nikonians

Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.


Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries News Workshops Shop Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
philipbaker

Stockport, UK
53 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE:Critique"

philipbaker Registered since 17th Sep 2010
Mon 06-Dec-10 07:06 AM

Hello Brian

Thank you for your time and observations.

It would please me to be your disciple!

The distance I have travelled from my very first image posting to the very latest has all been due to your guidance so freely and expertly given.

My early shots in the local park had a greater percentage of shadow in the background so that I could get the runners emerging into the light from overhanging trees against a dark backdrop, this was my attempt at lifting my photography a notch higher. Having noted your comments on the latest images I think I shall have to settle for a less dramatic action shot with the runners further forward in the open, this will probably be in the spring.

I shall go and study your gallery to see how a real pro composes pictures.

Many thanks and the kindest regards.

Philip

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

This is a hot, active topic! D50 Sharpness [View all] , philipbaker , Thu 30-Sep-10 09:48 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
1
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
2
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
3
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
8
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
9
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
11
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
4
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
10
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
12
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
7
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
13
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
14
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
15
     Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
16
     Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
17
          Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
18
               Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
19
                    Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
20
                         Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
21
                              Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
22
                                   Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
23
                                   Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
24
                                        Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
25
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
26
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
27
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
28
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
29
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
30
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
31
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
32
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
33
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
34
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
35
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
36
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
37
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
38
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
39
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
40
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
41
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
48
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
42
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
43
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
44
                                             Reply message RE: Critique
45
                                                  Reply message RE: Critique
46
                                                  Reply message RE: Critique
47