
Philadelphia, US
|
Actually, by telling us what camera you have, you have given us far more information than is in your profile, and it's really helpful, as now I can give you a relevant answer, although, to an extent, it's not one you'll like.
You have an inexpensive Point and Shoot digital camera. The XThinn 8350, from Silicon Valley Peripherals is an 8 Mega Pixels CCD, Size : 1/2.5 inch digital point and shoot camera with a lens having a focal length range of: f = 6.2 ( W ) ~ 18.6 ( T ) mm, with a 3X optical zoom, 4X digital zoom. I immediately through away the 4X digital zoom as the quality of the photo when using that zoom will be terrible. Point and shoots have a very small sensor which limits their ability to be able to show distant objects well. The maximum focal length equivalent of your camera to a DSLR is 105mm which barely scratches the telephoto lens (The lens we use to pull in and magnify distant object.) range. For example, in a recent wildlife workshop I ran for 20 students I recommended a minimum of a 300mm focal length for wildlife photography for birds, if you're trying to get small birds. Larger birds, if you can get close can be captured with a somewhat short lens at times. For insects, one can utilize much shorter lenses if you can get close enough for macro photography shots of them.
You said in the original post, "I am new to this so I was wondering how you get such good photographs of fling objects, like flies, birds, lizards, etc?
The short answer is, if it's flying, with your camera, you're not going to get it, except for the occasional lucky shot.
You camera just isn't capable of capturing the photos you've seen like the one I'm using as an example below.
Let's examine the photo for a moment. It was taken with a D700, which is a full size pro level DSLR. You don't need a camera as good as that, but you surely need a DSLR of reasonably good quality to capture this type of image. Attached to the camera I had a 500mm Nikkor lens plus a 1.4x Nikon teleconverter to get a total lens focal length of 700mm, far in excess of your camera's capability. Moreover, there is no shutter lag with my camera, the length of time between pressing the shutter release, and when the camera actually takes the photo. I also have a significant advantage from my camera's autofocus system in keeping the shot in focus as I follow the flight of the bird. Your camera can't accomplish that. Finally, and I'm only hitting the major points, the dynamic range capability of my camera far exceeds yours. Dynamic range has to do with the range of from dark to light a camera's sensor can capture. Your camera would have probably blown out the white parts of the bird and eliminated any detail in them.
Now if you're talking about flies, birds, lizards, in trees or on the ground, you may be able to get some very nice photos of them, if you can get close enough to them to fill much of your frame (the monitor on the back of your camera) prior to taking the photo.
As it turns out, it takes good equipment for sure, but it also takes more photographic knowledge than the average beginner has, so one thing you can do immediately, if you want to make these kinds of photos in the future is start learning about exposure now. I strongly recommend the book Understanding Exposure, How to Shoot Great Photographs with Any Camera by Bryan Peterson for anyone new to photography. It's a great book (~$16) to begin building a foundation of photographic knowledge.
"
Ned A Nikonians Team Member
----------------------------- Visit my Travel Photography Blog and my Galleries.
Attachment
#1, (jpg file)
|