
US
|
Hi Tom,
Welcome to Nikonians!
>Hello all. I am a long time point and shoot camera user. I >have owned 3 digital point n shoot cameras (one kodak and two >sony) over the last ten years, and have taken at least 10K >pictures. I know the BASICS of photography, and know how to >get the most of my point and shoot.
Remember that P & S cameras and DSLR's have little in common. For one thing, P & S's have much more DOF (Depth of Field) for any given aperture than DSLR's.
>I have been saving my pennys and waited until the D3100 was >released. I build ukuleles and need to take semi-professional >pictures of them for my web site. > >I've had the camera about a month, and have taken about 200 >pictures with it so far with limited success. MOST pictures >are not very sharp(a bit blurry). It's as if the camera is >not focusing correctly? I have uploaded a few pictures to my >gallery so you can see what I'm talking about. I have the >camera set to auto focus in these pictures. In the people >pictures I have it set to aperture priority, metering mode, >center weighted, and in the ukulele picturess, I have it set >to fully automatic, metering mode, center weighted. > >I also uploaded a picture (Maple and redwood ukulele) taken >with my Sony DSC W350 pns camera, and you can see how sharp >the focus is. > >Is is possible I'm doing something incorrectly?
The Yellow Ukulel image (A) was captured at: 26mm, 1/40th sec., f/5, @ ISO 400. The top od the instrument looks over exposed. This is a result of using Auto exposure mode and Center Weighted metering combined with the dark background. By comparison the Ebony Ukulele image (B)captured at: 18mm, 1/125th sec., f/4, @ ISO 160 is exposed much better and is sharper to boot. Comparing the shooting data the thing that stands out is the 1/40th sec. exposure for image A. The slow shutter speed is the likely cause of the lack of sharpness. More so when considering image B was captured at f/4 though the wider FOV (Field of View) could account for some of the additional DOF. Were you using a tripod? If yes, is it a stable good quality tripod and head?
>I don't >really see what I could be doing wrong. Is it possible there >is something wrong with this camera from the factory?
It does not appear to be a camera problem as the images you refer to beleow are sharp.
>Please note, there are TWO pictures here (Larissa, and Larissa >and Leah) that look fantastic. And these were taken with OUT >a tripod. I am not sure why those two are nice and sharp, but >the majority of pictures I've taken are a little blurry.
Checking the Exif data of Larissa image (C) 85mm, 1/800th sec., f/4.5, @ ISO 400 and Leah & Larissa image (D) 125mm, 1/250th sec., f/4.8, @ ISO 100 confirms that a slow shutter speed seems to be at the root of your problem.
>Thanks for any advice you can give me. I'm not trying to be a >"professional" photographer. I was under the >impression I could get a better picture with this D3100 than >with my PNS, but these pictures are not sharp.
Getting used to a DSLR takes practice. It looks like you are using "hot lights" to capture the images of the Ukulele's. I would shoot in Manual exposure mode to get consistant exposures. Since image B was captured at 125th sec., f/4 @ ISO 160 that should be the place to start. Increasing the aperture to f/5.6 will provide a little more DOF so increase the ISO to ISO 340 or so to maintain the shutter speed. You could also add more light (double) and shoot at f/8 or so which will provide even more DOF. Good Luck and Enjoy your Nikons! Best Regards, Marty
|