nikonians

Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

| |

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries News Workshops Shop Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?

jimmills

Fort Walton Beach, FL, US
126 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?"

jimmills Silver Member Nikonian since 01st Dec 2010
Sat 12-May-12 01:49 PM

Don't have a 3100 or a 3200 but can answer the question about how long before you want to upgrade. Three days is a good figure. Bought a D5000 and within a couple of weeks the D7000 came out. Fought the NAS for about 3 months but caved in and bought the D7000. Along comes the D5100 and I thought it would make a much better back-up than the D5000. Fought the NAS for a couple of months but again caved in and bought the D5100. Still have all three cameras. Now the D800 is calling my name pitifully. However, at this point, if I bought it, the wife would reach into my chest and rip out my by-passes. What a shame.

Jim

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? [View all] , Zeya , Thu 10-May-12 10:29 PM
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? jpFoto
11th May 2012
1
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? WD4MLA Silver Member
11th May 2012
2
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? coolmom42 Silver Member Awarded for her enthusiastic support of the community and exemplifying the Nikonian mission “Share, Learn and Inspire”
11th May 2012
3
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? dcs85
11th May 2012
4
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? jimmills Silver Member
12th May 2012
5
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? Zeya
14th May 2012
6
          Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? jpFoto
14th May 2012
7
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? bclaff Silver Member Awarded for multiple contributions for the Resources
17th May 2012
8
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? meat
17th May 2012
9
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? Zeya
21st May 2012
10
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? lakey
21st May 2012
11