nikonians

Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

| |
Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby MASTER YOUR TOOLS - Hardware & Software Digital postprocessing & workflow (Public) HDR software & hardware (Public) topic #5338
View in linear mode

Subject: "HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison" Previous topic | Next topic
augustf Gold Member Nikonian since 04th Nov 2007Sun 14-Nov-10 12:30 AM
1450 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
"HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
Sun 14-Nov-10 12:34 AM by augustf

Aldie, US
          

I finally got out to capture images to process in Nik HDR Efex Pro which I haven't had the opportunity to use yet. These were taken at Lorton Reformatory (Prison) south of Washington DC. The prison was closed in the early 2000's after a colorful past, and Congress legislated that the land could be used for the good of the community, so it was transformed into an artist's colony. The barracks now house studios for working artists - like the Torpedo Factory in Alexandria. Anyway, they wouldn't allow me to take pictures in the studios, but I was free to roam the grounds.

I went there around noon looking for scenes with wide tonal range. This is the first one I processed in both programs. The first was processed in Photomatix, and the second in HDR Efex Pro. To my mind, and eye, the results are comparable aside from the cooler hue in the Photomatix rendition which can be corrected (or not). So for me, the differences involve working with the program and what's involved in getting from here to there.

When you open an image in HDR Efex Pro, you are presented with about 33 presets with thumbnails on the left of the UI. These are visual indicators of what the image will look like if you click on that preset. You can just click through all 33 to find the one that give you the starting point closest to where you want to start, kinda like camera calibration in Lightroom and Camera Raw. There are even two presets for single image processing. I find these extremely valuable as you don't have to adjust individual sliders and guess where your image will end up as you do with Photomatix. You can even filter these preset to see your image in different modes like realistic, landscape, artistic, etc. I used one of the realistic presets for my HDR Efex image. For my adjustments in Photomatix I defaulted to Don Menges's recipe.

The global adjustment sliders are on the right of the UI and begin at the top with a tone compression slider which will globally scale back the highlights and open shadows. Below those are individual adjusment sliders; exposure, contrast, saturation, stucture, blacks, whites and warmth, all self explanatory. It's important to note that when you click on a present, all of these sliders are adjusted accordingly, so you can see how the sliders are set for the preset you chose, and you can move the sliders to make further adjustments as needed.

Next is an HDR Method drop down menu that allows you to pick what I can only describe as a finishing look such as crisp or clean or illuminate. I chose crisp for this image.

Below that is the real power of Nik software - the control points for selective adjustments. You just can't argue with the ability to add control points to selectively adjust a specific area. Those who have used other Nik apps or Capture NX know what I'm talking about.

Finally you have preset vignettes and preset levels and curves adjustment. I used neither on this image. When you're finished you click save and the image shows up in Lightroom just like Photomatix.

Bottom line for me: With all the controls and visual cues present in HDR Efex, I'm leaning in that direction, strongly. The UI is very intuitive, simple and laid out very well. There are lots of tutorial videos on the Nik Software site, although the site is not the easiest for finding what you are looking for. I just felt a lot surer about where I was going with this image as I progressed through the processing.

I'm not trying to sell anyone. This is only my impression of the app based on one image, but I do like the process. As I stated in the beginning, I think essentially, the results are comparable, but the process is different enough and easier enough to make me prefer it for now. I want to do some interiors, and capture some images at different times of the day to really exploit the program. No, I have not tried Oloneo as I believe it's still only available for PC's, not Macs.

D3
14-24mm
ISO 200
5 images
Sharpened in Nik Sharpener

Hope it helps.....

-August









De l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace!

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
esantos Moderator Nikonians Resources Writer. Recognized for his outstanding reviews on printers and printing articles. Awarded for his high level of expertise in various areas, including Landscape Photography Awarded for his extraordinary accomplishments in Landscape Photography. His work has been exhibited at the Smithsonian.
14th Nov 2010
1
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
vchelf Silver Member
14th Nov 2010
2
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit
14th Nov 2010
3
     Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
augustf Gold Member
14th Nov 2010
5
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
augustf Gold Member
14th Nov 2010
4
     Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
massulo Gold Member Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014
25th Nov 2010
9
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
augustf Gold Member
15th Nov 2010
6
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
dohearne Silver Member
16th Nov 2010
7
     Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
drFrank Silver Member
17th Nov 2010
8
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
KnightPhoto Gold Member
18th Oct 2012
10
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
drFrank Silver Member
18th Oct 2012
11
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
drFrank Silver Member
18th Oct 2012
12
     Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
KnightPhoto Gold Member
19th Oct 2012
15
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit
18th Oct 2012
13
     Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
KnightPhoto Gold Member
19th Oct 2012
14
          Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
drFrank Silver Member
19th Oct 2012
16
          Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit
19th Oct 2012
17
               Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
drFrank Silver Member
19th Oct 2012
18
                    Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Wingman Silver Member Awarded for sharing his excellent work and continued contribution to the forums, most notably at the Aviation forum. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014
20th Oct 2012
19
                         Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit
20th Oct 2012
20
                              Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Wingman Silver Member Awarded for sharing his excellent work and continued contribution to the forums, most notably at the Aviation forum. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014
20th Oct 2012
21
                                   Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit
22nd Oct 2012
22
                                   Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Wingman Silver Member Awarded for sharing his excellent work and continued contribution to the forums, most notably at the Aviation forum. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014
22nd Oct 2012
23
                                   Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit
25th Oct 2012
25
                                   Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
mfphoto1
22nd Oct 2012
24
                                   Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
cchoc Moderator Awarded for his in-depth knowledge and high level skills in various areas, most notably in Landscape Photography
27th Oct 2012
26
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
makiru Silver Member
03rd Nov 2012
27
Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
KnightPhoto Gold Member
03rd Nov 2012
28
     Reply message RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit
04th Nov 2012
29

esantos Moderator Nikonians Resources Writer. Recognized for his outstanding reviews on printers and printing articles. Awarded for his high level of expertise in various areas, including Landscape Photography Awarded for his extraordinary accomplishments in Landscape Photography. His work has been exhibited at the Smithsonian. Nikonian since 10th Nov 2002Sun 14-Nov-10 01:50 AM
11890 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#1. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 0


McAllen, US
          

Interesting report August, thank you. I just downloaded the trial version of HDR Efex and was impressed. I did find a glitch though. I tried processing a series of 9 exposures and the program refused to do it. I then trimmed it down to four exposures (the same series) and it did process this batch. Have you had a similar problem?

Otherwise, I like the program but for the money it seems a little steep. I'm still using Photomatix 4.0 and am anxiously waiting for Oloneo PhotoEngine to go to full release and see what that program is going to cost. I have been using PhotoEngine quite a bit lately and it is great in MHO and the fastest of the three in my limited testing.

Ernesto Santos
esartprints.com Ernesto Santos Photography

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
vchelf Silver Member Nikonian since 14th Sep 2009Sun 14-Nov-10 05:23 PM
284 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#2. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 1


Houston, US
          

I have not had issues processing 9 exposure HDRs. I've tested the program on several.

Best regards,

Victor Chelf (vchelf)
Houston, TX

Visit my Nikonians gallery

Visit my SmugMug gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit Nikonian since 02nd Aug 2006Sun 14-Nov-10 09:35 PM
4712 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#3. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 2
Sun 14-Nov-10 09:52 PM by Cavy2

Newtown, US
          

Thanks August for explaining the process.
I've had the same problem as Ernesto with 7 images.
As for results, found Photomatix worked better on some, and Efex better on others. Efex gave me some weird skies where Photomatix didn't, and as Ernesto said, the price is steep. Also found Efex to be very slow. I think Efex shines when processing one file. I'll play through the trial period. I'm more adept at Photomatix, as I've used it for quite some time.

http://kathycavallaro.smugmug.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
augustf Gold Member Nikonian since 04th Nov 2007Sun 14-Nov-10 11:44 PM
1450 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#5. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 3


Aldie, US
          

Hi Kathy,

Thanks for replying. Just trying to be helpful and let people who have been wondering about HDR Efex Pro what they what they will be dealing with.

You know, I think that each program will yield results better with different images, and I haven't been able to identify why or what kind of images work best with what program. I noticed the same thing with Photomatix and CS4 HDR. HDR in CS5 is supposed to be greatly improved, so I'll have to try that one as well.

I didn't find it to be slower, and was also impressed with the job it did on single images. I was using five images for this trial. I mentioned in my reply to Ernesto, and I should have mentioned in the original post, that I was using Photomatix 3.x, so I'll have to download the 4.0 to evaluate as well. The voyage continues.........

-August

De l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
augustf Gold Member Nikonian since 04th Nov 2007Sun 14-Nov-10 11:32 PM
1450 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#4. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 1


Aldie, US
          

Hi Ernesto,

I used five images for my HDR processing this time. Part of the evaluation is going to have to include using more images as well as other sets of circumstances. I did use it on single images and was impressed with the results there as well. Also, I should have mentioned that I was using Photomatix 3.X. I'll have to download the 4.0 update and compare that too. I also need to compare with CS5's updated HDR process. Just looking for the process that I think yields the best results for me. The upside is that there are so many options available; the downside is that there are so many options available.

-August

De l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
massulo Gold Member Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Nikonian since 07th May 2002Thu 25-Nov-10 02:12 AM
10895 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#9. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 4


Tampa/Lutz, US
          

Photomatix 4 is much better and faster. I have the nik efex for both mac and pc. It runs great on the mac but not on the pc. It says that I don't have enough memory the 32 bit version has problems there working on a fix for it.
I work with all 3. Oloneo, photomatix and efex



Preston-(The Tampa Nikonian)..D610


-One does not know what one is missing - until you miss it..



My Website

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

augustf Gold Member Nikonian since 04th Nov 2007Mon 15-Nov-10 12:15 AM
1450 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#6. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 0


Aldie, US
          

One more image for comparison. I processed this one in CS5 HDR. The first and probably only difference I noted was that the colors in the brickwork were not as vibrant. I only added basic global adjustments in Lightroom and sharpened in Nik Sharpener, as I did with the others.

-August



De l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace!

Attachment #1, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
dohearne Silver Member Nikonian since 07th May 2007Tue 16-Nov-10 02:03 PM
815 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#7. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 6


Ludlow, US
          

I just downloaded the trial Efex copy yesterday. In looking at the one HDR I did in Efex and examining the examples here, I have the impression that Efex yields a sharper image than does Photomatix. Anyone else have this impression?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
drFrank Silver Member Nikonian since 16th Dec 2006Wed 17-Nov-10 09:08 PM
895 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#8. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 7


Beaver Falls, US
          

I like the output from HDR EfEx better than Photomatix.

drFrank
www.frankkendralla.com
www.kendrallaphotography.com
www.kendralla.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

KnightPhoto Gold Member Nikonian since 18th Dec 2006Thu 18-Oct-12 04:19 AM
4479 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#10. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 0


Alberta, CA
          

I see that this is an old thread, but if you don't mind how has everyone been getting along with their use of Photomatix vs. HDR EFEX?

This point here is probably justification alone for me acquiring HDR EFEX:
"Below that is the real power of Nik software - the control points for selective adjustments. You just can't argue with the ability to add control points to selectively adjust a specific area. Those who have used other Nik apps or Capture NX know what I'm talking about. "

I am a committed Capture NX2 guy, so I would only be using HDR EFEX in standalone mode (just like I do currently with Photomatix 4.2). BTW Photomatix 4.2 seems to have a number of good new features!

Best regards, SteveK

'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
My Nikonians gallery
My Nikonians Blog

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
drFrank Silver Member Nikonian since 16th Dec 2006Thu 18-Oct-12 10:15 AM
895 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#11. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 10


Beaver Falls, US
          

>I see that this is an old thread, but if you don't mind how
>has everyone been getting along with their use of Photomatix
>vs. HDR EFEX?
>
>This point here is probably justification alone for me
>acquiring HDR EFEX:
>"Below that is the real power of Nik software - the
>control points for selective adjustments. You just can't argue
>with the ability to add control points to selectively adjust a
>specific area. Those who have used other Nik apps or Capture
>NX know what I'm talking about. "
>
>I am a committed Capture NX2 guy, so I would only be using HDR
>EFEX in standalone mode (just like I do currently with
>Photomatix 4.2). BTW Photomatix 4.2 seems to have a number of
>good new features!
>
>Best regards, SteveK
>
>'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see
>without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
>My
>Nikonians gallery>
>
My Nikonians Blog

HDREfex is great


drFrank
www.frankkendralla.com
www.kendrallaphotography.com
www.kendralla.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
drFrank Silver Member Nikonian since 16th Dec 2006Thu 18-Oct-12 10:18 AM
895 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#12. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 11


Beaver Falls, US
          

HDREfex


drFrank
www.frankkendralla.com
www.kendrallaphotography.com
www.kendralla.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
KnightPhoto Gold Member Nikonian since 18th Dec 2006Fri 19-Oct-12 03:21 AM
4479 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#15. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 12


Alberta, CA
          

Very nice work Frank! Beautiful natural rendering, which is what I strive for.

Longer term it looks like I better pencil in getting HDR FX.

BTW let me know if you guys heard any rumblings about Photomatix 5.0 and what it may bring to the table?

I am a little torn about HDR in the first place but on the other hand I am not. My minds eye can see the light and rendering, that's why I take the darn photo in the first place! And HDR helps me to show what I see, not what the digital sensor renders in a single shot.

I'm guessing the people in this forum feel the same way about light and dynamic range as I do.

Best regards, SteveK

'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
My Nikonians gallery
My Nikonians Blog

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit Nikonian since 02nd Aug 2006Thu 18-Oct-12 01:50 PM
4712 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#13. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 10


Newtown, US
          

Hi Steve,
I like Nik's products and use them on a daily basis. I still use Photomatix as well. Last week I found this article that I found very interesting. Here's the link http://amateurlandscapephotography.blogspot.com/2012/09/hdr-efex-pro-2-vs-photomatix-pro-42.html

Hope you enjoy.

http://kathycavallaro.smugmug.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
KnightPhoto Gold Member Nikonian since 18th Dec 2006Fri 19-Oct-12 03:17 AM
4479 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#14. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 13


Alberta, CA
          

Thanks Kathy, that was a great article and the examples very helpful! I'm drawing some shorter-term conclusions:

- at minimum I'm not leagues behind with my current Photomatix, so that is a relief (I wasn't at all sure how the current comparisons were).

- I actually liked the Photomatix renderings in several cases where the author gave an edge to HDR EFEX. I've just been doing some Exposure Fusions and in many cases I ended up happiest with renderings with more blocked shadows, but each to their own. I also have a goal of doing some Low-Key dark-rendering photography, although very little experience on my part.

- I need to handle ghosting better. Gotta go back to the drawing board on a couple images - darn wind! I also need to work with 4.2 to try those new features as it appears there are some dramatically better capabilities in 4.2.

BTW love your Bucks County and Downtown Indianapolis Canal Off topic but let me know if you are aware of a method to run Topaz Simplify stand-alone (I am a Capture NX2 guy). I have always wanted that software too!

Best regards, SteveK

'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
My Nikonians gallery
My Nikonians Blog

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
drFrank Silver Member Nikonian since 16th Dec 2006Fri 19-Oct-12 09:47 AM
895 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#16. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 14


Beaver Falls, US
          

Thank you for the kind words -

I do not know much about Photomatix 5. I fell in love with HDR Efex's interface and never looked back. There are many nice 'updated' features in v2.

I run it from Lightroom and/or Photoshop. Often I do a variety of changes outside HDR Efex to get the look I like.

drFrank
www.frankkendralla.com
www.kendrallaphotography.com
www.kendralla.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit Nikonian since 02nd Aug 2006Fri 19-Oct-12 05:07 PM
4712 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#17. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 14


Newtown, US
          

Hi Steve,
I'm glad you enjoyed the article. I find myself using it as a reference. I too liked most of the results from the Photomatix renderings, and was glad to see Nik published the article. I have found Nik to be most responsive in all areas, hope that will continue now that they were purchased by Google.

I'm working with a shot from my driveway that has a huge dynamic range (shade on the drive and strong light on the fall trees). Getting some weird black artifacts where the DR is the strongest. I've tried many exposure combos, and haven't found one that's a complete success. Lots of moving leaves as well. This one has proven to be a real challenge!

I use NX2 a lot for my infrared processing, and mostly use CS5 for regular stuff. I always use my Topaz programs in CS5, so don't know if it will run alone. I have found them to be very responsive as well, I'd ask if they have it the works.

Do you have Color Efex Pro 4? I just upgraded from 3, and find I'm using these filters more than Topaz.

Thanks for your kind comments on my pics. Glad you enjoyed them!

http://kathycavallaro.smugmug.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
drFrank Silver Member Nikonian since 16th Dec 2006Fri 19-Oct-12 06:15 PM
895 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#18. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 17


Beaver Falls, US
          

I used to use Topaz always but rarely open it. I have the entire Nik suite (silver efex - too) and they fit my style.

This image is done entirely with Nik (HDR efex and color efex) and CS 6 tools.



drFrank
www.frankkendralla.com
www.kendrallaphotography.com
www.kendralla.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Wingman Silver Member Awarded for sharing his excellent work and continued contribution to the forums, most notably at the Aviation forum. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Nikonian since 02nd Dec 2002Sat 20-Oct-12 02:47 AM
1362 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#19. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 18


Kimberley, CA
          

Interesting thread -- I'm in the market for an HDR program. I do a lot of cabin interiors for a project I'm working for the National Park Service. I used CS5 all last winter with decent results, but it is so agonisingly slow and I find the controls somewhat limiting. I've been looking at Oloneo because of its reputation for processing speed, relative ease of use, and a reasonable learning curve. Can anyone comment on Photoengine versus the NIK product?

Neal Nurmi

---Wingman Photo---

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit Nikonian since 02nd Aug 2006Sat 20-Oct-12 01:49 PM
4712 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#20. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 19


Newtown, US
          

Hi Neal,
I've had Oloneo for about a year now, and use it frequently, but mostly on one file HDR renderings. My experience has been the blended file appears too sharp, and the controls are somewhat limited. When I process bracketed shots I use HDR Efex or Photomatix.


http://kathycavallaro.smugmug.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Wingman Silver Member Awarded for sharing his excellent work and continued contribution to the forums, most notably at the Aviation forum. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Nikonian since 02nd Dec 2002Sat 20-Oct-12 08:26 PM
1362 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#21. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 20
Sat 20-Oct-12 08:31 PM by Wingman

Kimberley, CA
          

Thanks Kathy. "Too sharp" is not a description I've seen in the reviews and tutorials I've seen on Photoengine. In fact I've seen some comments that the Photomatix renderings feel soft.

Has anyone else here found this?

What controls do the other packages have that are lacking in Oloneo?

Attached is the sort of thing I have been attempting to do, with very mixed results. This was 9 exposures, done in CS5. These cabin interiors are very dark, so the EV range is huge.

Neal Nurmi

---Wingman Photo---


Attachment #1, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit Nikonian since 02nd Aug 2006Mon 22-Oct-12 01:53 PM
4712 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#22. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 21


Newtown, US
          

HI Neil,
Here's two 4 shot files processed in both Oloneo and Photomatix. Both are before any pp is done in Photoshop (which they both need). Photomatix always needs some contrast added. This file group had a huge dynamic range. Oloneo's rendering looks more natural, but Photomatix has more of the color dynamics that I was looking for. Again, this is without the benefit of pp.


Oloneo


Photomatix



http://kathycavallaro.smugmug.com/

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
Wingman Silver Member Awarded for sharing his excellent work and continued contribution to the forums, most notably at the Aviation forum. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Nikonian since 02nd Dec 2002Mon 22-Oct-12 03:15 PM
1362 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#23. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 22


Kimberley, CA
          

An interesting and useful comparison, Kathy. Thank you.

I tend to like a very realistic rendering, and probably would have aimed for something in between, perhaps the first with some warmth added in Photoshop. I'm personally just a bit bothered by the intensity and saturation of the greens in the Photomatix version, but that is a matter of taste. Doesn't Oloneo have a means to adjust color balance during the process?

Could you estimate how long you spent in each software package to produce these renderings?

Thanks again for this.

Neal Nurmi

---Wingman Photo---

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit Nikonian since 02nd Aug 2006Thu 25-Oct-12 02:26 PM
4712 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#25. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 23


Newtown, US
          

Sorry for the late response Neal.
I didn't spend much time in either program with these. I like the new controls in Photomatix, but with both programs I make most of my final detail adjustments in CS5. I always bring them into Photoshop to fine tune anyway, so I'm personally more comfortable adjusting WB and such in CS5.

From my camera, I most always get a cool tone from Oloneo and magenta tones in Photomatix.


http://kathycavallaro.smugmug.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
mfphoto1 Registered since 29th Oct 2005Mon 22-Oct-12 04:48 PM
733 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#24. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 22


Cincinnati, US
          

Very interesting and informative thread.

After looking at these two versions I think they are a lot closer than most people think. They both have a color cast issue. That is where I would start once they are processed in photoshop.

The Oloneo image is slightly cool and needs to be warmed up a bit to eliminate the blue color cast. The Photomatix image has to much magenta, fixing that should still let the colors pop but bring it back to a more natural look.

"Step into my world and see as I see"

My Nikonians Gallery

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
cchoc Moderator Awarded for his in-depth knowledge and high level skills in various areas, most notably in Landscape Photography Charter MemberSat 27-Oct-12 10:18 PM
4647 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#26. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 21


Marietta, US
          

Contrary to popular 'best practices' on HDR processing, I have found that sharpening the individual images prior to input into the HDR programs (Photomatix and HDR Efex 2) gives me better results than sending in unsharpened images and sharpening after processing. (I use LR as my main editing program).

Charlie...
stalking light

Nikonians Team Member

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

makiru Silver Member Nikonian since 27th Feb 2008Sat 03-Nov-12 06:01 AM
95 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#27. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 0


Manila, PH
          

I like to do HDR panoramics and sometimes I have to process up to 420 photo's, made up of three rows of twenty (positions) and then seven pictures (+3, +2, +1, 0, -1, -2 and -3) for each position. Photmatix will allow you to batch process all the pictures, just put in the number of pictures, 3, 4, 5 etc. 'starting with...' usually the first picture in the batch. It then counts the number of pictures you have specified and then creates an HDR file (JPG, TIFF...) for each batch of pictures. I then put all the pictures in PTGui and then depending on the number of pictures, come back a bit later and its all stitched. I haven't been able to find this on HDREfex yet, but for single HDR's I think its personal choice between HDREfex and Photomatix. Funnily enough, the November issue of Digital Photo Magazine in the UK did a test of some popular HDR software and for them, HDR Efex Pro 2 came out on top. They particularly liked the auto-alignment feature and the creative presets. Photomatix Pro 4 came second (they also tested Oloneo HDRengine v1.1 and Elements 10 Photomerge). Of course, CS5 or 6 may probably be better than Elements 10. Like I said, for me the batch processing feature in Photomatix is quite important (until I find a way to do it in HDR Efex Pro...) and there's no reason you can't create your own presets...

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
KnightPhoto Gold Member Nikonian since 18th Dec 2006Sat 03-Nov-12 04:13 PM
4479 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#28. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 27


Alberta, CA
          

Just curious if you folk are actually finding +3 useful? I get so much flare I'm never sure if that frame is contributing helping information or actually making matters worse?

Best regards, SteveK

'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
My Nikonians gallery
My Nikonians Blog

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Cavy2 Silver Member Awarded for her continuing willingness to keep on learning and to share her knowledge with others in the Nikonians spirit Nikonian since 02nd Aug 2006Sun 04-Nov-12 01:05 PM
4712 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#29. "RE: HDREfex vs Photomatix - First Prelim Comparison"
In response to Reply # 28


Newtown, US
          

Hi Steve,
I wonder the same thing. My thought is if there's information that doesn't appear in the +2 than yes. I guess it's and image by image thing.
I'd be interested to get some other takes on this.


http://kathycavallaro.smugmug.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Forums Lobby MASTER YOUR TOOLS - Hardware & Software Digital postprocessing & workflow (Public) HDR software & hardware (Public) topic #5338 Previous topic | Next topic