Go to a  "printer friendly" view of this message which allow an easy print Printer-friendly copy Go to the page which allows you to send this topic link and a message to a friend Email this topic to a friend
Forums Lobby MULTILINGUAL NIKONIANS English Café (Public) topic #475
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"" Previous topic | Next topic
geo Basic MemberThu 21-Sep-00 04:42 PM
224 posts Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin    Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profile
#29. "RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?""
In response to In response to 28


Roma, IT
          

LAST EDITED ON Sep-21-00 AT 07:07 PM (GMT)

Maybe someone is still reading, maybe not. Who cares. For honesty's sake, and for those still there, I reply.
Adesso: I do agree with you, I know that pros are usually very proficient at their job. Their requirements are simply different from those of an advanced amateur concerned with quality, or at least from mine. And it has been proven (though I am not going to do the effort of writing the web address again) that a lens used in AF (and I am not saying "an AF lens") can not be as sharp as the same lens focused manually with an appropriate screen. If you think that your images are O.K., well, I believe you, but someone dared to take measurements and comparisons and talks in a different way. I am not going, of course, to teach anything to anybody; I just say that do exist opinions different from "if AF is O.K. for me, it must be O.K. for everybody else". And are very credible opinions.
Al: maybe I am one that changes topic willing to have the last word, but at least I am not one that stops a topic when it's not yet over. As for bashing Nikon, what I am saying, again, is that the number one camera maker in the world just does not care any more of a, maybe tiny, market share to which I belong: that of people wanting no-nonsense cameras. I shoot landscapes with a tripod and prime lenses: I do not need AF (I can not be in a hurry if I use a tripod), nor autoexposure, nor MD. They mean useless weight and cost to me, so I do not want them. If you are happy shooting landscapes with a camera built for speed, with superfast auto everything, as I told you already once, good for you. And I am happy too.
Again, just to be sure: I am not bashing Nikon; I am saying that AF can not be as precise as MF, that I do not need it, that the F100's body is made in polycarb, that plastic bodies is a change that people don't seem to like even thogh you don't see the plastic from outside and plastic may even be better than metal.
As for liking changes or not, well, I would like to see same change interesting to me, for a change; I am sure I will like it.
Frankie: of course, who needs AF buys AF. I just do not, this is all. As for medium or large format, I usually go around with a Photo Trekker filled to the top with two bodies and seven primes ranging from 20 to 500 mm.; and I use and need THEM ALL. If I had to replicate the same array of field angles with medium or large format, then I would be going around with a small truck, so I compromise (after all I prefer to have a lens adequate for the right composition rather than miss it in favour of better sharpness) and go on with 35 mm.. But then I need to squeeze the most in terms of quality out of that small film. So it's PKR (sorry, I do also have this problem, don't like AF and don't like Velvia too), fixed focal lenghts, well chosen lens models used at their best apertures, and MF.
And, just to stop it: I waste time writing, you waste time reading too. I do my shooting while I am in Maremma, and my writing while I am in Rome (I don't shoot here because I don't like cities), so I am not loosing any picture, don't worry.
BJNicholls: same as above.

Geo

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

This is a hot, active topic!changing times... good or bad? [View all] , f8bthere , Fri 15-Sep-00 02:23 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
frankie
15th Sep 2000
1
Reply message this site is very civil
f8bthere
15th Sep 2000
2
Reply message ...good or bad? Both.
BJNicholls Gold Member
15th Sep 2000
3
Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
AlanC
15th Sep 2000
4
Reply message piano analogy
f8bthere
15th Sep 2000
6
Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
frankie
16th Sep 2000
12
     Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
AlanC
16th Sep 2000
13
Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
bgs Administrator
15th Sep 2000
5
Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
f5fstop
15th Sep 2000
7
Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
f8bthere
15th Sep 2000
8
     Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
BJNicholls Gold Member
15th Sep 2000
9
     Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
f5fstop
15th Sep 2000
10
Reply message RE: changing times... good or bad?
photobri
16th Sep 2000
11
Reply message Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
geo
18th Sep 2000
14
Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
f5fstop
18th Sep 2000
15
Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
frankie
18th Sep 2000
16
     Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
geo
19th Sep 2000
17
          Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
frankie
19th Sep 2000
18
               Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
geo
19th Sep 2000
19
               Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
frankie
19th Sep 2000
20
               Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
avm247 Moderator
19th Sep 2000
21
                    Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
BJNicholls Gold Member
20th Sep 2000
22
                         Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
frankie
20th Sep 2000
23
                              Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
geo
21st Sep 2000
24
                                   Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
Adesso
21st Sep 2000
25
                                   Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
f5fstop
21st Sep 2000
26
                                   Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
frankie
21st Sep 2000
27
                                        Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
BJNicholls Gold Member
21st Sep 2000
28
                                             Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
geo
21st Sep 2000
29
                                                  Reply message RE: Re: "Changing times... good or bad?"
frankie
21st Sep 2000
30
                                                  Reply message a tip of the hat
f8bthere
21st Sep 2000
31
                                                  Reply message RE: a tip of the hat
frankie
22nd Sep 2000
32
                                                  Reply message RE: On Change
jrp Administrator
23rd Sep 2000
33
                                                  Reply message RE: On Change
BJNicholls Gold Member
23rd Sep 2000
34
                                                  Reply message RE: On Change
bgs Administrator
24th Sep 2000
35
                                                  Reply message RE: On Change
jrp Administrator
25th Sep 2000
36

Forums Lobby MULTILINGUAL NIKONIANS English Café (Public) topic #475 Previous topic | Next topic


Take the Nikonians Tour and learn more about being a Nikonian Wiki /FAQ /Help Listen to our MP3 photography radio channels Find anything on Nikon and imaging technology - fast!

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2014
All Rights Reserved

Nikonians®, NikoScope® and NikoniansAcademy™ are trademarks owned by Nikonians.org.
Nikon®, Nikonos® and Nikkor® are registered trademarks of Nikon Corporation.