Cropping scanned prints with faststone
I wonder if someone could help me out with this one?
I've been acanning in some smallish old prints (5 x 3 1/2")using my flatbed scanner.
What I get on my sixteen to nine monitor is a decent scan in the middle of the monitor and a black block left and right of the image.
This is exactly what I expected to get as the image is a different size ratio to my oughly 21 x 12 " monitor.
Of course, this is also what I get, but to a lessor extent with digital captures from my modern Nikons.
When I try and crop the scanned print images- instead of chopping off the top and bottom-leaving me with an enlarged image which completely fills the monitor,Faststone 4.6 just crops the top and bottom off, leaving me with the exact same image but with the top and bottom removed and the black areas left and right unaltered!
The weird thing is that in the 'crop board' the presentation for digital photos and these scanned prints is identical. The output though, is very different.
my webpage is at http://www.scottishops.co.uk
my Nikonians gallery is here. http://images.nikonians.org/galleries/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/330319
#1. "RE: Cropping scanned prints with faststone" | In response to Reply # 0elec164 Nikonian since 15th Jan 2009Wed 13-Feb-13 04:48 AM | edited Wed 13-Feb-13 01:40 PM by elec164
I've never used Faststone, and there is for me significant information missing. But I'll offer an educated guess.
Aspect Ratio is part of the problem, and lack of pixel dimension is most likely the other.
Part of the missing info is the resolution you scanned at, and the resolution of your monitor. For example my monitor has a aspect ratio of
16: 916:10 and a native resolution is 1920x1200. Generally I would scan a print at 300 PPI ( because that's about all the useful information you can get from a print). Scanning a 5x3.5 print at 300 PPI would result in a pixel dimension of 1500x1050. Monitors can only show a image at acutal pixel dimensions unless the program used for displaying them scales them on the fly. So it would fall short on all sides (little bit on top and bottom significantly more left and right side) for filling the screen. If I cropped the scan to a 16:10 aspect ratio without up-sampling, it would be shorter top to bottom with the sides either being the same or shorter depending on the crop.
If you want the scans to fill the screen, you need to scan with enough resolution to allow for cropping and still have the pixel dimensions to fill the screen. Or scan at whatever resolution, then crop and up-sample to needed dimensions.
Hope this helps.
Visit my Nikonians gallery.