot!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
PaintedRays Silver Member Nikonian since 25th Oct 2011Sun 17-Mar-13 07:58 PM
81 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#6. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 3
Sun 17-Mar-13 08:06 PM by PaintedRays

Oregon, US
          

Here are crops of the above ISo6400 images only.

D600 - 100% crop ISO6400


D7100 - 100% crop ISO 6400


www.paintedrays.com

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
jonmcguffin Registered since 16th Mar 2013Sun 17-Mar-13 08:06 PM
23 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#7. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 6


US
          

>Here are crops of the above ISo6400 images only.
>
>D600 - 100% crop ISO6400
>
>
>D7100 - 100% crop ISO 6400
>
>
>The D7100 shows more detail but the D600 has more pleasing
>noise, Bokeh.

Wow, is it just me or does the DX sensor seem to be holding its own against the FF D600?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Sun 17-Mar-13 10:54 PM
11281 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#8. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 7


Lowden, US
          

They are pretty close with the D600 coming in just a bit smoother.

I think it would be difficult see the difference in prints up to 12” x 18” or so. Even with prints as large as 20” x 30” you would probably need to compare prints side by side to be able to tell difference.

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
billD80 Silver Member Nikonian since 22nd Jan 2007Mon 18-Mar-13 12:23 AM
2141 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#10. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 8


US
          

>They are pretty close with the D600 coming in just a bit
>smoother.
>
>I think it would be difficult see the difference in prints up
>to 12” x 18” or so. Even with prints as large as 20” x 30” you
>would probably need to compare prints side by side to be able
>to tell difference.
>

I see the detail in the D7100 as being sharper, hence a tad more noisiness too. Note the small odd shaped "objects" in the images. They seem more defined in the D7100 image. Is the AA filter on the D600 blurring these?

Would results from a D600 without the AA filter look identical to those from the D7100?

www.billkeane.zenfolio.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
jonmcguffin Registered since 16th Mar 2013Mon 18-Mar-13 12:54 AM
23 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#11. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 10


US
          

I feel as though maybe I'm missing something here. There's no real possible way that the D7100 is performing as well (virtually) as the D600 in low noise is there?

That would be revolutionary; making the D7100 do to the D7000 what the D3s did to the D3.

Is that possible?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Mon 18-Mar-13 02:39 AM
11281 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#15. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 10


Lowden, US
          

>>> “Note the small odd shaped "objects" in the images. They seem more defined in the D7100 image. Is the AA filter on the D600 blurring these?”

Would results from a D600 without the AA filter look identical to those from the D7100?”


That is an interesting question.

I would think the D7100, capturing a bit more detail, will take noise reduction a little better. With good post processing I would bet that a D7100 image could be made to match the IQ of the D600 at just about any print size.

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
jonmcguffin Registered since 16th Mar 2013Mon 18-Mar-13 02:41 AM
23 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#16. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 15


US
          

I'm so confused. Is it the poor lighting environment that caused the D7100 to produce such a poor image relative to the D600?

The further above examples of the flowers show both cameras at ISO 6400 looking MUCH closer than the girl on horse images.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
PaintedRays Silver Member Nikonian since 25th Oct 2011Mon 18-Mar-13 02:47 AM
81 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#17. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 10


Oregon, US
          

Also remember that there is a DOF difference with the 2 different sized sensors. The D600 has shallower DOF being much closer to the focus point.

www.paintedrays.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberMon 18-Mar-13 01:56 AM
3136 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#12. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 8


Monterey Bay, US
          

Try this comparison under the worst possible light at ISO 5600
tell which is which D7100 or D600?







Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
jonmcguffin Registered since 16th Mar 2013Mon 18-Mar-13 01:59 AM
23 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#13. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 12
Mon 18-Mar-13 02:01 AM by jonmcguffin

US
          

Well, I'm guessing without question the top one is the D600 and bottom (worse) is the D7100.

That's about the difference I would have expected to see. Frankly, maybe it's a little closer than I originally expected.

Out of curiosity, what aperture/shutter speed/focal length are you using in this? Same for both? The blacks in the bottom image look pretty bad on the jacket. Something I would have expected to see at ISO 12800+

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberMon 18-Mar-13 02:34 AM
3136 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#14. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 13
Mon 18-Mar-13 07:23 AM by RRRoger

Monterey Bay, US
          

>Well, I'm guessing without question the top one is the D600
>and bottom (worse) is the D7100.
>
>That's about the difference I would have expected to see.
>Frankly, maybe it's a little closer than I originally
>expected.
>
>Out of curiosity, what aperture/shutter speed/focal length are
>you using in this? Same for both? The blacks in the bottom
>image look pretty bad on the jacket. Something I would have
>expected to see at ISO 12800+

Correct. The top D600 image was at 75mm the other at 185mm They were all shot at f/2.8 and 500s except the D800 at 640s.
The images would be much better under normal lighting or if I used flash.
Those Sodium or Mercury Vapor lights + the bright background is a tourturous test.

Here is third one from a D800 for comparison ISO 5000 at 70mm o.o EV Auto WB, standard neutral





and a 4th under same lighting with D7000 with same f/2.8 lens 200s at 135mm,ISO5600,and Auto WB




Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
billD80 Silver Member Nikonian since 22nd Jan 2007Mon 18-Mar-13 10:42 AM
2141 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#20. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 14


US
          

Neat A/B/C comparison. Thanks for posting these.

I'd be hard pressed to really see differences if these weren't set side by side by side...

I think the ability for the D7100 to jump to 24mps and have ISO results like this is very impressive. It seems like ISO 6400 is very useable, yes?

www.billkeane.zenfolio.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
ardoluc Registered since 16th Feb 2013Sun 24-Mar-13 07:56 PM
20 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#29. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 12


saint-jean-sur-richelieu, CA
          

The first pic was with a D600 having a better lens than the second pic. The second shot has a lot of color fringing (blueish) on the the side of the hat (right).

Theses remarks were made using a PC and the key combinations "Ctrl" plus "+" to get the pics up to 400%"
Have a good day

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
kuzzy Silver Member Nikonian since 12th Dec 2005Mon 18-Mar-13 12:18 AM
1250 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#9. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 7


Milford, US
          

Pretty impressive indeed. The 600 is better but not by much. Both are quite impressive.

Marc
There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.-Ansel Adams

http://500px.com/WhatISaw
http://kuzzy.smugmug.com

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

VR8 Silver Member Nikonian since 04th May 2008Mon 18-Mar-13 01:42 PM
774 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#21. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 0


Ottawa, CA
          


Just watched a Scott Kelby movie from his blog comparing the d7100 to a D4 and using the D7100 with the new 80-400.

Side by side shots are always better when exactly the same subject in exactly the same position is used. The horse and child shots are great but as they are not identical its hard to see a real difference.

Victor

My website: www.rakmilphotography.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JPJ Silver Member Nikonian since 20th Aug 2009Mon 18-Mar-13 02:17 PM
1327 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#22. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 21


Toronto, CA
          

Watched the video and as far as I can tell (because without downloading the RAW files and viewing them full screen it can be touch) I agree,with Kelby's assessment not as good as the D4 - but not that far off.

Of course the D4 from what I have seen is not quite as good as the D600 which is very close to the D800, but I prefer the D800's high ISO appearance, especially if you down sample it to 24 MPs it is better than the D600 imo.

I think what has happened is that Nikon has moved the low ISO bar. 6400, which used to be (short of the D3s) where most FX shooters would stop is now probably 12800, maybe even higher. It looks like one could get usable shots out of the D7100 @ 6400 - but I would like to see more shots taken in poor lighting. If that is true it would represent yet another dagger by Nikon in the low light market where they were already better than the competition.

The 80-400 looks amazing by and by.

Jason

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
jonmcguffin Registered since 16th Mar 2013Mon 18-Mar-13 02:58 PM
23 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#23. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 22


US
          

I too watched the video and I'm sold and stoked. I pre-ordered the D7100 about 5-7 mins after it was announced, it's due here from B&H tomorrow. I took it on faith it would be an improvement, across the board, of the D7000.

Was definitely disappointed in the weaker buffer which was one of the main things I wanted to see them improve; it got worse. Next up was ISO performance, I never really feel too comfortable shooing my D7000 at anything above 800. 1600 can work, but I have a kind of mental block above 800. With the increase in MP count, I was just hoping that sensor technology would at least yield similar results and that too wouldn't be a step back but low and behold, it would appear based on the data above, plus Kelby's remarks (I am a big fan of him), that this camera in fact will have superior ISO performance and I may now feel as though I can shoot 3200 with much fear.

I'm SO pleased I put this camera on order. It sounds like it's going to be a fantastic compliment to my D700 and I should be set for camera bodies now until the next generation bodies all roll out. Sweet!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
torwood Silver Member Nikonian since 06th Dec 2010Tue 19-Mar-13 01:57 AM
664 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#24. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 23
Tue 19-Mar-13 06:33 PM by torwood

Jefferson Hills, US
          

I'm pretty much blown away by what I've read and heard so far. I see no distinguishable difference in the flower images - at least in the full photo. Maybe there is a teeny tiny bit of detail loss in the D7100 image, if you are specifically looking for it, but you'd never notice it otherwise. The horse images are the worst possible photographic situation I can imagine, and I think the distance to the back-light is different, so I'm pretty much not judging anything by those.

We'll have to wait for the aggregate of a bunch of tests to be sure, but at first glance, it appears that Nikon has broken another barrier in high ISO DX photography - which is what I expected them to do with a totally new 24MP DX sensor.

I can shoot my D7000 indoors for basketball up to about ISO 4000, and get serviceable images. At 3200 and below, they are more than acceptable for cropping and printing. If what I am seeing is accurate, ISO 6400 is the new ISO 4000 for DX, and that is about all the ISO I could even need. That said, show me some shots at ISO 6400 from a night football game, just to be sure.

Also, everyone I've read seems to think the AF is "blazing" fast, by D7000 standards. That's all good too. I still miss too many shots on my D7000 due to back-focus because the camera and lens can't lock-on and track subjects coming toward the camera fast enough in low light. Can't wait to get one of these for basketball next fall.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberTue 19-Mar-13 02:54 AM
3136 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#25. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 24


Monterey Bay, US
          

I am going to try my SB800 flash unit at the next Horse Show in that Arena.
Hopefully it will be powerfull enough to override the lousy lighting.
Last time I used it was for portraits and Automatic TTL settings worked well.
That is what I will try first at the shots will range from 20 to 120 feet.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
torwood Silver Member Nikonian since 06th Dec 2010Tue 19-Mar-13 06:40 PM
664 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#26. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 25


Jefferson Hills, US
          

I have to say, Roger, that back-lighting is one of the most challenging "sports" backgrounds I have ever seen. It looks like it's on all sides of the pavillion or arena. I would think that flash is a must, but I'd guess that could be an issue with the horses?

I have this issue in one of the gyms I shoot basketball in. There are large expanses of clerestory windows up above on one side. There is no way to properly expose for DR required, and the loss of contrast is horrible. I have just given up. When I have to shoot in that gym, I just make sure I shoot from the side of the court so that the light is at my back.

But, you might not have that option with this venue.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberTue 19-Mar-13 09:04 PM
3136 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#27. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 26


Monterey Bay, US
          

The back lighting is not as bad as the overhead Mercury/Sodium lights.
The horses do not even blink when a flash goes off.
It is the Trainers and Mom's I am afraid of,
as they are always looking for someone to blame their poor performance on.

I accidently shot my first photo with the wimp on camera flash before disabling it.
In retrospec it turned out realitively good, especially at only 125s.



Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Attachment #1, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Pugzilla Gold Member Nikonian since 05th Aug 2008Fri 22-Mar-13 03:06 AM
207 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#28. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 27


Boca Raton, US
          

Hi, all,

Don't have much info yet, but my early trials (D600 v. D7100) at ISO 3200 result in pretty much identical findings as those reported earlier: that the noise on the D7100 images is slightly coarser, but otherwise there is not a whole lot of difference. Some detail variations are noted, but I can't yet be certain of the possibly greater residual sharpness of the D7100. My trial was extremely cursory, and I need to set up a decent experimental model.

Walter

Never criticize a man until you walk a mile in his shoes. Then you'll be a mile away and have his shoes!

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
KnightPhoto Gold Member Nikonian since 18th Dec 2006Mon 25-Mar-13 03:55 AM
4184 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#30. "RE: D7100 vs D600 - high ISO"
In response to Reply # 28


Alberta, CA
          

>Hi, all,
>
>Don't have much info yet, but my early trials (D600 v. D7100)
>at ISO 3200 result in pretty much identical findings as those
>reported earlier: that the noise on the D7100 images is
>slightly coarser, but otherwise there is not a whole lot of
>difference. Some detail variations are noted, but I can't yet
>be certain of the possibly greater residual sharpness of the
>D7100. My trial was extremely cursory, and I need to set up a
>decent experimental model.
>
>Walter
>

Pretty remarkable performance on the DX sensor. Ol mother ship done good it looks like! Couple more lenses to fill out the line and there will be very little to criticize from top to bottom of the line (aside from QC and some of the lens pricing maybe ).

Best regards, SteveK

'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
My Nikonians gallery
My Nikonians Blog

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D7100, D7000 (Public) topic #25274 Previous topic | Next topic


Take the Nikonians Tour and learn more about being a Nikonian Wiki /FAQ /Help Listen to our MP3 photography radio channels Find anything on Nikon and imaging technology - fast!

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2014
All Rights Reserved

Nikonians®, NikoScope® and NikoniansAcademy™ are trademarks owned by Nikonians.org.
Nikon®, Nikonos® and Nikkor® are registered trademarks of Nikon Corporation.