Mel,

I wasn't targeting you or what you wrote. I simply pressed reply after the last post I read. In fact, I really wasn't interested in your post at all. I found the quote from the one before yours much more interesting.

I was addressing a number of the posts I had read and felt that the emotional resistance to shooting a large number of frames was worth exploring.

And you certainly can pick any analogy you like but that doesn't mean you understand my post or the direction I was taking it. This isn't a forum based upon ideological dogma. Your entitled to your point of view as am I or anybody else.

And finally, if you don't think this thread has anything remotely to do with transitioning from traditional technique to new techniques made available by new technology, then maybe we should simply agree to disagree and just move on.

Thanks for posting and presenting your point of view.....Mark


Mark Sloane
Danville, CA