Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D700 topic #754
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 95% vs. 90% math" Previous topic | Next topic
monteverde_org Silver Member Nikonian since 16th Nov 2007Fri 18-Jul-08 10:53 PM
1283 posts Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#11. "RE: 95% vs. 90% math"
In response to In response to 10


Monteverde Cloud Forest, CR
          

There is an interesting post by zoetmb here about the math 90% surface vs. 95% vewfinder coverage:

"If there is 95% coverage in each direction, he would be correct from the perspective of area.
Here’s how to calculate it:
The Nikon FX frame is 36mm x 23.9mm resulting in a total area of 860.4 sq mm
95% of 36mm is 34.2mm.
95% of 23.9mm is 22.705mm. 34.2mm x 22.705mm = 776.511 sq mm

776.511 sq mm / 860.4 sq mm = 90.25%."

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

A general, generic topicWhy "just" 95% would be a bad thing? [View all] , cayzi , Wed 09-Jul-08 07:01 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
walkerr Administrator
09th Jul 2008
1
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
yelcab Silver Member
09th Jul 2008
2
Reply message RE: 95% similar thread
monteverde_org Silver Member
09th Jul 2008
3
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
Len Shepherd Gold Member
10th Jul 2008
4
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
cayzi
16th Jul 2008
5
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
Noel Holland Platinum Member
17th Jul 2008
6
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
nl
18th Jul 2008
7
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
cayzi
18th Jul 2008
8
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
RWCooper Silver Member
18th Jul 2008
9
Reply message RE: Bjørn 90% viewfinder coverage
monteverde_org Silver Member
18th Jul 2008
10
     Reply message RE: 95% vs. 90% math
monteverde_org Silver Member
18th Jul 2008
11
          Reply message RE: 95% vs. 90% math
RWCooper Silver Member
19th Jul 2008
15
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
westside_guy
18th Jul 2008
14
Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
gpoole Platinum Member
18th Jul 2008
12
     Reply message RE: Why "just" 95% would be a bad thing?
brad_nikon
18th Jul 2008
13
          Reply message D700 95% - sensor cleaning module, not the flash
monteverde_org Silver Member
19th Jul 2008
16

Forums Lobby GET TO KNOW YOUR CAMERA & MASTER IT Nikon D700 topic #754 Previous topic | Next topic


Take the Nikonians Tour and learn more about being a Nikonian Wiki /FAQ /Help Listen to our MP3 photography radio channels Find anything on Nikon and imaging technology - fast!

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2013
All Rights Reserved

Nikonians®, NikoScope® and NikoniansAcademy™ are trademarks owned by Nikonians.org.
Nikon®, Nikonos® and Nikkor® are registered trademarks of Nikon Corporation.