Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D5300/D5200/D5100/D5000/D3300/D3200/D3100/D3000 (Public) topic #4272
View in linear mode

Subject: "5100 vs 3100" Previous topic | Next topic
crazywaldo Registered since 22nd Aug 2011Fri 26-Aug-11 01:49 PM
5 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
"5100 vs 3100"


US
          

Hello,

I am in the market for a camera to take pictures of the family. I will be doing the normal group photos (inside and outside), school recitals, sporting events both outside and inside(i.e.soccer, baseball, gymnastics, dance rectials, etc). I was wondering what camera and lenses do you guys recommend? Any help would be appreciated!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
RRRoger Silver Member
26th Aug 2011
1
Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
crazywaldo
28th Aug 2011
2
     Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
RRRoger Silver Member
28th Aug 2011
3
          Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
crazywaldo
29th Aug 2011
4
               Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100 vs D90
RRRoger Silver Member
29th Aug 2011
5
               Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
jpFoto
29th Aug 2011
6
                    Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
Erika Jordaan
29th Aug 2011
7
                         Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
jodylud
17th Sep 2011
9
                              Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
RRRoger Silver Member
17th Sep 2011
10
                              Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
crazywaldo
17th Sep 2011
11
                                   Reply message RE: 5100 vs 3100
RRRoger Silver Member
17th Sep 2011
12

RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberFri 26-Aug-11 02:26 PM
3170 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#1. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 0


Monterey Bay, US
          

The D3100 is a better "Point & Shoot" camera, but
I found it too small and too light to hold steady.

The D5100 will give you superior images and Video, but
you will need a MonoPod, TriPod, or good hand holding technique.
Because the extra pixels reveal user error much more better.
The D5100 is also more difficult to setup.

I would go down to the camera store and have them line up the D3100, D5100, and D7000 for you to get "Hands On".
I would also bring a SDHC card so I could compare pictures at home.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
crazywaldo Registered since 22nd Aug 2011Sun 28-Aug-11 06:13 PM
5 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#2. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 1


US
          

Thanks! I will go check them out at the camera store. Any lens recomendations?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberSun 28-Aug-11 07:42 PM
3170 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#3. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 2


Monterey Bay, US
          

Nikkor DX kit lens are actually quite good.
I prefer the 10-24, 28-300, and 35f/1.8 but find myself using the 18-55 more than I thought I would.
At any rate, you will need AF-S lens because the D3100 and D5100 have no focus motor.
You might check the EXIF on pictures you have taken to see what focal lengths you use most.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
crazywaldo Registered since 22nd Aug 2011Mon 29-Aug-11 01:52 AM
5 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#4. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 3


US
          

I was reading some reviews about the 5100 and people are saying to buy the d90 over the 5100. Any thoughts?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberMon 29-Aug-11 02:37 AM
3170 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#5. "RE: 5100 vs 3100 vs D90"
In response to Reply # 4


Monterey Bay, US
          

The D90 is easier to learn and use.
The D90 12mp Sensor is more forgiving.
The D90 has a focus motor.

The D5100 has a lot more capability.
This articulating LCD is very sturdy and nice to use.
The D5100 16mp Sensor can produce better images, but shows user errors mo beta too.
The D5100 can use all the newer Nikkors that have AF-S or you can manually focus the older ones like the 80-400.

I prefer the D5100 over other cameras for trips, hikes, and Video.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
jpFoto Registered since 25th Jun 2010Mon 29-Aug-11 08:16 AM
1114 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#6. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 4


US
          

The D90 is a discontinued camera body. It is older technology and while still a good camera, if you can stretch your budget, the D7000 would be a much better choice. It has a state of the art sensor, two card slots, better video (if that's important to you) and a host of other improvement that you can read about in the various reviews. It too has the autofocus motor so that you can use non-Af-S lenses.

jP

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Erika Jordaan Registered since 19th Dec 2009Mon 29-Aug-11 11:48 AM
140 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#7. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 6


Montagu, ZA
          

I ventured into the world of DSLR's 2 years ago with the D5000, 18-55mm lens and 70-300mm lens. With hindsight, I would have chosen the same combination if had the opportunity. I started doing more or less what you plan to do, but the photography bug has bitten me, and apart from a macro lens that I added, I find that this combination worked well for novice and still has lots to offer now that I am learning more and more and growing in experience every day.

Enjoy making the decision and enjoy getting to know your camera!

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
jodylud Registered since 07th Sep 2011Sat 17-Sep-11 11:21 AM
87 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#9. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 7
Sat 17-Sep-11 11:23 AM by jodylud

US
          

I would go with the D7000 as well.

The built-in Command flash mode is a real benefit. The D5100 doesn't have this feature and is a huge disappointment when you need to use your SBxxx flash off-camera for that special and subtle effect.

A Nikon battery grip is also available for the D7000 and not the D5100 (doesn't look like it's going to be either). Very convenient to be able to use AA batteries when you are out camping without electricity.

The D7000 body with both the 18-200mm f/3.5 and 35mm f/1.8 (for indoor) lenses and you're good to go.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberSat 17-Sep-11 01:56 PM
3170 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#10. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 9
Sat 17-Sep-11 02:01 PM by RRRoger

Monterey Bay, US
          

The D5100 is still my choice for Travel, Hikes, and Video.

I do not need a battery grip for this nor the extra weight.
The flash has only been used a couple times until I learned how to keep it from popping up on it's own.

We will continue to use our D7000 bodies for Event Photography,
due to the dual card slots, locking multiselector, and bigger battery.

I picked up my D7000 yesterday to take pictures in my Nursery because it had the lens I wanted to use on it.
Afterwards, I compared to the D5100 images I took a week earlier.
Because of the light weight handling advantage with the MonoPod, I liked the D5100 better for that too.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
crazywaldo Registered since 22nd Aug 2011Sat 17-Sep-11 02:22 PM
5 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#11. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 9


US
          

As I have NO expierence with DSLRs do you think the D7000 is the way to go? Do you think it might be too much camera for me? Its also twice the price of the D5100

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
RRRoger Silver Member Fellow Ribbon awarded for his long history of demonstrated excellence and helping other members with equipment, technique and DSLR video in the true Nikonians spirit. Charter MemberSat 17-Sep-11 02:48 PM
3170 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#12. "RE: 5100 vs 3100"
In response to Reply # 11


Monterey Bay, US
          

>As I have NO experience with DSLRs do you think the D7000 is
>the way to go? Do you think it might be too much camera for
>me? Its also twice the price of the D5100

Actually only 50% more money and worth it if you need the extra features and
don't need HD1080 at 30fps or an articulating LCD monitor.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D5300/D5200/D5100/D5000/D3300/D3200/D3100/D3000 (Public) topic #4272 Previous topic | Next topic


Take the Nikonians Tour and learn more about being a Nikonian Wiki /FAQ /Help Listen to our MP3 photography radio channels Find anything on Nikon and imaging technology - fast!

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2014
All Rights Reserved

Nikonians®, NikoScope® and NikoniansAcademy™ are trademarks owned by Nikonians.org.
Nikon®, Nikonos® and Nikkor® are registered trademarks of Nikon Corporation.