#1. "RE: 70-200 or 80-200" | In response to Reply # 0
vettelover Registered since 23rd Jun 2004Sun 26-Dec-04 03:01 PM
Depends on what you shoot. If you want the lens for it's speed, the VR will give you a couple of extra stops handheld. The VR lens also focuses very quickly and has great bokeh. If you always use a tripod, you may as well save your $$.
#2. "RE: 70-200 or 80-200" | In response to Reply # 1
buzzjoy Registered since 31st Jul 2004Sun 26-Dec-04 03:37 PM
I faced the same decision and went with the VR, and I love it. I took a handheld shot of our cat yesterday morning inside the house at full zoom. It is not just sharp, but the whiskers and eye details stay sharp well beyond 100% viewing, still really good at 400%! This is a new experience for me, since most shots begin to lose definition before I reach 100% and all quickly deteriorate beyond 100%.
The other factor that helped me decide was the issue of will you be satisfied for life without the VR? I decided that if I did go with the 80-200 that I would probably be second guessing myslef for years to come, and would probably end up buying both and selling one later. So I saved the hassle and bought my dream lens right away. If money is no issue, then I can't recommend it more highly.
My only caveat is: this is a BIG HEAVY lens. Right now I am captivated by its new capabilities and will take it everywhere, but it would be a tough companion on a long road trip. It also does not fit in my current bag, so there is another expense coming up. Ah, NAS ...
Have fun, buzz
Trying to learn to click less and see more.
Trying to learn to (click less and) see more
#3. "RE: 70-200 or 80-200" | In response to Reply # 1
#4. "RE: 70-200 or 80-200" | In response to Reply # 3
pookiejones Registered since 24th Nov 2004Sun 26-Dec-04 07:56 PM
I use to use the 80-200 2.8 until it was stolen. I replaced it with the 70-200 VR about a week ago. I think the 70-200 VR focuses much quicker. Physically it is a little longer, which made me rework the dividers in my bag. They are both heavy so I don't know if there is a big difference between them. So far I am thrilled with the 70-200 and think it is well worth the extra money.