nikonians

Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

| |

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries News Workshops Shop Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Print Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby MASTER YOUR NIKON CAMERA Nikon D5000/D3000 series (Public) topic #5893
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?" Previous topic | Next topic
dcs85   US  Registered since 08th Feb 2012 Fri 11-May-12 07:15 PM
20 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#4. "RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?"
In response to In response to 0



I have had my D3100 for almost a year and a ½ and am very pleased with it. I can’t comment about the higher ISO performance compared to the D3200.

In general I am satisfied with my photos at 800 or 1600. Very rarely have I ventured above 1600. I think a lot of this is subjective and more about managing expectations rather that being critical of performance.

The only two features I don’t have and wish I did are a depth of field preview and bracketing. But in an entry level package I am not complaining and have no plans to upgrade for the foreseeable future. I am pleased with my photos and have a whole lot of learning to do before the D3100 is not enough camera for me.

  

Alert Print | Reply | Quote

A general, generic topicFirst SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? [View all] , Zeya , Thu 10-May-12 10:29 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? jpFoto
11th May 2012
1
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? WD4MLA Silver Member
11th May 2012
2
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? coolmom42 Silver Member Awarded for her enthusiastic support of the community and exemplifying the Nikonian mission “Share, Learn and Inspire”
11th May 2012
3
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? dcs85
11th May 2012
4
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? jimmills Silver Member
12th May 2012
5
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? Zeya
14th May 2012
6
          Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? jpFoto
14th May 2012
7
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? bclaff Silver Member Awarded for multiple contributions for the Resources
17th May 2012
8
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? meat
17th May 2012
9
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? Zeya
21st May 2012
10
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? lakey
21st May 2012
11

Forums Lobby MASTER YOUR NIKON CAMERA Nikon D5000/D3000 series (Public) topic #5893 Previous topic | Next topic