| Subject |
Author |
Message Date |
ID |
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
esantos  |
01st Jul 2008 | 1
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
rickpaul |
01st Jul 2008 | 5
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
rbeal |
01st Jul 2008 | 7
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
jbloom  |
01st Jul 2008 | 10
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
tecdiver1 |
02nd Jul 2008 | 24
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
MYSTIFY |
08th Jul 2008 | 72
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
DCLipp |
14th Jul 2008 | 94
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
paullgj |
20th Jul 2008 | 122
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
rbeal |
20th Jul 2008 | 125
|
 RE: wide is wide |
monteverde_org  |
20th Jul 2008 | 126
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Arkayem  |
20th Jul 2008 | 131
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Arkayem  |
20th Jul 2008 | 132
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
brad_nikon |
21st Jul 2008 | 136
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
DMaciak |
05th Aug 2008 | 182
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
robb  |
08th Aug 2008 | 197
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
jku |
01st Jul 2008 | 2
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Valentino  |
01st Jul 2008 | 4
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 44
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Valentino  |
01st Jul 2008 | 3
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
sfb_dot_com |
01st Jul 2008 | 8
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
jbloom  |
01st Jul 2008 | 11
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
jeffmeyers  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 26
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
oldcam |
02nd Jul 2008 | 27
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Valentino  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 29
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
kenburg |
14th Jul 2008 | 99
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
MarkNYC |
02nd Jul 2008 | 31
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
The Long Ranger  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 46
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Efem |
01st Jul 2008 | 6
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
skorj |
01st Jul 2008 | 9
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
DrJay32  |
01st Jul 2008 | 12
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
gwelland  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 42
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Voodoo |
01st Jul 2008 | 13
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
oldcam |
01st Jul 2008 | 15
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Valentino  |
01st Jul 2008 | 16
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
SRFast  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 17
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
tdtaylor |
02nd Jul 2008 | 19
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
srm_d300 |
02nd Jul 2008 | 18
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
xtrememac  |
07th Jul 2008 | 61
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
briantilley  |
07th Jul 2008 | 62
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
stevew |
07th Aug 2008 | 190
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
spark29uk |
02nd Jul 2008 | 36
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Valentino  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 39
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
skorj |
02nd Jul 2008 | 20
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
LyleRussell |
02nd Jul 2008 | 21
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
skorj |
02nd Jul 2008 | 22
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
oldcam |
02nd Jul 2008 | 23
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
highlander |
09th Jul 2008 | 81
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Aviatorbumm |
02nd Jul 2008 | 25
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
MarcoP |
02nd Jul 2008 | 28
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
PJinNJ |
02nd Jul 2008 | 30
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
MstrBones  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 32
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Fovea  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 33
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Edgy01 |
14th Jul 2008 | 93
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
gkaiseril  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 34
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
df222 |
02nd Jul 2008 | 35
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
dgberg  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 37
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Martin Turner  |
02nd Jul 2008 | 38
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Max Power |
02nd Jul 2008 | 40
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
skorj |
03rd Jul 2008 | 41
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
gwelland  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 43
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 45
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AgapeLight  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 47
|
   RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 48
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AgapeLight  |
03rd Jul 2008 | 49
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
KnightPhoto  |
04th Jul 2008 | 55
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
jbloom  |
04th Jul 2008 | 56
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
oldcam |
03rd Jul 2008 | 50
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Max Power |
03rd Jul 2008 | 51
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
MarkNYC |
03rd Jul 2008 | 52
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
skorj |
04th Jul 2008 | 54
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Nikon Bob |
03rd Jul 2008 | 53
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
doogienj |
05th Jul 2008 | 57
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AgapeLight  |
05th Jul 2008 | 58
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Waterboy  |
06th Jul 2008 | 59
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
DKESLERFL |
07th Jul 2008 | 64
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
mwhals  |
06th Jul 2008 | 60
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Arkayem  |
07th Jul 2008 | 63
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
JPHoush |
07th Jul 2008 | 65
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
artizen65 |
08th Jul 2008 | 66
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
dphotobayer |
08th Jul 2008 | 67
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
oldcam |
08th Jul 2008 | 68
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
08th Jul 2008 | 69
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Valentino  |
08th Jul 2008 | 70
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
08th Jul 2008 | 71
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Martin Turner  |
08th Jul 2008 | 73
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
xtrememac  |
08th Jul 2008 | 74
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
oldcam |
08th Jul 2008 | 75
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
briantilley  |
08th Jul 2008 | 76
|
   RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
DKESLERFL |
08th Jul 2008 | 78
|
    RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
briantilley  |
08th Jul 2008 | 79
|
   RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
xtrememac  |
09th Jul 2008 | 80
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
KnightPhoto  |
09th Jul 2008 | 82
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
09th Jul 2008 | 83
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
briantilley  |
09th Jul 2008 | 84
|
  RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
monteverde_org  |
09th Jul 2008 | 85
|
  RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
Arkayem  |
10th Jul 2008 |
|
   RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
monteverde_org  |
10th Jul 2008 | 87
|
  RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
Arkayem  |
10th Jul 2008 |
|
  RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
Arkayem  |
10th Jul 2008 | 86
|
  RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
Waterboy  |
10th Jul 2008 | 88
|
  RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
artizen65 |
11th Jul 2008 | 89
|
  RE: pixel density or pixel size? |
artizen65 |
11th Jul 2008 | 90
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Martin Turner  |
08th Jul 2008 | 77
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Mike in Kansas |
14th Jul 2008 | 101
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Noel Holland  |
11th Jul 2008 | 91
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AAshley |
14th Jul 2008 | 97
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
ZoneV  |
12th Jul 2008 | 92
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
shipibo |
14th Jul 2008 | 95
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AAshley |
14th Jul 2008 | 96
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
artizen65 |
14th Jul 2008 | 98
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Fireshot51  |
14th Jul 2008 | 100
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Snapperlondon |
14th Jul 2008 | 102
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
hades |
14th Jul 2008 | 103
|
 RE: FX helps you save money? |
monteverde_org  |
14th Jul 2008 | 104
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Arkayem  |
14th Jul 2008 | 105
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
canoeman  |
15th Jul 2008 | 106
|
   RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Arkayem  |
15th Jul 2008 | 107
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
canoeman  |
16th Jul 2008 | 115
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
nikolaj1972 |
15th Jul 2008 | 112
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Arkayem  |
15th Jul 2008 | 114
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
dm1dave  |
15th Jul 2008 | 110
|
RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
Michael1597 |
15th Jul 2008 | 108
|
 RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
Snapperlondon |
15th Jul 2008 | 109
|
 RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
SezWho |
15th Jul 2008 | 111
|
 RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
mwhals  |
15th Jul 2008 | 113
|
 RE: FX vs. DX weight & economics |
monteverde_org  |
16th Jul 2008 | 117
|
 RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
Arkayem  |
16th Jul 2008 | 119
|
 RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
davewolfs |
20th Jul 2008 | 124
|
  RE: 20lbs of equipment? |
monteverde_org  |
20th Jul 2008 | 127
|
 RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
dphotobayer |
02nd Aug 2008 | 171
|
 RE: Nothing to do with ADs |
agitater  |
03rd Aug 2008 | 172
|
 RE: Nothing to do with climbing photos |
monteverde_org  |
03rd Aug 2008 | 173
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
eyeoftheape |
16th Jul 2008 | 116
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
dclarhorn  |
16th Jul 2008 | 118
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Arkayem  |
16th Jul 2008 | 120
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
xtrememac  |
16th Jul 2008 | 121
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Joves |
20th Jul 2008 | 123
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
mwhals  |
20th Jul 2008 | 128
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
skorj |
20th Jul 2008 | 129
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
LMMiller9  |
20th Jul 2008 | 130
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Mike in Kansas |
21st Jul 2008 | 135
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
JPHoush |
20th Jul 2008 | 133
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AgapeLight  |
20th Jul 2008 | 134
|
 RE: D3x D300 killer |
monteverde_org  |
21st Jul 2008 | 137
|
 RE: D3x D300 killer |
AgapeLight  |
21st Jul 2008 | 138
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
brad_nikon |
21st Jul 2008 | 139
|
I would love to have FX, someday... |
woodworker5112 |
21st Jul 2008 | 140
|
 RE: I would love to have FX, someday... |
Snapperlondon |
21st Jul 2008 | 141
|
 RE: I would love to have FX, someday... |
AgapeLight  |
21st Jul 2008 | 142
|
 A different perspective |
JHZR2 |
29th Jul 2008 | 143
|
 RE: I would love to have FX, someday... |
agitater  |
30th Jul 2008 | 145
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
agitater  |
30th Jul 2008 | 144
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
brad_nikon |
30th Jul 2008 | 146
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Waterboy  |
30th Jul 2008 | 147
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AgapeLight  |
30th Jul 2008 | 148
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Dave Tea |
31st Jul 2008 | 149
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
nimaafshar |
31st Jul 2008 | 150
|
  RE: D700, 18-200, focus & metering |
monteverde_org  |
31st Jul 2008 | 154
|
 RE: D700, 18-200, focus & metering |
agitater  |
01st Aug 2008 | 158
|
 RE: D700 vs. D300 focus & metering |
monteverde_org  |
01st Aug 2008 | 160
|
 RE: D700 vs. D300 focus & metering |
JHZR2 |
01st Aug 2008 | 161
|
 RE: D700 vs. D300 focus & metering |
Tony_Jeffree  |
01st Aug 2008 | 162
|
 RE: D700 vs. D300 focus & metering |
Valentino  |
01st Aug 2008 | 163
|
 RE: D700 vs. D300 focus & metering |
Tony_Jeffree  |
01st Aug 2008 | 164
|
 RE: D700 vs. D300 focus & metering |
Valentino  |
01st Aug 2008 | 166
|
 RE: DX cropping the #### example |
monteverde_org  |
01st Aug 2008 | 167
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
31st Jul 2008 | 151
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
AgapeLight  |
31st Jul 2008 | 152
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
agitater  |
31st Jul 2008 | 153
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Dave Tea |
31st Jul 2008 | 155
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
agitater  |
01st Aug 2008 | 159
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
dphotobayer |
31st Jul 2008 | 156
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
brad_nikon |
31st Jul 2008 | 157
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
slowry88  |
01st Aug 2008 | 165
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
brad_nikon |
01st Aug 2008 | 168
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
briantilley  |
01st Aug 2008 | 169
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Waterboy  |
01st Aug 2008 | 170
|
RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
Len Shepherd  |
03rd Aug 2008 | 174
|
 RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
wchutt |
05th Aug 2008 | 175
|
 RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
agitater  |
05th Aug 2008 | 176
|
  RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
Tony_Jeffree  |
05th Aug 2008 | 178
|
 RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
agitater  |
05th Aug 2008 | 179
|
 RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
woodworker5112 |
05th Aug 2008 | 180
|
 RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
Tony_Jeffree  |
05th Aug 2008 | 181
|
 RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
woodworker5112 |
06th Aug 2008 | 184
|
 RE: DX is best for some things, FX for others |
brad_nikon |
05th Aug 2008 | 177
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
brad_nikon |
05th Aug 2008 | 183
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Lex |
06th Aug 2008 | 185
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
RoFus  |
06th Aug 2008 | 186
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
oldcam |
06th Aug 2008 | 187
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good - old news? |
monteverde_org  |
06th Aug 2008 | 188
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tassie Devil |
07th Aug 2008 | 189
|
RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
narc |
07th Aug 2008 | 191
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
SezWho |
07th Aug 2008 | 192
|
  RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
narc |
08th Aug 2008 | 195
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
Tony_Jeffree  |
08th Aug 2008 | 196
|
 RE: Bigger is always better |
monteverde_org  |
08th Aug 2008 | 193
|
  RE: Bigger is always better |
agitater  |
08th Aug 2008 | 194
|
 RE: Why FX when the DX is so good |
joskefotoske |
08th Aug 2008 | 198
|