nikonians

Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.


Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries News Workshops Shop Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
Jimmychia

cincinnati, US
3 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author
Jimmychia Registered since 11th Jul 2012
Wed 07-Nov-12 04:43 PM

I've been using view nx2 for a while now. Im looking for a new software which is faster, has photo stacking,has watermarking ability and as easy to use as view nx2. Any advice? Thank you.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

ericbowles

Atlanta, US
9361 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

#1. "RE: Moving on from view nx2" | In response to Reply # 0

ericbowles Moderator Awarded for his in-depth knowledge and high level skills in various areas, especially Landscape and Wildlife Photoghraphy Writer Ribbon awarded for for his article contributions to the community Nikonian since 25th Nov 2005
Sat 10-Nov-12 02:22 PM

There are essentially two paths - an Adobe centric path or a Nikon centric path.

If you want to stay with the Nikon centric path, Photo Mechanic and Capture NX2 would be the likely choices. Capture NX2 is the advanced editor. I use it for 3-5% of my total images - just my selects. It handled 99% of my edits and maintains those edits in a single file - the NEF. Like View, it honors your camera settings. It is a very good editor with the key features being selective editing and control points. Any editing step can be quickly and easily applied to any portion of the image you desire. I use Photo Mechanic for ingesting, conversion to JPEG, and watermarking.

If you head down the Adobe centric path, the starting point is Lightroom. Lightroom started as a catalog but has become a good full function editor. It maintains the edits in the original NEF, provides some selective editing, and works well with most plugins that work with Photoshop. It has increasingly become the choice over Photoshop. Like Capture, it would handle 98-99% of your editing needs.

There are pros on cons on each. Nikon programs honor camera settings while Adobe has its own very close interpretation. Adobe is much more open to plugins. Lightroom and Photoshop require periodic upgrades - much more often than Nikon, so they end up costing a little more. And the Nikon/Nik relationship has changed and we don't know what kind of updates will follow.

Either way, the programs are solid and will handle most of your needs. There are always other programs used for specialty applications - HDR, stacking, some cloning, etc. I imagine 85+% of photographers use Lightroom - almost all the Canon shooters, most of the Photoshop users (due to evolution and learning curve), and a majority of the remaining Nikon users. And there are plenty of other products, but It's pretty safe to narrow your choice to these two paths unless you have a really compelling reason.


Eric Bowles
Nikonians Team
My Gallery
Workshops

Nikonians membership — my most important photographic investment, after the camera

G