Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D90/D80/D70 (Public) topic #5254
View in linear mode

Subject: "Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan" Previous topic | Next topic
ade Registered since 03rd Apr 2006Thu 02-Nov-06 10:24 PM
211 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
"Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"


CA
          

I quote his website: "My testing, my review, and my eBook are basically done. However, I'm concerned about something I found on my early D80. If you have a D80, please email me for a simple test that I'd like you to perform with your camera."

-Ade
-------------------
www.barkah.org

-Ade
www.barkah.org

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Replies to this topic
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
briantilley Moderator
03rd Nov 2006
1
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Holmes375 Silver Member
03rd Nov 2006
2
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
k5mitch
03rd Nov 2006
3
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
briantilley Moderator
03rd Nov 2006
4
               Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
klrbee25 Silver Member
03rd Nov 2006
5
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Itzed
20th Dec 2006
81
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
dm1dave Administrator
16th Jan 2008
                         Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
dm1dave Administrator
16th Jan 2008
121
                              Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Borut
03rd Nov 2006
18
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
sbird
03rd Nov 2006
6
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
scyfreestyler
03rd Nov 2006
7
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
klrbee25 Silver Member
03rd Nov 2006
8
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
scyfreestyler
03rd Nov 2006
9
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
klrbee25 Silver Member
03rd Nov 2006
10
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
thom
03rd Nov 2006
14
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
klrbee25 Silver Member
03rd Nov 2006
15
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
bclaff Silver Member
04th Nov 2006
23
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
redrider
04th Nov 2006
36
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
briantilley Moderator
04th Nov 2006
28
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Delta5
03rd Nov 2006
11
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Mort82
03rd Nov 2006
12
               Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
briantilley Moderator
03rd Nov 2006
13
               Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Steelie
19th Nov 2006
65
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
hwdx347
03rd Nov 2006
16
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
LD
03rd Nov 2006
17
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
dm1dave Administrator
03rd Nov 2006
19
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
ShawnC1032
03rd Nov 2006
20
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
F2AS Silver Member
03rd Nov 2006
21
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
f_aaberg
03rd Nov 2006
22
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
michael_tn
04th Nov 2006
24
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
dm1dave Administrator
04th Nov 2006
26
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
djhanson100
04th Nov 2006
25
               Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
ade
04th Nov 2006
27
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Kevox
04th Nov 2006
29
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
F2AS Silver Member
04th Nov 2006
30
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
oldvjp1
04th Nov 2006
31
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
thom
04th Nov 2006
33
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Holmes375 Silver Member
04th Nov 2006
35
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
BJNicholls Gold Member
06th Nov 2006
57
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
ShawnC1032
04th Nov 2006
32
                         Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
ade
05th Nov 2006
39
Reply message Yeah! Good to see that some else has this problem too..
mawess
04th Nov 2006
34
Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
GPSMapNut
05th Nov 2006
37
Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
Calabrais
05th Nov 2006
38
Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
briantilley Moderator
05th Nov 2006
40
Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
GPSMapNut
05th Nov 2006
41
     Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
briantilley Moderator
05th Nov 2006
42
          Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
klrbee25 Silver Member
05th Nov 2006
43
          Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
GPSMapNut
05th Nov 2006
48
               Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
briantilley Moderator
05th Nov 2006
53
Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
Artuk
05th Nov 2006
44
     Reply message Another set of results
cla
05th Nov 2006
45
     Reply message RE: Another set of results
ade
05th Nov 2006
46
     Reply message RE: Another set of results
F2AS Silver Member
05th Nov 2006
47
     Reply message RE: Another set of results
thom
05th Nov 2006
51
     Reply message RE: Another set of results
briantilley Moderator
05th Nov 2006
54
     Reply message RE: Another set of results
pjdonovan
22nd Jan 2007
106
     Reply message RE: Another set of results
mawess
05th Nov 2006
52
     Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
GPSMapNut
05th Nov 2006
49
          Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
Kevox
05th Nov 2006
50
               Reply message RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of...
GPSMapNut
05th Nov 2006
55
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
hmcstud
06th Nov 2006
56
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
yunfat
07th Nov 2006
58
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
GPSMapNut
07th Nov 2006
59
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
yunfat
08th Nov 2006
60
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
RichardBrandt
17th Nov 2006
61
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
ade
18th Nov 2006
62
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
thom
18th Nov 2006
63
Reply message Maybe it's not heat...
GPSMapNut
22nd Nov 2006
66
Reply message RE: Maybe it's not heat...
RichardBrandt
29th Nov 2006
68
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
RichardBrandt
29th Nov 2006
67
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
GPSMapNut
18th Nov 2006
64
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
RichardBrandt
29th Nov 2006
69
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
JDL_1
04th Dec 2006
70
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
James23p Moderator
09th Dec 2006
71
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
kocho
09th Dec 2006
72
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
James23p Moderator
09th Dec 2006
73
               Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
D dub
10th Dec 2006
74
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
GPSMapNut
11th Dec 2006
75
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
dm1dave Administrator
11th Dec 2006
76
                    Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
sj
15th Dec 2006
77
                         Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Ricky11
15th Dec 2006
78
                         Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
JDL_1
16th Dec 2006
79
                              Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
triumph1
18th Dec 2006
80
                                   Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
hbenas
20th Dec 2006
82
                                        Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
sahunt
03rd Jan 2007
83
                                             Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Orbit1
03rd Jan 2007
84
                                             Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
F2AS Silver Member
03rd Jan 2007
85
                                             Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
smattingly
04th Jan 2007
86
                                             Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
D dub
09th Jan 2007
91
                                             Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
sahunt
04th Jan 2007
87
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
smattingly
04th Jan 2007
88
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
kocho
04th Jan 2007
89
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
cliveg
04th Jan 2007
90
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
michaejlt
20th Jan 2007
92
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
kocho
20th Jan 2007
93
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
GPSMapNut
20th Jan 2007
94
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
D dub
20th Jan 2007
95
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
F2AS Silver Member
20th Jan 2007
96
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
michaejlt
20th Jan 2007
97
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
danamc Gold Member
20th Jan 2007
98
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
F2AS Silver Member
21st Jan 2007
99
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
GPSMapNut
21st Jan 2007
100
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
michaejlt
21st Jan 2007
101
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
andrewylan
22nd Jan 2007
107
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
GPSMapNut
21st Jan 2007
102
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
michaejlt
21st Jan 2007
104
                                                  Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
JDL_1
22nd Jan 2007
105
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
oddstray
21st Jan 2007
103
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Sharp30
23rd Jan 2007
108
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
jmans
26th Jan 2007
109
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
jmans
26th Jan 2007
110
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
JDL_1
26th Jan 2007
111
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
jmans
26th Jan 2007
112
               Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
helibebcnof Silver Member
26th Jan 2007
113
               Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
JDL_1
26th Jan 2007
114
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
emanuelme
27th Jan 2007
115
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
mathjak107
27th Jan 2007
116
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Rebelranger
28th Jan 2007
117
     Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
Rebelranger
05th Feb 2007
118
          Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
emanuelme
05th Feb 2007
119
Reply message RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan
mathjak107
05th Feb 2007
120

briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Fri 03-Nov-06 09:12 AM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#1. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


Paignton, GB
          

Intriguing...

Has anyone here taken Thom up on this?

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Holmes375 Silver Member Nikonian since 09th Sep 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 02:20 PM
1523 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#2. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 1


US
          

I emailed him but haven't heard back yet.

Holmes


-Holmes
http://holmes.zenfolio.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
k5mitch Registered since 29th Aug 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 02:27 PM
40 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#3. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 2


Portland, US
          

>I emailed him but haven't heard back yet.
>
>Holmes

Same here...

Nikon D200
Nikkor 16-85 VR
Sigma 10-20mm
Nikkor 70-300 VR
Nikkor 50mm 1.8
SB600

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Fri 03-Nov-06 02:29 PM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#4. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 3


Paignton, GB
          

Please keep us informed, guys

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
klrbee25 Silver Member Nikonian since 03rd Jun 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 03:49 PM
1384 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#5. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 4


Naples, US
          

Here is the reply I received from Thom:

The D80 has substantial amp noise (see amp15min.jpg; the purple blotches are amp noise), but there seems to be a high degree of sample variation. In particular, I’m concerned about the area indicated by the arrow in the above image. Here’s the test I need you to make:

1. Reset your D80 so that the camera defaults are in place.
2. Set ISO 1600.
3. Set Manual exposure mode.
4. Set JPEG Fine Large as the image quality.
5. White balance and other settings should be Auto (because of #1).
6. Put a lens cap on your lens or a body cap (no lens in place) on the camera.
7. Perform a series of exposures in the following sequence: 1/60, 1/30, 1/15, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1s, 2s, 4s, 8s.
8. Start Photoshop (or Photoshop Elements).
9. Open each exposure and visually examine with the exposure at Fit Screen viewing mode. If there is any purple at the top in the 1000-1600 pixel axis (horizontal) note that.
10. Now run Auto Levels on each exposure. You may not have seen purple before but you may see it now (see example, amp1.jpg). Again, note that particular area at the top between 1000 and 1600 on the horizontal axis.

What I need back from you is a table like the following:

D80 Serial Number (I won’t release this to anyone else)
Results at Fit Screen
Results at Auto Levels

Here’s an example:

#3001006
1/60 not visible, 1/30 not visible, 1/15 not visible, 1/8 not visible, 1/4 visible, 1/2 visible, 1s visible, 2s visible, 4s visible, 8s visible
1/60 visible, 1/30 visible, 1/15 visible, 1/8 visible, 1/4 visible, 1/2 visible, 1s visible, 2s visible, 4s visible, 8s visible

Thanks in advance for your help.

(Yes, I have been in contact with Nikon about what I suspect. As you might expect from what I’ve written before, they didn’t say anything to confirm or deny anything, thus my need to get more information from a representative sample of product.)

_____________________________________________________________
The anomaly he notes in the attached images appears as large purple "blooms" from the top of the image (imagine purple flare against an otherwise black image).

If someone with a full Nikonians membership would like to post the images, send me your email and I'll forward you his samples of the problem.

-Alex Rosen
www.flickr.com/photos/klrbee25/

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Itzed Basic MemberWed 20-Dec-06 01:28 PM
20 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#81. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 5


Bel Air, US
          

I've been shooting weddings and portraits with a D100 for 4 years and have never noticed a problem like is discussed here. I'm currently considering the D80 so I'm reading these forums. Just for hoots, I performed this test on my D100, with the exception that I didn't bother downloading the images to a computer or running PS auto levels, I just viewed them on the camera LCD monitor to see if I could see anything. Results: There's a hot spot in the upper left hand corner that first becomes apparent at 1/8 second, and gradually grows bigger until it's pretty darn big at 30 seconds. No other spots I could see. So obviously, if this is apparent on the LCD then it's probably much more apparent on a computer and then even more so after running auto levels. I would guess you might begin to see traces of it even at 1/16 or even 1/30. So my conclusion is that if I've never noticed this after 4 years, thousands of images, post processing, and sales of prints, then it's obviously not an issue for the type of shooting I do, so I'm not going to worry about it. I'll probably pick up a D80 over the weekend and be done with it.

Ed
http://lightandsilver.com

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Wed 16-Jan-08 01:11 PM
11602 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
"RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"


Lowden, US
          

Here are the sample files Thom sent out

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Wed 16-Jan-08 01:11 PM
11602 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#121. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


Lowden, US
          

I ran the test he asks for and here are my results.

Results at fit to screen (image straight from camera)
1/60 not visible, 1/30 not visible, 1/15 not visible,
1/8 not visible, 1/4 not visible, 1/2 not visible,
1s not visible, 2s not visible, 4s not visible, 8s not visible

Results after applying auto levels
1/60 not visible, 1/30 not visible, 1/15 not visible,
1/8 visible, 1/4 visible, 1/2 visible, 1s visible,
2s visible, 4s not visible, 8s not visible

The visible ones are not as pronounced as his examples. They are right at the edge of the frame in the area that he indicated.

____________________________

attached are the ones that showed some minor purple blooming after auto levels were applied.

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

Attachment #1, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Borut Registered since 15th Oct 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 08:23 PM
30 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#18. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 121


SI
          

Now i done the test and i have the same conclusions like dm1dave, on mine test photos is this purple blooming also visible on 4 and 8 sec photos, not so much like on samples but minor, really very minor blooming, so my conclusion is that my camera dont have any big problems, and stays even almost no visible purple blooming after applying auto levels and no visible at normal out of camera photos mine.

Borut

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

sbird Registered since 27th Mar 2004Fri 03-Nov-06 04:18 PM
13 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#6. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


US
          

Can you post a link to the location on Thom's website? I'm not having any luck finding it.

Thanks-
Bob

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
scyfreestyler Registered since 28th Sep 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 04:30 PM
148 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#7. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 6


US
          

Just what we need, another witch hunt for problems with the D80.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
klrbee25 Silver Member Nikonian since 03rd Jun 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 04:51 PM
1384 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#8. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 7


Naples, US
          

Maybe someone could explain why this is an issue. Other threads have debunked lens cap tests as a valid method for identifying hot pixels. So now we're using lens caps to test for amp noise. None of my night shots have amp noise like his photos...so why are we going through all of this?

-Alex Rosen
www.flickr.com/photos/klrbee25/

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
scyfreestyler Registered since 28th Sep 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 05:06 PM
148 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#9. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 8


US
          

So what exactly is the best way to solve this problem? The only thing I can think of right now is to remove the lens cap before taking ANY images.

I would like to see some actual images of subjects with this problem before I got too excited about it.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
klrbee25 Silver Member Nikonian since 03rd Jun 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 05:28 PM
1384 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#10. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 9


Naples, US
          

EXACTLY!

-Alex Rosen
www.flickr.com/photos/klrbee25/

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
thom Registered since 27th Jan 2002Fri 03-Nov-06 06:36 PM
48 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#14. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 9


US
          

Actually, I have samples of images that exhibit the problem that were taken of real subjects. That's what initially provoked me to look more closely at this issue.

As for the "lens cap tests aren't real tests" argument, in the case of amp noise, they are. But if you don't want to do it that way, shoot a gray card and do the same test. The reason why I have people use a lens cap is so that we can clearly see noise versus detail, not everyone has a plain gray card that matches, and we remove exposure (the amount of light in the scene) from the equation. I can clearly measure a difference in noise production in the questioned area on a gray card exposure, for example. Auto Levels will pop that out at you VERY fast.

Thom Hogan
author, Nikon Field Guide, Nikon Flash Guide
author, Complete Guides to the N65, N75, N80, F100, F5, F6
author, Complete Guides to the D1, D2h, D2x, D50, D70, D100, D200
www.bythom.com

Thom Hogan
author, Nikon Field Guide
and Nikon Flash Guide
author, Complete Guides to most Nikon cameras
www.bythom.com

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
klrbee25 Silver Member Nikonian since 03rd Jun 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 06:39 PM
1384 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#15. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 14


Naples, US
          

Alright, thanks Thom. That's fair. Anything that is affecting "real" images is surely worth investigating. So this is related to an amplifier? Do you have any idea what kind of fix this would entail? (merely an adjustment or is this a larger, part replacement issue)

Thanks,

Alex

-Alex Rosen
www.flickr.com/photos/klrbee25/

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
bclaff Silver Member Awarded for multiple contributions for the Resources Nikonian since 26th Oct 2004Sat 04-Nov-06 12:06 AM
9681 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#23. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 14


Vancouver (WA USA not Canada), US
          

Thom,

As a confirmed basher of "lens cap" tests, I would like to say that in this case it is appropriate.
Your test is designed to visually measure the thermal component of dark current.
My opposition to "lens cap" tests relates to the search for "bad" photosites, a different topic.

I seem to remember that the D70 also has this characteristic.

Thom, if you are interested in quantifying your results; drop me an e-mail.

Regards,
Bill

Visit me at My site

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
redrider Basic MemberSat 04-Nov-06 09:23 PM
288 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#36. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 23


Sanford, US
          

This is a problem for geeks to worry about, along with dust on the sensor and funny pixels. i won't lose any sleep over it.

D80, D100 18-200 VR 50mm1 1/8

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Sat 04-Nov-06 09:29 AM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#28. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 14


Paignton, GB
          

Hi, Thom.

Nice to see you posting again, and thanks for the clarification

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Delta5 Registered since 16th Jan 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 05:44 PM
260 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#11. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 8


London, GB
          

>None of my night shots have amp noise
>like his photos...so why are we going through all of this?

Just because you think your camera is okay, it does not mean we should disregard this test. Thom has already said that there seems to be wide sample variation, and part of this is to establish IF the amp noise is a widespread problem which needs to be taken up with Nikon.
If you think this is a waste of time, move on and leave it to those who are interested.

Dv
"Live like you're going to die tomorrow, learn like you're going to live forever." - Gandhi

Dave
Blue Delta Photography

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Mort82 Registered since 26th Sep 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 05:47 PM
1 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#12. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 11



          

I have the problem, the sad thing is I can easily see it in my LCD preview screen.

Alright Thom Hogan and Nikon, now what?

We have discovered a problem, now what the heck are we supposed to do? Send in our cameras to Nikon, wait 8 months for them to fix it then they send it back?

I heard about the banding nightmares on the D200, now this!?!?! Great!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Fri 03-Nov-06 05:57 PM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#13. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 12


Paignton, GB
          

>I heard about the banding nightmares on the D200, now
>this!?!?!

Banding on the D200 was, in general, much less than the "nightmare situation" some were claiming. A small proportion of D200's had bad banding; in most cases these were returned to Nikon and adjusted to the owning member's satisfaction.

If you have this problem that Thom has noticed, then I 'd suggest you have two options:

+ if you had not previously noticed it, then don't worry about it;
+ if you can't live with it, contact Nikon with clear examples and expect them to deal with it.

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Steelie Registered since 29th Oct 2006Sun 19-Nov-06 11:52 PM
19 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#65. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 12


Winchester, US
          

I can see the issue on my LCD screen as well. I read Thom's review and the serial number on my D80 is 3031067. As Thom indicated in his review, the problem seems to go away after serial number 305000.

I take photos at night for the local football team and I originally thought the purple haze was caused by the stadium lights. However the spot is always in the same location (top left of center). I agree with Thom that the camera should not be flawed. I'm heading back to Ritz in hopes of a replacement.

Jeff

Jeff

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
hwdx347 Basic MemberFri 03-Nov-06 06:55 PM
6273 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#16. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 6


Maumelle, US
          

www.bythom.com

Hedley

Hedley
Originally from Merthyr Tydfil, Wales -- now in Arkansas

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
LD Registered since 12th Jul 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 07:06 PM
9 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#17. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 16


CA
          

I'm about to do this amp noise test on my D80 when I get home later.
I use Adobe Photoshop Elements mainly.

Can someone explain to a newbie how to do the "Auto Levels" part of the instructions? I'm assuming it's some option that I can find in Adobe Photoshop Elements.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 08:58 PM
11602 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#19. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 17


Lowden, US
          

I use photo shop 7 but it should be similar in elements.

Look under the "Image" menue for "Ajustments" and "Auto Levels".

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ShawnC1032 Registered since 11th Feb 2002Fri 03-Nov-06 09:40 PM
564 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#20. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


Tampa Bay, US
          

I did the test on mine. I see nothing on the photos out of the camera. When I auto levels them I see increased noise in that area, but it only turns purple on the 8s shot.

Doesn't seem like a huge deal to me.

--
Shawn
http://www.lazyeights.net/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
F2AS Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd Nov 2005Fri 03-Nov-06 09:45 PM
486 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#21. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 20


Washington, US
          

What causes something like this? Do all DSLR's do it?

Mike

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
f_aaberg Registered since 20th Oct 2006Fri 03-Nov-06 11:50 PM
6 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#22. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 21


US
          

Could someone please post the link to the his site where this request is mentioned. TIA

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
michael_tn Registered since 23rd Mar 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 12:39 AM
53 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#24. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 22


US
          

i have a new D80. if i could find the link on thom's website i'd be glad to contribute my results.

-- michael

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 02:01 AM
11602 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#26. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 24


Lowden, US
          

His request was on the main page of his site - the first artical below the picutre. He did not post a link just ask people to e-mail him (his email address is at the bottom of the page) for instructions.

It looks like he has taken down the request. He probably has enough samples for his needs.

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
djhanson100 Registered since 09th Aug 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 12:46 AM
5 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#25. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 22


US
          

Amp glow exists in all DSLR's to some degree. It's a big topic in DSLR astrophotography due to long exposures. Canon's do seem to have less than Nikon's do - but I still like my D70 for astrophotograph (see #7):

http://www.astropix.com/HTML/M_DAP/M009/M009.HTM

Some comparisons:

http://astrosurf.com/buil/d70v10d/eval.htm
http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/20d/20dvs10d.htm
http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/5d/test.htm

When using my D70 for astrophotography (non-modified), I will get the purple amp glow as well, same location as everyone else. Apply NR, and it's completely eliminated of course (but waiting to take a dark frame is a real pain when taking a 10 min exposure!).

Best... -DJ


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
ade Registered since 03rd Apr 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 07:52 AM
211 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#27. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 25


CA
          

Unfortunately some D80 owners appear to see amp glow at 1/4s and even 1/8s... no where near "long exposure" settings.

By comparison w/ my D200 (outdoors on a cool cloudless night), on RAW files I can just see smidgen of amp glow at 30 seconds. By 4 minutes the amp glow is similar to the first image posted above. At 10 minutes the amp glow is well throughout the frame.

With NR turned on the JPEGs are "clean" even on 10 minute exposures.

-Ade
-------------------
www.barkah.org

-Ade
www.barkah.org

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Kevox Registered since 19th Sep 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 11:18 AM
14 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#29. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 27


GB
          

I sometimes wonder what "fault" people will go looking for next. Im by no means an expert photographer but Im happy with the pictures I get from the D80. I really dont care if the camera has amp noise or not and Im not going looking for it by forcing the camera to to take pictures in circumstances its not designed for i.e. Lense cap on tests.
If you are happy with the camera then smile, be happy, take pictures, rinse and repeat

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
F2AS Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd Nov 2005Sat 04-Nov-06 01:00 PM
486 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#30. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 29


Washington, US
          

I sometimes think, in this digital equipment age, that we look for every small deviation from absolute perfection in equipment, and the next thing you know it's magnified into some major issue that you oddly only read about here on the internet. If this is just something that only shows up to a significant degree by shooting in some extreme, ridiculous way, then I'm not sure it's worth losing sleep over. I'm debating between the D80 & D200, so it will be interesting to see the results and whether it really is a serious problem. I would hate paying $1000 for a camera that you can't use for night photography. For now, I'm holding off on the D80 until I hear more.

Mike

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
oldvjp1 Registered since 21st May 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 01:36 PM
1 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#31. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 30


US
          

I have a D80 purchased the first week available in US.
I ran Thom's test and I had amp glow visible using
auto levels at some extent at every shutter speed. Somewhat
more noticeable at slower speeds, but significant at every one.
FWIW I have NOT noticed this being a problem with any photos
and I have almost 5000 shutter activations on this camera.

Am I really worried, no. Am I curious, of course.

Out of curiosity we did this test on our D50 and D200 and
there was no amp glow noted.

Victoria

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
thom Registered since 27th Jan 2002Sat 04-Nov-06 03:02 PM
48 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#33. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 29


US
          

It's funny how there always seems to be some resistance to knowledge and understanding.

> I sometimes wonder what "fault" people will go looking for next.
You might want to look at my signature and then my Web site. I've been covering Nikon equipment on the Web since the early 1990's. I've got a long history of poking around at Nikon equipment and documenting its abilities and limits. What I asked people to do was perform a test so that I could ascertain a particular trait of the D80 across a wide range of sample bodies (what other reviewer do YOU know that tries to eliminate sample bias from their testing?). I was careful not to say anything about a "fault." That's YOUR word, actually; I used the words "concerned about." Why I'm concerned about it, I did not say and won't until I review the data carefully and publish my review.

> Im happy with the pictures I get from the D80
Nothing I said challenges that in any way that I can see. Generally, there are two camps of photographers out there, the casual and the serious. The casual never push their products towards their limits and are much more tolerant of minor issues. The serious want to know what the absolute limits are and when they might encounter them. You seem to be in the former group.

> forcing the camera to to take pictures in circumstances its not designed for i.e. Lense cap on tests.
Amp noise is an underlying thermally-induced production of electrons that get counted erroneously, and that exists regardless of the picture being taken. It's a relative of dark current noise, but generally specific to a location near an electronic or heat source. My test was an attempt to get a handle on exactly how much of that thermal noise underlies a photo. If you have people take photos of different things, you can't get a good measurement of the actual amount of noise and when it first appears: someone who had a purple subject at that position might not notice it at all, while someone who had a groom's black jacket at that position would most certainly notice it (that should be a hint about how I stumbled onto the issue). In scientific testing, you try to isolate all the variables except the one you're interested in. If anyone would like to debate me on the scientific validity of my testing procedure, I'll be happy to do so. I have an open mind and am more interested in getting the right data than running tests "my way." But I also have a great deal of experience at this and am confident that the procedure is adequate and that I now have the information I was trying to obtain.

Normally, amp noise only bothers folk who shoot astronomical photos, as they're the only ones shooting long enough exposures to see the problem (on some Nikon bodies you can shoot 10 minute exposures and not see visible amp noise) and they're trying to resolve pin-point objects, so any noise tends to be a major issue.

FWIW, a Nikon representative with whom I shared a single sample immediately spotted a subtle pattern in the data I too had noticed but had not mentioned, and which appears somewhat consistent across the full set of data I currently have. The pattern suggests that Nikon's manual for the D80 actually might be incorrect about how a particular feature works, though I'll have to do more testing to figure out if that's the case or not. So the types of testing I do are not random stabs at looking for faults--they're attempts to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of the equipment. Were Nikon a more open organization, I could probably get the same information with a couple of quality yearly visits to the engineering offices in Japan asking questions of the product designers, but that's another story for another day...

Thom Hogan
author, Nikon Field Guide, Nikon Flash Guide
author, Complete Guides to the N65, N75, N80, F100, F5, F6
author, Complete Guides to the D1, D2h, D2x, D50, D70, D100, D200
www.bythom.com

Thom Hogan
author, Nikon Field Guide
and Nikon Flash Guide
author, Complete Guides to most Nikon cameras
www.bythom.com

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Holmes375 Silver Member Nikonian since 09th Sep 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 07:11 PM
1523 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#35. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 33


US
          

Hello Thom,

Your efforts are appreciated by we Nikonians. I know you've had quite an influence with regard to my equipment selections.

With all the back and forth over hot pixels, matrix metering, etc., from new D80 owners, perhaps we have become a little defencive about our cameras!

Forgive us this and continue to poke away

It'll be most interesting to hear how the Auto Noise Reduction in the D80 is actually performing.

And put me down for that first D80 e-book!

Best regards,

Holmes

-Holmes
http://holmes.zenfolio.com/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
BJNicholls Gold Member Awarded for his contributions to the community and the Resources Charter MemberMon 06-Nov-06 05:39 PM
10095 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#57. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 29


Salt Lake City, US
          

Apparently the problem shows up in normal low light shooting situations, so I think you're taking an ostrich approach and dismissing the issue without looking at the real nature of the problem.

There were a number of folks who took the same "non-issue" attitude about "banding" with the D200's introduction who changed their tune when they found the noise in their photos. I trust Thom Hogan not to fan fires about insigificant issues.

BJ

Zenfolio gallery

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
ShawnC1032 Registered since 11th Feb 2002Sat 04-Nov-06 01:57 PM
564 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#32. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 27


Tampa Bay, US
          

ade,

Which first picture? Because the first picture by Thom is a 15 minute exposure.

--
Shawn
http://www.lazyeights.net/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
ade Registered since 03rd Apr 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 07:30 AM
211 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#39. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 32


CA
          

Yes like the first picture, but I did my tests in RAW with no NR. The JPEG isn't directly comparable as you may know... one is testing the amount of amp effects while the other includes NR effectiveness.

-Ade
-------------------
www.barkah.org

-Ade
www.barkah.org

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

mawess Registered since 04th Nov 2006Sat 04-Nov-06 05:50 PM
13 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#34. "Yeah! Good to see that some else has this problem too.."
In response to Reply # 0


Uppsala, SE
          

...not really, but you know what I mean...

I have made some examples of this defect public on:
http://www.matswessling.mine.nu/root/nikond80/bildfel

In my camera the glare is visible on dark objects for all shutter speeds with ISO levels above 1600 and all shutterspeeds from 1/10 and slower at ISO 1600.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 01:35 AM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#37. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 0


Burlington, CA
          

I can hardly believe the ignorance of some posters who question the purpose, validity and usefulness of Thom's test.
If you are one of these posters than, I have a news for you: some photographers use their cameras in low light and require shutter speeds that are counted not in fractions of a second but in minutes! Heck, I wish that my camera could do exposures lasting hours!!!

Yup, I consider myself to be a victim of D80's poor amp noise performance. As much as I love Nikon cameras, that particular "feature" of D80 is, in my opinion, despicable!
My first digital SLR was D50 and I got it only after making sure that it could perform at night. In fact, I chose it over D70s because of much lower amp noise. I got D80 without waiting for confirmed reports on it's long exposure performance. After all, it's a much newer and advanced model. Proper wired remote and mirror prefire made me think that Nikon did take into account low light / long exposure photography... Here comes reality check; my low priced D50, a camera that doesn't even have a lit up status LCD can run circles around D80 when it comes to amp noise!!! Well, in a sense I can consider myself lucky because with D80 I can get exposures a bit longer than 30 second without amp noise getting objectionable but, no way I could get 10 - 15 minutes exposures as I did with D50.
Higher pixel count of D80 (vs D50) is easier cropped but still, DX frame is so small that I really would like to use all of it.
Ah, to add insult to the injury; unlike with D50, D80's long exposure noise reduction does not remove all of the amp noise! Not that I fancy waiting for a camera to do the dark frame while the time and photo opportunity ticks by...
I'll be definitely taking up this issue with Nikon.


BTW If anybody wonders, I'm not astrophotographer. I just enjoy low light shooting and I hate when amp noise gets in the way of it like it did on this pix:

http://www.fotocanada.ca/Northern%20Ontario/Ontario%20North%202006%20Fall/slides/Img2006-10-10_20-30-55.html



Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Calabrais Registered since 05th Sep 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 06:01 AM
90 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#38. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 37


US
          

I am also a victim like GPSMapNut. Although I am not an astrophotographer, a few night shots I took had amp noise in them, at ISO 100 wich deterred me from really exploring my creativity with low light.

It would be very interesting to learn more about this, shall we say, "attribute" of the D80. I still LOVE this camera, but what's the harm in a little investigation?

^
With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high.
~Unknown F1 Driver

My Gallery

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Sun 05-Nov-06 09:00 AM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#40. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 37


Paignton, GB
          

Whatever we think of this potential issue, let's all try to keep calm about it and see the other guy's point of view, please. Calling other members "ignorant" is not the way we do things at Nikonians

Thanks!

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 12:41 PM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#41. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 40


Burlington, CA
          

>Whatever we think of this potential issue, let's all try to
>keep calm about it and see the other guy's point of view,
>please. Calling other members "ignorant" is not the way we
>do things at Nikonians
>
>Thanks!

I didn't mean nor wrote "ignorant" in general - that would be an offencive name calling. I was just trying to stress out apparent lack of knowledge (ignorance) in regards to long exposure requirements.

If anybody else feels offended by my use of the word "ignorance", please let me know - I will go back and edit the post to replace "ignorance" with "lack of knowledge" or whatever better word you suggest.

Regards,

Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Sun 05-Nov-06 01:10 PM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#42. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 41


Paignton, GB
          

Thanks for the offer, Andrew, but "I can hardly believe the lack of knowledge of some members..." doesn't sound a whole lot better, does it? The point is that we should all try to put our point of view across without appearing to belittle other members' views

Thanks again.

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
klrbee25 Silver Member Nikonian since 03rd Jun 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 01:21 PM
1384 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#43. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 42


Naples, US
          

Does anyone know what the 'fix' for this amp noise issue would entail?

-Alex Rosen
www.flickr.com/photos/klrbee25/

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 03:56 PM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#48. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 42


Burlington, CA
          

>Thanks for the offer, Andrew, but "I can hardly believe the
>lack of knowledge of some members..." doesn't sound a whole
>lot better, does it? The point is that we should all try to
>put our point of view across without appearing to belittle
>other members' views
>
>Thanks again.

Right. A spade is a spade no matter how we call it and that's why I call it a spade Looks like, if I'm to stick around I have to learn few things. For example; why is it acceptable to accuse Thom of a witch hunt or saying that it's a problem for geeks only yet... oh, who cares. Lets go back to the real issue - the amp glow.

Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Sun 05-Nov-06 07:04 PM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#53. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 48


Paignton, GB
          


If you check it, my original post was asking everyone to "stay calm", though I did use your post as an example. As you say, I'm sure you'll adjust to the way our community operates soon enough. It's just a question of making our points with civility and consideration.

>Lets go back to the real issue - the amp glow.

Sounds good to me...

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Artuk Registered since 20th Aug 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 01:27 PM
91 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#44. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 37


Dover, US
          


>the way of it like it did on this pix:
>
>http://www.fotocanada.ca/Northern%20Ontario/Ontario%20North%202006%20Fall/slides/Img2006-10-10_20-30-55.html
>

A picture is worth a thousand words. Nice example.

Hopefully the problem is software not hardware and can be resolved with a firmware update.

Chris

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
cla Registered since 11th Aug 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 01:49 PM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#45. "Another set of results"
In response to Reply # 44


SE
          

I went through the procedure described above and got the following results: http://picasaweb.google.com/christian.lagerkvist/D80GlareHighIso/photo#4993921953804648466

As a side note, auto-levels is a deceptive method of pointing out lens or camera anomalies, as it doesn't reveal the actual magnitude of the problem. I e no lens or camera can stand against auto-levels..

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
ade Registered since 03rd Apr 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 02:41 PM
211 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#46. "RE: Another set of results"
In response to Reply # 45


CA
          

Well, I know quite a lot of people -- especially those with jpeg based workflows -- who use "auto-levels" as a matter of routine, i.e., religiously.

And many/most raw converters do (essentially) auto-leveling by default.

-Ade
-------------------
www.barkah.org

-Ade
www.barkah.org

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
F2AS Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd Nov 2005Sun 05-Nov-06 02:50 PM
486 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#47. "RE: Another set of results"
In response to Reply # 46


Washington, US
          

I don't understand using Auto Levels in performing the test. Is that just to try to enhance or exaggerate the noise? I'll be anxious to read Thom's D80 review and the results of all these tests. I just hope it doesn't discourage me from the D80 too much, because up until now it seemed like just the DSLR I've been waiting for.

Mike

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
thom Registered since 27th Jan 2002Sun 05-Nov-06 06:09 PM
48 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#51. "RE: Another set of results"
In response to Reply # 45


US
          

I love the way that people keep assuming things. As I said, if you want to debate my testing approach, I'm more than willing to do so. But if you want to ascribe conclusions that are based upon assumptions...

> auto-levels is a deceptive method of pointing out lens or camera anomalies, as it doesn't reveal the actual magnitude of the problem.

You'll note that I asked people to perform two tests. There's a reason for both. As it turns out, the data are pretty clear: there is a subset of D80s that show the problem WITHOUT Auto Levels. I can now quantify what that percentage is. The Auto Levels test was there to verify something I already had found: while not "visible," the underlying noise structure is different in that area than it is in the rest of the frame for ALL D80s. Once I knew that the vast majority of D80 bodies performed exactly like mine, it was easy enough to devise a test that "reveals the actual magnitude of the problem." That test doesn't involve Auto Levels.

Not that Auto Levels is all that invalid. The first photo I received from someone else that showed the flaw in a real photographic situation was underexposed by a stop and he had used Auto Levels to get a quick look at whether it was savable. Auto Levels on a lens cap test will take the hot point and move it towards 255 from where it might normally be (<20 in my measurements), but even a move from a value of 20 to 50 would bring the amp noise into view most of the time. I've actually quantified it with a different set of tests, as I said earlier. There seem to be two sets of D80 bodies out there in terms of magnitude of the problem, and it seems the Auto Levels test actually can reveal which group yours belongs to. Nikon is sending me a just-off-the-line body to test and see where it stands. Based upon serial number analysis so far, my hypothesis is that it'll perform no different than the other two D80's I've been testing.

I said it before and I'll say it again: some people simply don't want to know the limitations of their camera (or car, or TV, or whatever). I don't happen to be one of them. I want to know EXACTLY what my equipment can and can't do, with as much specificity as possible. I know now, for example, that I couldn't take one of my extended photo trips where both my main and backup bodies were D80s. That's because there are a few situations where the D80 would produce results I wouldn't accept. Likewise, with the banding issue on the D200 I'm hesitant to use it as my only choice for certain situations (the gym I shoot indoor basketball at produces short banding on every D200 I've tried if the shot includes the ceiling). Perhaps you'll call me just picky. So be it. But when you're trying to sell your photos against the likes of Art Wolfe, Frans Lanting, et.al., you get picky REAL fast.

Thom Hogan
www.bythom.com

Thom Hogan
author, Nikon Field Guide
and Nikon Flash Guide
author, Complete Guides to most Nikon cameras
www.bythom.com

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
briantilley Moderator Deep knowledge of bodies and lens; high level photography skills Nikonian since 26th Jan 2003Sun 05-Nov-06 07:07 PM
29147 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#54. "RE: Another set of results"
In response to Reply # 51


Paignton, GB
          

Thanks again for the explanation, Thom

Brian
Welsh Nikonian

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
pjdonovan Registered since 28th Jan 2006Mon 22-Jan-07 03:05 PM
34 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#106. "RE: Another set of results"
In response to Reply # 51


Flagstaff, US
          

Hello,

I just read this entire thread from beginning to end and I have a question.

If the problem largely disappears in cameras that have a higher serial number, does this mean that Nikon figured out the problem and fixed it?

IOW, what is different in the later-numbered D80s than in the earlier ones? What changed?

Just curious and trying to learn..

Thanks,

Pamela <---loves her D80


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
mawess Registered since 04th Nov 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 06:13 PM
13 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#52. "RE: Another set of results"
In response to Reply # 45


Uppsala, SE
          

very interesting. I have updated my website with the result of my own test. It seems that this "feature" of the D80 differ a lot from camera to camera. I shall check with the other D80 at the dealer and see if I can change this for a better one.

my test results:
http://www.matswessling.mine.nu/root/nikond80/bildfel/

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 04:12 PM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#49. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 44


Burlington, CA
          

>>>>
>Hopefully the problem is software not hardware and can be
>resolved with a firmware update.
>
>Chris

The root of the problem is in hardware.
Firmware could provide a partial solution; Currently, D80 long exposure noise reduction is based on a dark frame that is about (exactly?) half the duration of the initial exposure. It could be changed to the full duration. D50 and D70(s) use the same duration for the dark frame as for the exposure and it works fairly well - it gets rid of the glow. The downsides are; for very long exposures resulting in very strong amp glow the affected areas have some / all channels blown and detail can not be recovered. Also; it costs time.
Speculation here: Maybe firmware could contain an amp glow map for various ISO / exposure combinations and automatically do the reduction without even taking a dark frame. I doubt that D80 has enough spare internal memory to hold so much data.
Now; if you don't mind PPing, you may create map like this yourself - just store it as a series of photographs. Than, when you have a photo that needs an amp glow fix, open it in PS, put the corresponding exposure dark frame on another layer and subtract it from the photograph.

Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Kevox Registered since 19th Sep 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 04:36 PM
14 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#50. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 49


GB
          

Ken expresses this much better than I can.
If you read the article in the link please take it in the spirit it is intended.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/2-kinds-of-photographers.htm

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sun 05-Nov-06 08:14 PM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#55. "RE: I can hardly believe the ignorance of..."
In response to Reply # 50


Burlington, CA
          

>Ken expresses this much better than I can.
>If you read the article in the link please take it in the
>spirit it is intended.
>http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/2-kinds-of-photographers.htm

Ah I know that article. Very good. I do enjoy reading Ken's articles even that I don't always agree with him. At least, unlike some well known names, he is a straight shooter and he makes clear what he writes based on first hand experience and what he writes based on what he thinks. In this particular case, Ken omitted the 3rd kind of photographers. The ones who take photos AND talk about it. I think that I'm such a case. Right; I don't "make" photos. I take them. If I was "making" them than amp noise would not bother me much - I could edit it out. Since I take photos, I want them usable from the camera and I crave for equipment that does not get in the way. Unfortunately, on my computer I have too many photos that without extensive editing are unusable because of the amp noise.
I can only hope that collective pressure will force Nikon to address the issue with D80 or, at least, pay better attention in the future designs.


Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

hmcstud Registered since 04th Nov 2005Mon 06-Nov-06 02:05 AM
45 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#56. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


Medford, US
          

Since basically all DSLRs have amp noise (I've noticed the newer canons turn off these amp circuits reducing it quite a bit) astrophotographers either use dedicated CCD cameras, or deal with it. So the question for them isn't does it exhibit noise but how much. When I first took some long exposure shots of the sky, I thought I found an incredible nebula in the sky, unfortunately that wasn't the case.

I've found the amp noise seems to be a function of exposure time and ISO. So you'd still be able to see it in ISO 100. In fact it starts to show around 45 seconds with ISO 100 (when adjusting levels to bring it out)

For all those questioning the validity of these tests, or wondering why amp noise is such a big problem. Here is an example of it showing up in real world situations. The photo is a stack of photos of the Andromeda Galaxy taken with a Canon D60 at ISO 400 for 2 minutes. I applied dark frame subtraction in photoshop, but that only helped so much. So after that I typically crop to just the part of the photo that isn't covered by the noise.

http://share.shutterfly.com/action/welcome?sid=8IaM2zdu4cuTg

I agree with Thom's tests to characterize the camera. There is a reason why his books are so thorough. However since I only find this noise to be in the top right and top left corners of the image, it won't be hard to crop out and wouldn't bug me too much for deep sky photography. Cropping is easy to do for that type of photography because its impossible to frame well the subject when it is so dark. Since framing is so much more important for terrestial based photography, cropping isn't to ideal. It would be great to have a good idea of when it rears its ugly head.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
yunfat Registered since 22nd Dec 2006Tue 07-Nov-06 02:40 AM
159 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#58. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 56


US
          

Have to chime in on this one... it is a problem for me. Amp glow is significant on my d80, with moderate length exposures (5-10 minutes) NR off.

For a big example...

http://homepage.mac.com/taran/screenshot_06.jpg

You can see the purplish glow in the corners top right and bottom right corners. Most of my nighttime stuff is BW, so for me its not critical, and I will be trying NR next time. It is there howver, and these are pretty bright 5 minute exposures on a night with a full moon, not even what I would quantify as adventurous stuff (read really long and really dark).

I would love a firmware fix for this, but I am still happy with my d80.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Tue 07-Nov-06 11:32 AM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#59. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 58


Burlington, CA
          

>Have to chime in on this one... it is a problem for me. Amp
>glow is significant on my d80, with moderate length
>exposures (5-10 minutes) NR off.
>
>For a big example...
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/taran/screenshot_06.jpg
>
>You can see the purplish glow in the corners top right and
>bottom right corners. >>>>>snip>>>

If this image isn't cropped than, I think you should consider yourself lucky! At 10 minutes my D80 has much stronger glow in the corners.

I almost forgot; Soon after I got the D80 I wrote a small article about it's amp glow.
http://www.topocanada.com/Photo%20articles/D80%20vs%20D50%20amp%20glow.html
BTW. This article will be moved to my www.fotocanada.ca website so, if the above link doesn't work, you know where to look for it.


Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
yunfat Registered since 22nd Dec 2006Wed 08-Nov-06 04:24 AM
159 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#60. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 59


US
          


>If this image isn't cropped than, I think you should
>consider yourself lucky! At 10 minutes my D80 has much
>stronger glow in the corners.
>
>I almost forgot; Soon after I got the D80 I wrote a small
>article about it's amp glow.
>http://www.topocanada.com/Photo%20articles/D80%20vs%20D50%20amp%20glow.html
>BTW. This article will be moved to my www.fotocanada.ca
>website so, if the above link doesn't work, you know where
>to look for it.
>
>
>Andrew Kalinowski

I am sorry to hear of your troubles, and obviously I am in the same boat (shooting in the warm Florida heat doesn't help). I don't want to start a review of the camera until this issue is resolved because it torpedoes nighttime photos with my d80. I want to make sure its not something Nikon can't get fixed via firmware. It's sad, because I consider the D80 to be the ultimate nighttime camera, long battery life, nice remote, exposure delay (somehting the d70 lacked), nice small remote. It was a perfect night time tripod setup. Not only that, the rest of the image unnaffected by amp glow is stunning, imho, ISO 100 is really nice too.

Guess its time to pony up for that nikon $150 remote for my d2. Doh!.

Anyone have a PS technique to minimize the damage, or can think of a fix... I will be in your debt. Anyone get a response from Nikon... please keep us informed.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

RichardBrandt Registered since 19th May 2006Fri 17-Nov-06 11:19 PM
19 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#61. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


US
          

I'm confused about this 'amp noise'. Why would noise in the amplifier appear near the edges in the frame repeatably, and not be randomly distributed throughout the frame? I suspect there is something more going on, perhaps in the way the detector is scanned. Does anyone know the details of the physics of this noise? And how temperature sensitive is it?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ade Registered since 03rd Apr 2006Sat 18-Nov-06 12:12 AM
211 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#62. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 61


CA
          

Amplifiers emit energy which -- if not controlled -- gets captured by the sensor as amp noise. So, pixels near an amplifier will be affected more than those farther away.

-Ade
-------------------
www.barkah.org

-Ade
www.barkah.org

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
thom Registered since 27th Jan 2002Sat 18-Nov-06 12:36 AM
48 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#63. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 61


US
          

"Amp noise" is just a generic term for the issue. I suspect the origin of the term goes all the way back into the analog audio world, actually. The actual noise may or may not be caused by an "amplifier" circuit. The type I'm referring to on a digital camera is usually (but not always) caused by heat from a nearby electronic circuit. It could be caused by almost any heat source.

Thom Hogan
www.bythom.com

Thom Hogan
author, Nikon Field Guide
and Nikon Flash Guide
author, Complete Guides to most Nikon cameras
www.bythom.com

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Wed 22-Nov-06 01:13 AM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#66. "Maybe it's not heat..."
In response to Reply # 63


Burlington, CA
          

I just finished shooting 4 dark frames, 660 seconds exposures, 1 second between exposures so there is no way the sensor / camera could cool down between the exposures. The long exposure NR was off and I was shooting RAW and compared in NX after making sure that the base adjustments turned off any "auto" image settings. To say that the results surprised me would be an understatement. Well, with every subsequent image, the area affected was smaller!!!!!!

The images are now included closer to the end of my article at:
http://www.fotocanada.ca/Articles/D50%20vs%20D80%20amp%20glow%20images/D80%20vs%20D50%20amp%20glow.html


Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
RichardBrandt Registered since 19th May 2006Wed 29-Nov-06 03:12 PM
19 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#68. "RE: Maybe it's not heat..."
In response to Reply # 66


US
          

I have a guess of what might be happening here, although I dont know anything about the details of the D80's circuits. I've built spectroradiometers for measuring atmospheric solar radiation and I'm quite familiar with silicon and InGaAs photodiodes. For a variety of reasons they don't produce zero electrical signal (in their case current) when there is no light. This is called 'dark current', or 'dark noise' and can be eliminated either in the analog electronics with a chopper, or digitally as post-processing with reference scans.

As I say, I'm just guessing, but it may also be done somehow in CCD circuits, and if so, it may assume that the CCD is at a constant and uniform temperature. If that's the case, a thoroughly warmed up CCD might have the worst of it's 'dark noise' removed, but a CCD that is in the process of warming up from it's edges may show your 'glow'.

My guess is as much likely to be wrong as right, so take it for what it's worth - not much...

Do you notice variability in the glow if you shoot outdoors in the summer vs winter?




  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
RichardBrandt Registered since 19th May 2006Wed 29-Nov-06 02:37 PM
19 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#67. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 63


US
          

>"Amp noise" is just a generic term for the issue. I suspect
>the origin of the term goes all the way back into the analog
>audio world, actually. The actual noise may or may not be
>caused by an "amplifier" circuit.

Thanks for your reply Thom, thats what I suspected. However I would argue that it is not the CCD's analog differential amplifier or A/D circuits as they sequentially sample (or to a small degree, say x16, parallel sample, don't know for Nikon D80) so patterned noise would not be expected.

>The type I'm referring to on a digital camera is usually (but not
>always) caused by heat from a nearby electronic circuit.
>It could be caused by almost any heat source.

I agree, and the patterning suggests that it is nonuniform thermal noise in the CCD itself (a part of the CCD's 'dark noise'). For that reason I'd suggest calling it a 'thermal glow' issue rather than an 'amp glow' issue.

I found an excellent primer on noise in CCD based systems on Nikon's microscopy web site here.

It's notable that Nikon points out:

"Although great improvements have been made over the past few years in the reduction of CCD dark noise at room temperature, cooling the chip further reduces the noise tenfold per 20° C decrease."

Perhaps those of us who do long exposure will figure out how to chill our detectors like the astronomers?

-Rich

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sat 18-Nov-06 01:59 AM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#64. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 61


Burlington, CA
          

The first time I learnt about this particular issue it was from a D70 user. He and many others refereed to it as "amp glow". The theory behind it was that it is cause by heating of the amplifier circuit that is integrated with and located on the edge of the sensor chip. Depending on the actual architecture of the sensor, the glow will show at one or more corners or edges. D50 shows it in one corner. D200 shows it in all corners (I think), D80 both upper corners...
having said that, I think that Thom is right (as always) and that there may be a number of heat sources contributing to uneven warming up of the sensor.

Maybe if we all call it "amp glow" it will not be so easily confused with noise that may be distributed all over the sensor.

BTW Thom, how's your D80 ebook coming along? I curse D80 amp glow but still like the camera so, I'm in line for your book.

Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
RichardBrandt Registered since 19th May 2006Wed 29-Nov-06 05:02 PM
19 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#69. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 64


US
          

I must admit that I was skeptical that the amplifier(s) were the likely problem in 'amp glow', but a quick google search on 'amp glow' found that the ultimate long exposure night sky camera, the Hubble Space Telescope, has an 'amplifier glow' issue!! More here.

The HST problem (or in NASA speak, 'performance anomaly'), is apparently due to four corner mounted amplifiers emitting IR.
f
The HST detector is kept very cold, so the D80 performance anomaly could be related to heat and/or IR. In any event, if I had bothered to google 'amp noise', I wouldn't have wasted everyone's time with my posts above. Sorry for that.

So the bad news is that amp glow may not be corrected by detector cooling, although if IR is the source, a before and after D80 IR conversion test (removing the IR filter) should answer that question clearly.

The good news is that our cameras don't have a problem, they have a 'performance anomaly' that is shared with a camera/lens system that cost billions!

-Rich

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

JDL_1 Registered since 16th Nov 2006Mon 04-Dec-06 03:13 AM
31 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#70. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


Greenville, US
          

Regardless of the cause of this issue, my D80 has completely unacceptable "amp" noise for a camera like this.

I get easily visible noise against dark backgrounds with indoor pictures at iso 1600 period. Any shutter speed, and with no auto-leveling at all. This is with noise reduction off. It is fully visible in the lcd.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
James23p Moderator Awarded for his wide variety of skills, a true generalist both in film and digital photography Nikonian since 25th Apr 2004Sat 09-Dec-06 12:34 PM
9742 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#71. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 70


Memphis, US
          

I am late to this party but I tried Thoms test last night and I have an early model number and to my surprise I have no amp glow visable prior to auto levels at any of the shutter speeds tested as per the instructions. When I use the auto levels in elements I get a small amp glow about a third of the way from the left on the top of the picture just one, none in the corners( I wish I had saved the test pictures).

Now my question if I do not get it until I add auto levels how does this affect everyday photography when not applying auto levels(I am not the best at photoshopping). The good news is mine is small enough to crop out without losing to much. Sorry the late question. Jim

Share, Learn and Inspire
www.nikonians.org




I will use film until the last roll and last lab are gone. Go Navy

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
kocho Basic MemberSat 09-Dec-06 02:37 PM
1756 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#72. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 71


Metro DC, US
          

>I am late to this party but I tried Thoms test last night
>and I have an early model number and to my surprise I have
>no amp glow visable prior to auto levels at any of the
>shutter speeds tested as per the instructions. When I use
>the auto levels in elements I get a small amp glow about a
>third of the way from the left on the top of the picture( I
>wish I had saved the test pictures).
>
>Now my question if I do not get it until I add auto levels
>how does this affect everyday photography when not applying
>auto levels(I am not the best at photoshopping). The good
>news is mine is small enough to crop out without losing to
>much. Sorry the late wuestion. Jim

I had an "early" model 40,000 mark S/N, then a "late" model of 90,000+ number and contrary to Thom's 50,000 + magic mark, both had the same three-area glow pattern.

Both, like in your case, have no visible amp glow even at ISO1600 at 30 seconds, so not an issue for me. It may become visible in severely underexposed photos with black on the edge, but those would be so bad otherwise that I'm not sure it matters...

To the other poster - if yours has visible glow without post processing at less than 15-30 second exposures at ISO1600 I would certainly consider that a problem to be replaced/repaired.

My PBase Gallery Favorites

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
James23p Moderator Awarded for his wide variety of skills, a true generalist both in film and digital photography Nikonian since 25th Apr 2004Sat 09-Dec-06 04:53 PM
9742 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#73. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 72


Memphis, US
          

Thanks that is what I was thinking. I tried some real life 30 second exposures and even with a little tweeking I didn't get the AMP glow only using the auto levels. But to be honest my D50 is so good at long exposures I probobly still use it. Thanks again. Jim

Share, Learn and Inspire
www.nikonians.org




I will use film until the last roll and last lab are gone. Go Navy

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
D dub Registered since 10th Dec 2006Sun 10-Dec-06 11:58 PM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#74. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 73


US
          

Ok I'm relatively new to photography and really new to DSLRs. I need to throw a question out to the group. I have a pretty low serial number with the expected high amount of amp glow associated with it (I was recently trying to shoot a star trail shot, that's how I found out I had this issue and when I started looking into it). The exposure time was almost 14 min and it appears 3 large stars are moving in from the top of the frame. As neat as it may look, it's not really what I was going for, now or in the future. Being a novice my questions are:

What are the chances Nikon will do something about this (i.e. have us send in our cameras for repair)?

I am wrestling with holding on to this low serial number camera, accepting the amp glow for now, and wait to see if Nikon cares to fix it or take it back to Circuit City (not so good experiences there) and try to tell the salespeople I want to exchange the camera, why I want to exchange it, and then attempt to test the higher serial number cameras until I find one that has less amp glow than my current one.

I'm looking for experience driven responses. If you're going to tell me that amp glow is no big deal and I need to stop whining about it, please don't respond. It's a big deal to me.

Thanks

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Mon 11-Dec-06 12:37 AM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#75. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 74


Burlington, CA
          

For sure, complain to Nikon. They may appear to ignore you but, eventually, if enough of us complains, they will have to address address the problem. As for any manufacturer, it's not a problem if nobody or very few people complain but, the squeaky wheel gets the grease so, we have to squeak
As for taking it back to Circuit City; as a Canadian I have no experience with them but, I thing, that if you do and document the reason for return, they will be returning the camera to Nikon with the reason noted somewhere so... the same logic follows: with enough returns, Nikon will have to face the music and do something about the noise!

Andrew Kalinowski

Some photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006Mon 11-Dec-06 03:43 PM
11602 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#76. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 74


Lowden, US
          

Frankly I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for Nikon to fix this problem. Like GPSMapNut said below “the squeaky wheel gets the grease” but this problem is likely to only really affect a small percentage of D80 buyers. Nikon will probably just see this as a limitation of this camera model especially since all DSLR’s have at least some Amp Glow. A recall to fix the problem would be quite expensive. I think the best we can hope for is that future camera production will solve this.

Your option of exchanging it for a higher serial number camera could work BUT finding a retailer (especially Circuit City) who will let you keep exchanging several cameras will be difficult.

This is an important issue for your shooting so maybe the D80 (because of this limitation) is not the best camera for you. I think the best option is to return or sell the camera and find a model that is know for producing the results you need. It seems that the D50 is a good choice. I would research cameras from all manufacturers to find the best one for this specific need.

The D80 is a great camera and the vast majority of users will probably never see this issue therefore Nikon is unlikely to recall and fix cameras.

Dave Summers
Lowden, Iowa
Nikonians Photo Contest Director

Nikonians membership -
"My most important photographic investment, after the camera"

My Nikonians Gallery | SummersPhotoGraphic.com | My Crated Gallery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Showcase your best work in any of our 7 Monthly Nikonians Photo contests.


Wildlife | Landscape | Macro | Sports | Travel | Online Assignments | Best of Nikonians 2014

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
sj Registered since 15th Dec 2006Fri 15-Dec-06 06:49 PM
1 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#77. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 74



          

I also have the amp noise problem. I sent some image samples to Nikon and got the reply that this behaviour is within design parameters and that their cameras are not designed to work with high ISO and long exposure times of 20 sec. However, I have the amp noise even on
1. ISO100 and with exposure time of 4 sec.
2. ISO1600 and with exposure time of 1/4 sec.
Did anyone else get Nikon to fix/replace their camera because of amp noise?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Ricky11 Registered since 30th Nov 2006Fri 15-Dec-06 09:59 PM
125 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#78. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 77


Ponce de Leon, US
          

When I got my D80 I was immediately concerned with some of the problems here - and I guess they do exist, but I love my D80. The benefits of this camera FAR outweigh any drawbacks. The images I get are incredible; the feel professional, the possibilities endless - I love it!

Ricky

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
JDL_1 Registered since 16th Nov 2006Sat 16-Dec-06 09:16 PM
31 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#79. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 77


Greenville, US
          

As soon as Christmas is over mine is going to Nikon.

I'll just try keeping my pictures in the range of 100-350 iso. If an appropriate exposure will not happen in that range I'll just consider the shot lost.

I've seen the "glo" with my camera in properly exposed nature shots outdoors, at 400 iso.

I made the mistake of first sending in to Nikon USA some pictures I took at a concert. Of course the immediate response was that the level was normal.

The only way they could honestly determine defect would be against specifications for the Sony sensor. I hope they can do that.

I cannot find published specs for the Sony sensor however. The only specs I do find is that the sensor is supposed to be capable of iso 100-1600. Mine is not capable of this, at least in no way to be producing what I call acceptable quality for my money spent.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
triumph1 Registered since 02nd Jan 2005Mon 18-Dec-06 10:44 PM
36 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#80. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 79



          

So, should Nikon add the disclaimer" Not to be used for nightime photography" on it's promotional materials? Is it reasonable to expect A $1000 camera to have this limitation? I think this is astonishing! If Nikon had tried this with their"stellar" film cameras can you imagine the collective uproar? "Warning: "bulb option has been removed."

Hackneyed cliches are a dime a dozen

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
hbenas Registered since 29th Jul 2006Wed 20-Dec-06 08:28 PM
15 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#82. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 80


US
          

i also noticed the problem on my camera. i had the iso at 100 using the 50/1.4 (set at 5.6) with a 900 second shutter speed. that is not a misprint. I set it to bulb and left the shutter open for about 15 minutes. i was trying to get some night shots in since i was in the middle of nowhere (no ambient light). when i got home i saw substantial purple noise radiating out of the top corners.

Has anyone called Nikon? If not I will post their response




_______
Nikon d80, tamron 17-50 f2.8, sigma 70-200 f2.8 macro, nikon 50 f1.4

They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
sahunt Registered since 03rd Jan 2007Wed 03-Jan-07 08:12 PM
74 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#83. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 82


GB
          

I'm joining the thread (and the forum) late, but I can add another data-point.

I have a D80 purchased just before xmas. Its serial number is 8005xxx (maybe a different factory or production run than the much lower 3xxxxx numbers that other folks have? It was bought in England so maybe we get a different range of serial numbers).

I did the dark frame tests and sure enough the amp noise is present, but it's smaller in area than some of the examples posted by Thom and others. It's hard to see without auto-levelling. Only the off-centre glow is really noticeable, I don't seem to have the corner ones. The shutter speed doesn't seem to make a lot of difference, it certainly doesn't require a long exposure, I've seen it at 1/60.

So I went out of my way to reproduce it in a real shot. Yes, it can be done relatively easily; e.g. 1/30 sec at f3.5 and ISO1600 in a poorly lit room with a dark object at the top of the frame. Strangely enough, in the real shots that exhibit it, it's relatively easy to see without any post-processing.

It's a bit disappointing to find a flaw like this on a camera. But I think the reality is that this will affect fewer than 1 in 100 real pictures of the type I actually take, and the crop needed to lose it is only about 5% of the vertical frame height, so it's not a deal-breaker for me. I can understand people who take a different mix of shots may feel differently. I like everything else about the camera so far and haven't run into the other issues that people have reported (flash exposure, battery gauge).

One trick that I discovered while playing: if I can't see any amp glow in a shot using the LCD but I want to be confident it's not going to appear during post-processing, the glow can sometimes be developed in the camera using "D-lighting (enhanced)" in the Retouch menu. That makes a new copy of the photo so I can check & delete if satisfied, re-shoot if not.

-- Steve



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
Orbit1 Registered since 08th Oct 2006Wed 03-Jan-07 09:23 PM
32 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#84. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 83


GB
          

Just about the D80 serial numbers, i learned that US models are prefixed 30xxxxx and UK models start with a 80xxxxx prefix.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
F2AS Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd Nov 2005Wed 03-Jan-07 11:03 PM
486 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#85. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 84


Washington, US
          

The serial number on my new D80 is 3083891, and I see no evidence of amp glow on any normal pictures, including a lot of longer exposure night photos I've done. Evidently this issue has been resolved with the later units. Just out of curiousity, I did run the test that Thom Hogan mentions, and only when I run auto levels, is there an indication of purple "glow" at the top of the frame about 2/5 over from the left. Since I won't be shooting too many photos with my lens cap on and then, on top of that, running auto levels, I should be OK.

Mike

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
smattingly Registered since 27th Dec 2006Thu 04-Jan-07 02:15 AM
16 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#86. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 85



          

I have a serial number that is well past the serial numbers mentioned above. I just did the test and sure enough my "amp glow" starts in the very first test shot when looked at with Auto Levels. I can still return my camera, but I need to try some real world shots and see what happens. Another thing I noticed is what looks like two "hot pixels" tiny spots that are in every image. Is this something I should worry about? (The camera is about a week old.) I haven't noticed them in pictures and I haven't done this type of test with my D2X, so I don't have anything to compare it too. Thx!!!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
D dub Registered since 10th Dec 2006Tue 09-Jan-07 08:03 PM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#91. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 85


US
          

Mike,
How long are your exposures for the night photos that are not showing amp glow. I have an early serial number that shows the glow at 120 sec. I'm debating still whether or not to send it back to Nikon.

D

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
sahunt Registered since 03rd Jan 2007Thu 04-Jan-07 09:36 AM
74 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#87. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 83


GB
          

I said:

>I don't seem to have the corner ones.

Well, it seems I do, but only on longer exposures. Even at ISO100 if I do a 5 minute bulb exposure with the lens cap on, the purple corners are clearly visible on the LCD with no post-processing. In this case though the off-centre blob is absent.

If I do 5 minutes at ISO1600 then I get the corners (a bit bigger) AND the off-centre blob too. The off-centre blob isn't much worse than it is at shorter exposures (1/30th) at the same ISO1600.

Which suggests to me that the corner blobs are more senstive to exposure duration, and the central one is more sensitive to ISO speed.

(FWIW I had long exposure NR set to "off" and high ISO NR set to "norm".)

-- Steve

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
smattingly Registered since 27th Dec 2006Thu 04-Jan-07 12:42 PM
16 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#88. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 87



          

Hi,

I should have mentioned that I only have the center blob. I did not see any indication of the corners on my camera (with the higher serial number.) I did some real world tests and it isn't nearly as evident, although did not go as high as 5 minutes. I did not try lower ISO's, either. For me, in retrospect, this is not a deal breaker either, but I can certainly understand the frustration if you take a lot of high ISO, long exposure pictures.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
kocho Basic MemberThu 04-Jan-07 01:37 PM
1756 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#89. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 88


Metro DC, US
          

Serial numbers in the US start with 3, evidently. My d80 is 31,09xxx.

I just did 30s exposure at iso1600. Tried the 4 possible NR settings:

Long NR/High ISO NR
-------------------
OFF/ON
OFF/OFF
ON/ON
ON/OFF

In neither can I see it without auto levels. In fact, it only begins to be barely noticeable in purely black areas at 100% only after a level adjustment that correspond to more than +3 EV in my estimate: slider pulled left to about 160 on the histogram (from 255 total). This is a terrible underexposure that would in itself usually render a photo unusable in most cases. So any amp glow would be pretty much irrelevant there as I would most likely be discarding the photo. At this point you may begin to see it if you pixel peep carefully, after the level adjustment of about +3 stops. But it will not show in any "real life" photo unless you also bump the brightness or apply further EV compensation.

The only thing I see is a few stuck pixels, that are eliminated if long exposure NR is on...

At iso100 at 30 seconds with or without the NR, there are no stuck pixels at 30s. And the image is so clean that even after autolevels there is absolutely no evidence of any amp glow. In fact, I was surprised to see that there is almost no change in what the black looks compared to wihtout autolevels: unlike the case at ISO1600 where after autolevels it is all grey with pink on top where the amp glow shows, at ISO100 it is almost pure black/very dark grey all over with no indication of the areas with amp glow.

For all practical purposes that I intend to use the camera in, there is no way this thing is going to affect me (I hope ) But if you shoot 15 minutes or more, I guess it may become a real issue based on the reports here and elsewhere...

My PBase Gallery Favorites

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
cliveg Registered since 19th Dec 2006Thu 04-Jan-07 11:19 PM
32 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#90. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 89


Sydney, AU
          

Aha! Thanks to those who have identified this problem, I've been scratching my head for the last couple of weeks wondering why I had purple patches in the top left and right corners of my very first attempt at capturing the movement of the stars (about 30 minute exposure).
That's one photo out of a few thousand perfect (daytime and "normal" nightime ones so I'm not too fussed. All my other normal nightime long exposures have been fine (sub 5 minutes).
Still I can understand if you were an astro type person why you wouldn't be too impressed.
cheers
Clive

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
michaejlt Registered since 29th Jan 2007Sat 20-Jan-07 10:22 AM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#92. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 90



          

Darn...I just brought this camera two weeks ago based on all of the great reviews...now I read this!

This is my first DSLR Camera purchase.

Taking it back tomorrow and picking up Canon's EOS 30D for a couple hundred dollars more...that's too bad...I really liked the D80 :'(





  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
kocho Basic MemberSat 20-Jan-07 01:35 PM
1756 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#93. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 92


Metro DC, US
          

>Darn...I just brought this camera two weeks ago based on all
>of the great reviews...now I read this!
>
>This is my first DSLR Camera purchase.
>
>Taking it back tomorrow and picking up Canon's EOS 30D for
>a couple hundred dollars more...that's too bad...I really
>liked the D80 :'(

Give both a try. They are different. And make sure you read the 30D complaints threads too before going for it

My PBase Gallery Favorites

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sat 20-Jan-07 03:15 PM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#94. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 92


Burlington, CA
          

>Darn...I just brought this camera two weeks ago based on all
>of the great reviews...now I read this!
>
>This is my first DSLR Camera purchase.
>
>Taking it back tomorrow and picking up Canon's EOS 30D for
>a couple hundred dollars more...that's too bad...I really
>liked the D80 :'(

Just to be clear; Are you saying that you have used the camera for 2 weeks and you didn't have a problem using it till you read this?
May I suggest that you define (for yourself) what features / performance characteristics are truly important to you and choose a camera that does the best what YOU need and simply ignore complaints about features that have no bearing on what is truly important to you.

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
D dub Registered since 10th Dec 2006Sat 20-Jan-07 07:49 PM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#95. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 94


US
          

Does anyone know if the amp glow has been fixed? Or at least significantly reduced? F2AS mentioned above that his high serial number (308xxxx) doesn't even show amp glow with long exposure night shots. Just curious Mike, how long was the exposure for those? Mine (300xxxx) shows it at 120sec.

D

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
F2AS Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd Nov 2005Sat 20-Jan-07 08:25 PM
486 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#96. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 95


Washington, US
          

After learning more about my camera and doing some more testing, yes, I find that I do get some "amp glow" in the upper left & right hand corners, and some in the upper middle-left shooting at 4 minutes or so with the lens cap on (which is dumb I know).

I haven't noticed this in any "normal" pictures, but can't say it's not there in some form or another. Based on my D80, I doubt if there is any real difference in the early D80's vs. the later ones with regards to this issue. I'm still OK with it because I don't use it for that kind of photography. If others hadn't brought the issue up, I would have never known it was there. Maybe I should just stay away from these forums!

and I might add that it's not just the D80 that does this. Here is a D70 shot with a 5 minute exposure

http://frank.kujawski.org/blog/2005/Jul/03/Stars/dsc_3916.html

And I understand the D200 has the same issue. For some reason the D80 has gotten a worse rap for it.

Mike

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
michaejlt Registered since 29th Jan 2007Sat 20-Jan-07 10:12 PM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#97. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 96



          

**GPSMapNut wrot *
"Just to be clear; Are you saying that you have used the camera for 2 weeks and you didn't have a problem using it till you read this?
May I suggest that you define (for yourself) what features / performance characteristics are truly important to you and choose a camera that does the best what YOU need and simply ignore complaints about features that have no bearing on what is truly important to you."



Hello...everyone...as you can see I'm new to the Nikon world and this excellent forum.

GPSMapNut you are correct...however when I first read about this "purple amp glow" problem I was very surprise and upset at first. My previous camera for eight years was Cannon A-1 SLR and gave me years of great photos. I'm just an amateur photographer.

For me spending this kind of money and then to find out that the D80 has this major defect or problem bother me to no end last night because I thought I was buying a quality product from Nikon.

Nikon has always made a quality camera as long as I can remember...but they were out of my price range back in the day.

I realize I may not ever run into this problem because I don't take many photographs in that scenario but my concerns are will this problem just get worse with age of this camera and reared it's ugly head over time I'm afraid!

**kocho wrot *
"Give both a try. They are different. And make sure you read the 30D complaints threads too before going for it."

Yes I will kocho...thanks


Best Regards


Michael

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
danamc Gold Member Charter MemberSat 20-Jan-07 11:40 PM
596 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#98. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 97


Framingham, US
          

As Thom says in his review of the D200, which has a similar sensor to the D80:

"You'll see very visible amp noise along virtually all the edge boundaries of the frame on a 15 minute exposure. Indeed, in almost all ways, the D200 amp noise is worse than the D70 amp noise, as it extends to many parts of the frame (the D70’s is mostly in the upper left). And after the excellent amp noise of the D50 I was expecting more from the D200. I didn’t get it. Long exposure noise reduction does reduce the visibility of amp noise considerably, but the D200 won’t be making its way into astrophotography circles, I think"

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
F2AS Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd Nov 2005Sun 21-Jan-07 01:36 AM
486 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#99. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 97


Washington, US
          

Michael, for what it's worth, the D80 does not have any major defects. It's a great camera. There have been countless professional reviews on the D80 posted on the internet, where it has been thoroughly tested. All of the opinions have been very favorable, if not glowing (no pun intended). Popular Photography just named it the best 10 megapixel DSLR in its price range, and I'm sure that was for a reason. This amp glow matter has been blown way out of proportion in my opinion. I just took mine out tonight and got some great long exposure shots of our little town lit up at night. I think you'll find that no camera is ever going to be absolutely perfect in every situation and have no limitations (except Canons I guess).

>Hello...everyone...as you can see I'm new to the Nikon world
>and this excellent forum.
>
>GPSMapNut you are correct...however when I first read about
>this "purple amp glow" problem I was very surprise and upset
>at first. My previous camera for eight years was Cannon A-1
>SLR and gave me years of great photos. I'm just an amateur
>photographer.
>
>For me spending this kind of money and then to find out that
>the D80 has this major defect or problem bother me to no end
>last night because I thought I was buying a quality product
>from Nikon.
>
>Nikon has always made a quality camera as long as I can
>remember...but they were out of my price range back in the
>day.
>
>I realize I may not ever run into this problem because I
>don't take many photographs in that scenario but my concerns
>are will this problem just get worse with age of this camera
>and reared it's ugly head over time I'm afraid!
>
>**kocho wrot *
>"Give both a try. They are different. And make sure you
>read the 30D complaints threads too before going for
>it."

>
>Yes I will kocho...thanks
>
>
>Best Regards
>
>
>Michael

Mike

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sun 21-Jan-07 02:32 AM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#100. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 97


Burlington, CA
          

>>>>
>GPSMapNut you are correct...however when I first read about
>this "purple amp glow" problem I was very surprise and upset
>at first. My previous camera for eight years was Cannon A-1
>SLR and gave me years of great photos. I'm just an amateur
>photographer.
>
>For me spending this kind of money and then to find out that
>the D80 has this major defect or problem bother me to no end
>last night because I thought I was buying a quality product
>from Nikon.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>Michael

Michael,

It's all a matter of perspective. For guys like me, night photography is very important so, *we* complain about anything that impairs it. If you read this thread, you will find that most never had a clue about the existence of this problem because, for most it's not really a problem at all so, there is no "major defect" with D80. The fact is that all digital cameras have problems with truly long exposures and that D80 isn't all that bad with it but *we* want it better. Heck, for true astro photography, there are cameras with supercooled sensors and other enhancements... Anyway; my point is twofold.
1. For any camera, you will find a group complaining about a feature or two. You may go for a different camera but, whatever camera it will be, it will have a "problem" a group of people will complain about.
2. D80 is truly very fine camera. If it wasn't, I would return it right after I purchased it. Consider this: Even that long exposures are important to me and D80 is not my first digital. Even that I knew the extend of the D80 amp noise within the hours of the purchase; I decided to keep it because, despite my complaints, it's one hell of a good camera and what I'm getting out of it, proved to me that I was right keeping it. So, I will continue to use it, be happy with it and I will continue to complain about it at the same time.

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
michaejlt Registered since 29th Jan 2007Sun 21-Jan-07 06:58 AM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#101. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 100



          

Andrew wrote:

>Michael,
>
>It's all a matter of perspective. For guys like me, night
>photography is very important so, *we* complain about
>anything that impairs it. If you read this thread, you will
>find that most never had a clue about the existence of this
>problem because, for most it's not really a problem at all
>so, there is no "major defect" with D80. The fact is that
>all digital cameras have problems with truly long exposures
>and that D80 isn't all that bad with it but *we* want it
>better. Heck, for true astro photography, there are cameras
>with supercooled sensors and other enhancements... Anyway;
>my point is twofold.
>1. For any camera, you will find a group complaining about a
>feature or two. You may go for a different camera but,
>whatever camera it will be, it will have a "problem" a group
>of people will complain about.
>2. D80 is truly very fine camera. If it wasn't, I would
>return it right after I purchased it. Consider this: Even
>that long exposures are important to me and D80 is not my
>first digital. Even that I knew the extend of the D80 amp
>noise within the hours of the purchase; I decided to keep it
>because, despite my complaints, it's one hell of a good
>camera and what I'm getting out of it, proved to me that I
>was right keeping it. So, I will continue to use it, be
>happy with it and I will continue to complain about it at
>the same time.
>
>Andrew Kalinowski

F2AS wrote:
Popular Photography just named it the best 10 megapixel DSLR in its price range, and I'm sure that was for a reason.
This amp glow matter has been blown way out of proportion in my opinion.




Thanks guys for your replies.
As I've said before this is my first major purchase of a DSLR camera and I overreacted.
I realize no camera is perfect....not even Cannon products


Best Regards

Michael


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
andrewylan Registered since 24th Aug 2007Mon 22-Jan-07 07:35 PM
5 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#107. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 101



          

Michael,

This issue bothered me a lot during my camera purchasing process as well. It does seem to be a pretty bad defect, plus the so-called over-exposure issue. I went to the camera stores multiple times, tried out Nikon D80, D200, Canon 30D, XTi (400D), etc. Even though Canon 30D feels good, the Nikon body still feels better (yeah, even with the plastic D80). So, I was struggling whether I should let this issue bothers me. Then I read this reply from Thom Hogan on DPReview Forum, he said:

==
> If this camera is
> really that bad, I'm going to seriously consider other options,
> even Canon.
"really that bad..." Sigh.

People read what they want into things posted on the Internet, and others amplify or shout what they think. One person who performed the test I suggested and who was completely happy with D80 before that point, now thinks its the worst thing he's ever bought. Funny, it still takes the same nice pictures it did before he bumped into me ;~)
==

Then I look at some D80 pictures on Flickr, Photosigs, and other personal websites. Then I realize that even though this is indeed a serious defect if you are into astrophotography or long exposure at night that with high ISO, the chance that I gets bothered by it is probably close to 0%. I want a camera that can help me preserve memory in my life with my family and friends, D80 is more than capable of doing that without worrying about the "amp glow" issue. So, I decide to go for it. My S/N is 3068xxxx, I did perform the test and found glow but not likely I would do those in live shooting.

For the equipment, I think that the handling is more important than features. If you like Nikon's handling and have no major issue with some of the flaws, then you should be fine. If you enjoy Canon's handling, then go for it. Besides... Even Hubble Space Telescope suffers from amp glow...

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
GPSMapNut Registered since 05th Nov 2006Sun 21-Jan-07 12:56 PM
42 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#102. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 100


Burlington, CA
          


Michael,

To help you put the amp glow problem into perspective; have a look at few of my long exposure D80 shots that are within my gallery at
http://www.fotocanada.ca/Northern%20Ontario/Ontario%20North%202006%20Fall/index.html
They may not be the greatest photos BUT, the real question is: would they be any better if I was using a different camera?

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

Andrew Kalinowski

Photos: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
GPS hobby: http://www.GPSNuts.com
Topo maps: www.CanadianMaps.ca

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
michaejlt Registered since 29th Jan 2007Sun 21-Jan-07 09:25 PM
4 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#104. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 102



          

>Michael,
>
>To help you put the amp glow problem into perspective; have
>a look at few of my long exposure D80 shots that are within
>my gallery.
> They may not be the greatest photos BUT, the real question
>is: would they be any better if I was using a different
>camera?


Thanks Andrew for all the info and help...very nice pictures.

I'm keeping my D80.

Now to learn all the in's and out's of this camera...


Best Regards


Michael

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
JDL_1 Registered since 16th Nov 2006Mon 22-Jan-07 02:32 AM
31 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#105. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 96


Greenville, US
          

Some of these cameras are way over the top on the noise. It is probably hard to quantify at the user level, but I cannot get pictures that look anything like what "GPSMapNut" has on his website taken with a D80. Mine is noisy. You would have seen an enormous purplish or whitish blob at the top left center of the frame (not corrected for orientation). It is that simple. It needs to go back to Nikon, and I cannot tell you what a pain that is, and not knowing if Nikon will actually do anything about it.

I only wish I had noticed this during the 14 days I had to discover such problems as per the store's stated policy where I purchased the D80 kit from, and I would have exchanged it.

I have to agree that there is going to be some noise. It is in the fundamental nature of the electronics.

The "worse rap for it" might be due to the variation in the noise produced by the sensors. It can range from excellent, apparently, to downright horrid. The fact that the horrid ones escape into the public during production is appalling.

This problem isn't just limited to low serial numbers either. It probably just turns out that a majority of those in that range were defective. I have a higher serial# camera and it is unusable in many situations.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

oddstray Registered since 21st Jan 2007Sun 21-Jan-07 08:42 PM
6 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#103. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


US
          

Just a warning ... the camera bodies with this problem are still out there. I bought one on 1/13/2007 that turned out to have the problem, and to have a low serial number. When we explained the issue, the place where we bought it graciously exchanged it for one with a higher serial number which doesn't exhibit ithe problem. They're sending the older one back to Nikon.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Sharp30 Registered since 09th Jul 2006Tue 23-Jan-07 07:57 AM
34 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#108. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 103


Hudson Falls, US
          

My body number starts with 308...

used it for a shoot yesterday.

I was suprised to see the amp noise apparent using ISO500 at 1/100th
on any dark background

At ISO1600 it was also apparent at most speeds if I underexposed the pictures by even 1/2 stop.

So my camera is a bit worse than others and I called Nikon; they said to send it to the repair shop.

Its a shame because the image quality is quite good and it was a dream to use.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

jmans Registered since 26th Jan 2007Fri 26-Jan-07 11:46 AM
3 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#109. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


US
          

I have just confirmed the purple bloom problem. Set your camera to Hi 1 ISO at night in a dark room or even with some light. It is obvious. Now my D80 model has serial # higher then Toms Quote. It is probably going back. When I used the AC adaptor I got different results then AA's so it is internal and probably has to do with the components set too close to the sensor. I am very disappointed since I could have saved a lot and bought a Point and Shoot for these types of problems.

It is all connected to the ISO. At ISO 100 nothing for up to 1 Minute (cause that is all I tried). But at HI 1 it is obvious and unavoidable even at 1/4 or 1/13 or 1/2000. It becomes progressively worse. This is recall material. Question is why don't they just move the sensor power components. Looks like a cannon is in the stars for me. This was discussed with NIKON many years ago and they where able to fix it, who does their QA is the question?


I have the samples if you want them, just ask.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
jmans Registered since 26th Jan 2007Fri 26-Jan-07 12:08 PM
3 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#110. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 109


US
          

UPDATE to my post: My serial number is much higher 311 and it has the problem.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
JDL_1 Registered since 16th Nov 2006Fri 26-Jan-07 01:13 PM
31 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#111. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 110


Greenville, US
          

Having the noise visible in pictures at all speeds at 1600 iso would seem a good indicator of a problem to me. My camera would show the noise at iso 400 and lower in good pictures at 1/100 and faster shutter speeds.

Sensors are going to have some noise. Tests have been outlined here and pictures have been posted by folks here showing ISO and other information. Have you made comparisons?

I sent mine back and I am waiting for results.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
jmans Registered since 26th Jan 2007Fri 26-Jan-07 06:33 PM
3 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#112. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 111


US
          

Hello,

Unfortunately, I do not have the ability to post uploads on this blog. But at Hi 1 it is visiable at 1/2000 Second on all of my lenses at Max Apeture, and the pattern changes with power supply. Since it is going back, I probably will not have a chance to do extensive testing, but I have pics I could send you. Mine was good at 400 but I will check. Did you say you sent yours to Nikon or just returned it?

It is too bad, I love everything else about the camera. This is a real heartbreak for me. It was so simple to fix too.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
helibebcnof Silver Member Nikonian since 26th May 2006Fri 26-Jan-07 07:13 PM
25 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#113. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 112


Knoxville, US
          

I ran the test that Tom Hogan suggested in message #5 and after using the Auto Levels in CS2 I found substantial purple blotches.

I called Nikon's digital support line and was told that NikonUSA is aware of the problem and they are waiting to hear back from Nikon Japan as to what they plan to do to fix this problem. He did not ask me to send in my camera for repair.

He did say I could send in some images to Nikon at www.support.nikontech.com but the images had to be unaltered images that have not gone through any software.

Has anyone else had any feedback from Nikon regarding this problem and its possible fix?

Allan


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
JDL_1 Registered since 16th Nov 2006Fri 26-Jan-07 08:59 PM
31 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#114. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 112


Greenville, US
          

I was told by Nikon USA to send mine in. It would probably be nice if we were all speaking with the same reps there. I sure don't want to send it in for a shuffle and two step.

I've had the camera for a few months. I bought it before Thanksgiving so that I would have a quality camera for the holidays. For low ISO numbers and moderate shutter speeds the results were quite fine.

Now it is past the holidays and I wanted this reviewed by Nikon. I certainly want to be doing more with the camera than this.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

emanuelme Registered since 25th Dec 2006Sat 27-Jan-07 12:50 AM
6 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#115. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 0


US
          

I have run the test and found significant error at longer exposures. However, I did find purple haze lines running down the photo at all exposures once I changed the Auto Levels in PS. The pictures are uploaded here. I am an amateur so if someone could take a look at them and let me know if this is normal or abnormal, that would be greatly appreciated.

http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/8-AL.jpg
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/4-AL.jpg
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-4AL.jpg
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-8AL.jpg
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-15AL.jpg
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-30AL.jpg
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-60AL.jpg

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
mathjak107 Registered since 31st Dec 2006Sat 27-Jan-07 09:14 AM
474 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#116. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 115


bayside queens, US
          

thats exactly the results i got and im wondering the same thing. interesting enough though i cant seem to find a setting in capture nx that shows these purple streakes if i try it in capture instead of elements.

http://mm-photography.smugmug.com/browse

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Rebelranger Registered since 21st Nov 2006Sun 28-Jan-07 02:50 AM
81 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#117. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 116


Hercules, US
          


Is Nikon going to address this?

Rebelranger
Bay Area, CA

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Rebelranger Registered since 21st Nov 2006Mon 05-Feb-07 12:30 AM
81 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to send message via AOL IM
#118. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 117


Hercules, US
          

I just upgraded the firmware to version 1.1 and this amp noise-purple streaking is now gone. Actually, even the metering seems better...
Have any of you performed the upgrade and tested to see if it also fixed this problem?

Rebelranger
Bay Area, CA

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
emanuelme Registered since 25th Dec 2006Mon 05-Feb-07 12:54 AM
6 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#119. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 118


US
          

Thanks for your response. I have not yet upgraded the firmware. (I've been busy with classes.) I will probably get a chance to do so on Tuesday. I will post my results.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
mathjak107 Registered since 31st Dec 2006Mon 05-Feb-07 08:34 AM
474 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#120. "RE: Possible D80 problem: Thom Hogan"
In response to Reply # 115


bayside queens, US
          

>I have run the test and found significant error at longer
>exposures. However, I did find purple haze lines running
>down the photo at all exposures once I changed the Auto
>Levels in PS. The pictures are uploaded here. I am an
>amateur so if someone could take a look at them and let me
>know if this is normal or abnormal, that would be greatly
>appreciated.
>
>http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/8-AL.jpg
>http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/4-AL.jpg
>http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-4AL.jpg
>http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-8AL.jpg
>http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-15AL.jpg
>http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-30AL.jpg
>http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k276/emanuelme/Nikon%20D80/1-60AL.jpg



did it turn out the purplish streaks running thru out are part of the problem too or are those normal noise?

http://mm-photography.smugmug.com/browse

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D90/D80/D70 (Public) topic #5254 Previous topic | Next topic


Take the Nikonians Tour and learn more about being a Nikonian Wiki /FAQ /Help Listen to our MP3 photography radio channels Find anything on Nikon and imaging technology - fast!

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2014
All Rights Reserved

Nikonians®, NikoScope® and NikoniansAcademy™ are trademarks owned by Nikonians.org.
Nikon®, Nikonos® and Nikkor® are registered trademarks of Nikon Corporation.