
Ann Arbor, US
|
Here are my 2 cents on his site, having been a subscriber for a couple of years now.
His site does offer a wealth of information, and much of it is considerably more detailed than other reviews or sources. But you should also go in knowing what to expect. You also need to know his market. If you do not have a high end budget, a lot of the information on his site may not be the most useful for you. Often his comparisons are between gear like $5000-15000 Leica lenses, the $20,000 Leica S2 system, medium format bodies, the highest end DSLRs, etc. If buying a single Zeiss prime is a big purchase for you, it may be hard to relate to his experiences, since he seems to often talk about the performance of this top-end gear, and use it as his benchmark for comparison. His DAP does include reviews of more "common" gear like the Nikon 24-120/4, 28-300 zoom, f1.4G primes, etc. but remember that when you read them, he is used to shooting considerably higher end gear. Therefore, his conclusions often are "well it's pretty good but they're no Zeiss/Leica primes".
I read thoroughly his guide to Zeiss primes (but have not revisited in a number of months), and perused his DAP section. Starting last year I do have a subscription to making sharp images, but I have been very busy with other things and not had the time to go through it in detail. From what I have seen, however, it seems to focus more on the various reasons of why you can't or won't get sharp images from your gear, instead of specific methods to actually improve the sharpness of your photos.
I could basically summarize what you will learn about making sharp images from his MSI articles with the following: if you want maximum sharpness, shoot only Zeiss primes (or Leica if you have a Leica camera), use a high end tripod, and manual focus only using zoomed-in live view. Anything else will fall short of perfection. I was a little let down by this, as I thought MSI would include more knowledge on how to actually maximize sharpness with the gear you have, such as specific sharpening settings/techniques, or good camera handling practice/discipline, etc. Now I could be wrong as I said I have not gone through all of it in detail, but that seemed to be the gist of that section of his website.
This is not to say I don't find his site useful, or that it was worth the money. But at the same time, I don't think subscribing year after year like he would like is worth the money. Updates and additions are not plentiful or significant enough to really warrant continuing subscriptions, unless he is going to review some specific gear you are very interested in.
Norman Some of my pictures
|