Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D700 topic #754
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?" Previous topic | Next topic
gpoole Platinum Member Nikonian since 14th Feb 2004Fri 18-Jul-08 11:06 PM
3153 posts Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#12. "RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?"
In response to In response to 6
Fri 18-Jul-08 11:07 PM by gpoole

Farmington Hills, US
          

Frankly IMHO the worst decision Nikon have made with the D700 is to incorporate the on-camera flash. Not because the flash is a bad idea, quite the opposite there are a number of advantages. But the reason it's a bad idea is because they've had to trade off the 100% viewfinder and settle for a 95% viewfinder. Now even that isn't really bad at all but it's being picked over like a three week old corpse on this forum as a HUGE problem.

To me the ability to have a built in CLS commander with the built in flash instead of having to buy another SB-800 or an SU-800 outweighs the viewfinder area loss.

For those instances that 100% view is critical Live View works great. If I'm framing so carefully that the 95% is a problem my camera would be tripod mounted and I would be working slowly enough that Live View would not be a handicap.

Gary in SE Michigan, USA. Co-organizer of the Southern Michigan Chapter
Nikonians membership - My most important photographic investment, after the camera.
D4, D800e, D300, D90, F6, FM3a (black), FM2n (chrome)
YashicaMat 124, Graflex Speed Graphic 4x5
My Nikonians Gallery & Our Chapter Gallery

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

A general, generic topicWhy "just" 95% would be a bad thing? [View all] , cayzi , Wed 09-Jul-08 07:01 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
walkerr Administrator
09th Jul 2008
1
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
yelcab Silver Member
09th Jul 2008
2
Reply message RE: 95% similar thread
monteverde_org Silver Member
09th Jul 2008
3
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
Len Shepherd Gold Member
10th Jul 2008
4
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
cayzi
16th Jul 2008
5
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
Noel Holland Platinum Member
17th Jul 2008
6
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
nl
18th Jul 2008
7
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
cayzi
18th Jul 2008
8
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
RWCooper Silver Member
18th Jul 2008
9
Reply message RE: Bjørn 90% viewfinder coverage
monteverde_org Silver Member
18th Jul 2008
10
     Reply message RE: 95% vs. 90% math
monteverde_org Silver Member
18th Jul 2008
11
          Reply message RE: 95% vs. 90% math
RWCooper Silver Member
19th Jul 2008
15
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
westside_guy
18th Jul 2008
14
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
gpoole Platinum Member
18th Jul 2008
12
     Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
brad_nikon
18th Jul 2008
13
          Reply message D700 95% - sensor cleaning module, not the flash
monteverde_org Silver Member
19th Jul 2008
16

Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D700 topic #754 Previous topic | Next topic


Take the Nikonians Tour and learn more about being a Nikonian Wiki /FAQ /Help Listen to our MP3 photography radio channels Find anything on Nikon and imaging technology - fast!

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2013
All Rights Reserved

Nikonians®, NikoScope® and NikoniansAcademy™ are trademarks owned by Nikonians.org.
Nikon®, Nikonos® and Nikkor® are registered trademarks of Nikon Corporation.