"Buy D7000 now or wait until the bugs are worked out?"
Cape Coral, Florida, US
I like the specs of the new D7000! While I didn't feel the need to upgrade from my D200 to a D300s, I am considering getting a D7000. Based on Nikon's past experiences with just about every DSLR they introduced, the first models usually have some glitch that requires an immediate firmware update. Will some of you be buying the D7000 as soon as it hits the stores, or will you wait until after it has been around for a few months?
#1. "RE: Buy D7000 now or wait until the bugs are worked out?" In response to Reply # 0
>Based on Nikon's past experiences with just >about every DSLR they introduced, the first models usually >have some glitch that requires an immediate firmware update.
Really? I can't speak for other models but the D90 came out coming up to two years ago and has not required one fix. I wouldn't hesitate to buy early copies of a new model from Nikon, at least not with the great experience I've had.
Even if a firmware update was necessary, they aren't hard to do (as far as I've heard).
#3. "RE: Buy D7000 now or wait until the bugs are worked out?" In response to Reply # 2
St Petersburg, RU
The chance of just dropping by a store and buying one from stock won't be there for many months so it is not much of a worry. Just like the D3s, pre-orders and waiting lists meant few units were available over the counter. Those early adopters will find any bugs well before more cautious types every see one in the flesh. A million will be sold in the first 6 months....probably. The D90 was just another model that turned out to be much more capable than expected. This new one had high expectations and buzz yet seemed to even surpass the wildest speculations.
I checked the Canon forums and D300 forums and all are creating lists of reasons why the D7000 is not as good as their favorite, mostly based on faulty logic and jumping to negative conclusions, as if they need to defend the honor or their own model from the usurper which might overshadow their toy, as if the D7k suddenly made their camera less capable or something. So far, on the D300 forums, the consensus is that the D7k is not a pro model because it is clearly unacceptable to "pros" who can't possibly shoot with something lighter than a D300 and that the new model is missing 1 button and 1 switch from what they are used to. The Canon people are claiming it will be unusable because it does not shoot at 1080/30fps, and just a beginner camera since it has scenes buried in its menu. The light weight nature of the logic and conclusions all point a lot of people are very concerned that their gear is suddenly obsolete and the line between amateur and pro has faded to almost invisibility. With so many people seeking it and so many people trying to find fault, real or imagined, any software faults will be well known in by the time pre-orders ship. The D90 was almost unique in a complex consumer product that had no software issues. The chances of D7000's not having any are low but if anyone has shown they are capable of a superbly polished-when-released engineering effort it is Nikon. Stan St Petersburg Russia